Examination of uncertainty in per unit area estimates of above ground biomass using terrestrial LiDAR and ground data
Examination of uncertainty in per unit area estimates of above ground biomass using terrestrial LiDAR and ground data
In estimating aboveground forest biomass (AGB), three sources of error that interact and propagate include: (1) measurement error, the quality of the tree-level measurement data used as inputs for the individual-tree equations; (2) model error, the uncertainty about the equations of the individual trees; and (3) sampling error, the uncertainty due to having obtained a probabilistic or purposive sample, rather than a census, of the trees on a given area of forest land. Monte Carlo simulations were used to examine measurement, model and sampling error, and to compare total uncertainty between models, and between a phase-based terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) and traditional forest inventory instruments. Input variables for the equations were diameter at breast height, total tree height and height to crown base; these were extracted from the terrestrial LiDAR data. Relative contributions for measurement, model and sampling error were 5%, 70% and 25%, respectively when using TLS, and 11%, 66% and 23%, respectively when using the traditional inventory measurements as inputs into the models. We conclude that the use of TLS can reduce measurement errors of AGB compared to traditional measurement approaches.
706-715
Shettles, M.
2c5de3b6-4ce3-4688-9f8e-07dd13760363
Hilker, T.
c7fb75b8-320d-49df-84ba-96c9ee523d40
Temesgen, H.
62942b29-1190-48fc-a1d0-3e9b3e7dbcaf
Shettles, M.
2c5de3b6-4ce3-4688-9f8e-07dd13760363
Hilker, T.
c7fb75b8-320d-49df-84ba-96c9ee523d40
Temesgen, H.
62942b29-1190-48fc-a1d0-3e9b3e7dbcaf
Shettles, M., Hilker, T. and Temesgen, H.
(2016)
Examination of uncertainty in per unit area estimates of above ground biomass using terrestrial LiDAR and ground data.
Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 46, .
(doi:10.1139/cjfr-2015-0265).
Abstract
In estimating aboveground forest biomass (AGB), three sources of error that interact and propagate include: (1) measurement error, the quality of the tree-level measurement data used as inputs for the individual-tree equations; (2) model error, the uncertainty about the equations of the individual trees; and (3) sampling error, the uncertainty due to having obtained a probabilistic or purposive sample, rather than a census, of the trees on a given area of forest land. Monte Carlo simulations were used to examine measurement, model and sampling error, and to compare total uncertainty between models, and between a phase-based terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) and traditional forest inventory instruments. Input variables for the equations were diameter at breast height, total tree height and height to crown base; these were extracted from the terrestrial LiDAR data. Relative contributions for measurement, model and sampling error were 5%, 70% and 25%, respectively when using TLS, and 11%, 66% and 23%, respectively when using the traditional inventory measurements as inputs into the models. We conclude that the use of TLS can reduce measurement errors of AGB compared to traditional measurement approaches.
Text
cjfr-2015-0265.pdf
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
cjfr-2015-0265.pdf
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 21 February 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 25 February 2016
Organisations:
Earth Surface Dynamics
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 384664
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/384664
ISSN: 0045-5067
PURE UUID: 97d0b314-242f-4524-8388-d7afc5f73256
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Apr 2016 08:06
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 22:02
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
M. Shettles
Author:
T. Hilker
Author:
H. Temesgen
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics