Tracking the truth: The effect of face familiarity on eye fixations during deception
Tracking the truth: The effect of face familiarity on eye fixations during deception
In forensic investigations, suspects sometimes conceal recognition of a familiar person to protect co-conspirators or hide knowledge of a victim. The current experiment sought to determine if eye fixations could be used to identify memory of known persons when lying about recognition of faces. Participants’ eye movements were monitored whilst they lied and told the truth about recognition of faces that varied in familiarity (newly learned, famous celebrities, personally known). Memory detection by eye movements during recognition of personally familiar and famous celebrity faces was negligibly affected by lying, thereby demonstrating that detection of memory during lies is influenced by the prior learning of the face. By contrast, eye movements did not reveal lies robustly for newly learned faces. These findings support the use of eye movements as markers of memory during concealed recognition but also suggest caution when familiarity is only a consequence of one brief exposure.
1-36
Millen, Ailsa E.
abc1df35-e3bf-4126-a25e-c4cd9ddf620d
Hope, Lorraine
d2d23f6a-fb96-4521-84df-910132f979e1
Hillstrom, Anne P.
835d455d-6b9e-4ee3-a619-6249f759c66c
Vrij, Aldert
66fe550e-fb76-48e7-8655-33736befc199
Millen, Ailsa E.
abc1df35-e3bf-4126-a25e-c4cd9ddf620d
Hope, Lorraine
d2d23f6a-fb96-4521-84df-910132f979e1
Hillstrom, Anne P.
835d455d-6b9e-4ee3-a619-6249f759c66c
Vrij, Aldert
66fe550e-fb76-48e7-8655-33736befc199
Millen, Ailsa E., Hope, Lorraine, Hillstrom, Anne P. and Vrij, Aldert
(2016)
Tracking the truth: The effect of face familiarity on eye fixations during deception.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, .
(In Press)
Abstract
In forensic investigations, suspects sometimes conceal recognition of a familiar person to protect co-conspirators or hide knowledge of a victim. The current experiment sought to determine if eye fixations could be used to identify memory of known persons when lying about recognition of faces. Participants’ eye movements were monitored whilst they lied and told the truth about recognition of faces that varied in familiarity (newly learned, famous celebrities, personally known). Memory detection by eye movements during recognition of personally familiar and famous celebrity faces was negligibly affected by lying, thereby demonstrating that detection of memory during lies is influenced by the prior learning of the face. By contrast, eye movements did not reveal lies robustly for newly learned faces. These findings support the use of eye movements as markers of memory during concealed recognition but also suggest caution when familiarity is only a consequence of one brief exposure.
Text
QJEP Millen Hope Hillstrom Vrij 2016 accepted.docx
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 25 February 2016
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 388492
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/388492
ISSN: 1747-0218
PURE UUID: 3c7a68e3-0549-4464-b9c1-841507123d40
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 26 Feb 2016 14:16
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 05:24
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Ailsa E. Millen
Author:
Lorraine Hope
Author:
Anne P. Hillstrom
Author:
Aldert Vrij
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics