The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Pressure ulcers, indentation marks and pain from cervical spine immobilization with extrication collars and headblocks: an observational study

Pressure ulcers, indentation marks and pain from cervical spine immobilization with extrication collars and headblocks: an observational study
Pressure ulcers, indentation marks and pain from cervical spine immobilization with extrication collars and headblocks: an observational study
Objectives: To describe the occurrence and severity of pressure ulcers, indentation marks and pain from the extrication collar combined with headblocks. Furthermore, the influence of time, injury severity and patient characteristics on the development of pressure ulcers, indentation marks and pain was explored.

Design: Observational

Study Setting: Level one trauma center in the Netherlands

Participants: Adult trauma patients admitted to the Emergency Department in an extrication collar combined with headblocks.

Methods: Between January and December 2013, 342 patients were included. Study outcomes were incidence and severity of pressure ulcers, indentation marks and pain. The following dependent variables were collected: time in the cervical collar and headblocks, Glasgow Coma Scale, Mean Arterial Pressure, hemoglobin, Injury Severity Score, gender, age, and Body Mass Index.

Results: 75.4% of the patients developed a category 1 and 2.9% a category 2 pressure ulcer. Indentation marks were observed in 221 (64.6%) patients; 96 (28.1%) had severe indentation marks. Pressure ulcers and indentation marks were observed most frequently at the back, shoulders and chest. 63.2% experienced pain, of which, 38.5% experienced severe pain. Pain was mainly located at the occiput. Female patients experienced significantly more pain (NRS >3) compared to male patients (OR=2.14, 95% CI 1.21 - 3.80). None of the investigated variables significantly increased the probability of developing PUs or indentation marks.

Conclusions: The high incidence of category 1 pressure ulcers and severe indentation marks indicate an increased risk for pressure ulcer development and may well lead to more severe PU lesions. Pain due to the application of the extrication collar and headblocks may lead to undesirable movement (in order to relieve the pressure) or to bias clinical examination of the cervical spine. It is necessary to revise the current practice of cervical spine immobilization.
0020-1383
1924-31
Ham, Wietske H.W.
441a948f-330f-4480-9190-16642438c558
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
Schuurmans, Marieke J.
cb79c749-bd9b-4881-b485-695c2ba30d00
Leenen, Luke P.H.
8ea469c4-cf76-4ee4-9624-ed1e080c8f2a
Ham, Wietske H.W.
441a948f-330f-4480-9190-16642438c558
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
Schuurmans, Marieke J.
cb79c749-bd9b-4881-b485-695c2ba30d00
Leenen, Luke P.H.
8ea469c4-cf76-4ee4-9624-ed1e080c8f2a

Ham, Wietske H.W., Schoonhoven, Lisette, Schuurmans, Marieke J. and Leenen, Luke P.H. (2016) Pressure ulcers, indentation marks and pain from cervical spine immobilization with extrication collars and headblocks: an observational study. Injury, 47 (9), 1924-31. (doi:10.1016/j.injury.2016.03.032).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the occurrence and severity of pressure ulcers, indentation marks and pain from the extrication collar combined with headblocks. Furthermore, the influence of time, injury severity and patient characteristics on the development of pressure ulcers, indentation marks and pain was explored.

Design: Observational

Study Setting: Level one trauma center in the Netherlands

Participants: Adult trauma patients admitted to the Emergency Department in an extrication collar combined with headblocks.

Methods: Between January and December 2013, 342 patients were included. Study outcomes were incidence and severity of pressure ulcers, indentation marks and pain. The following dependent variables were collected: time in the cervical collar and headblocks, Glasgow Coma Scale, Mean Arterial Pressure, hemoglobin, Injury Severity Score, gender, age, and Body Mass Index.

Results: 75.4% of the patients developed a category 1 and 2.9% a category 2 pressure ulcer. Indentation marks were observed in 221 (64.6%) patients; 96 (28.1%) had severe indentation marks. Pressure ulcers and indentation marks were observed most frequently at the back, shoulders and chest. 63.2% experienced pain, of which, 38.5% experienced severe pain. Pain was mainly located at the occiput. Female patients experienced significantly more pain (NRS >3) compared to male patients (OR=2.14, 95% CI 1.21 - 3.80). None of the investigated variables significantly increased the probability of developing PUs or indentation marks.

Conclusions: The high incidence of category 1 pressure ulcers and severe indentation marks indicate an increased risk for pressure ulcer development and may well lead to more severe PU lesions. Pain due to the application of the extrication collar and headblocks may lead to undesirable movement (in order to relieve the pressure) or to bias clinical examination of the cervical spine. It is necessary to revise the current practice of cervical spine immobilization.

Text
Pressuer ulcers indentation marks and pain from cervical spine immobilisation - accepted.docx - Accepted Manuscript
Download (224kB)
Text
Pressure ulcers, indentation marks and pain from cervical spine immobilization with extrication collars and headblocks an observational study.docx - Accepted Manuscript
Download (157kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 25 March 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 22 April 2016
Published date: September 2016
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 393025
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/393025
ISSN: 0020-1383
PURE UUID: 4c3166a6-7119-40fb-9efa-dbaa49821f6e
ORCID for Lisette Schoonhoven: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7129-3766

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Apr 2016 10:02
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 05:30

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Wietske H.W. Ham
Author: Marieke J. Schuurmans
Author: Luke P.H. Leenen

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×