The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Crystallite size determination: a comparison of approaches and methods

Crystallite size determination: a comparison of approaches and methods
Crystallite size determination: a comparison of approaches and methods
Crystallite size determination based on diffraction peak broadening is a widely used technique with its origins dating back to 1918 and the publication of Scherrer’s eponymous equation. Over the years the analysis of line broadening has become more refined and various methods and approaches have been adopted. These range from single peak analysis to full pattern fitting and fundamental parameter approaches. The key to all these methods is the correct characterisation of the instrumental broadening of the diffractometer and an appreciation of the likely microstructure of the sample.

This work will present a comparison of the various approaches currently available to researchers and attempt to validate these against other methods such as Scanning Electron Microscopy. It will aim to give a sense of the reliability of the method and provide limits within which the results can be sensibly interpreted.
Light, Mark
cf57314e-6856-491b-a8d2-2dffc452e161
Clark, Sarah
8091081e-6d9d-4b0a-a97b-2a1f516ac5f9
Light, Mark
cf57314e-6856-491b-a8d2-2dffc452e161
Clark, Sarah
8091081e-6d9d-4b0a-a97b-2a1f516ac5f9

Light, Mark and Clark, Sarah (2014) Crystallite size determination: a comparison of approaches and methods. Denver X-Ray Conference - 2014, Montana, United States. 28 Jul - 01 Aug 2014.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Poster)

Abstract

Crystallite size determination based on diffraction peak broadening is a widely used technique with its origins dating back to 1918 and the publication of Scherrer’s eponymous equation. Over the years the analysis of line broadening has become more refined and various methods and approaches have been adopted. These range from single peak analysis to full pattern fitting and fundamental parameter approaches. The key to all these methods is the correct characterisation of the instrumental broadening of the diffractometer and an appreciation of the likely microstructure of the sample.

This work will present a comparison of the various approaches currently available to researchers and attempt to validate these against other methods such as Scanning Electron Microscopy. It will aim to give a sense of the reliability of the method and provide limits within which the results can be sensibly interpreted.

Slideshow
DXC2014_Poster_Light.pptx - Other
Download (1MB)

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 28 July 2014
Venue - Dates: Denver X-Ray Conference - 2014, Montana, United States, 2014-07-28 - 2014-08-01

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 390706
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/390706
PURE UUID: 3f32f53c-9f12-4217-8bad-b4a256840556
ORCID for Mark Light: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0585-0843

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Apr 2016 12:47
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:01

Export record

Contributors

Author: Mark Light ORCID iD
Author: Sarah Clark

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×