The dilemmas of pursuing 'throughput legitimacy' through participatory mechanisms
The dilemmas of pursuing 'throughput legitimacy' through participatory mechanisms
Under pressure to open up the 'black box' of governance, technocratic bodies are increasingly seeking to include civil society participation in the policy process. We draw on empirical cases from the European Commission and NHS England to assess the extent to which the participatory mechanisms pursued by these institutions have been successful in eliciting 'throughput legitimacy'. We show that though these mechanisms have taken very different forms—the former a classic instance of 'window dressing' participation, the latter closer to 'best practice' in this field—they nevertheless share a number of ongoing vulnerabilities. We outline the shared organizational, operational and existential dilemmas that technocratic bodies face when eliciting civil society participation, and highlight their reliance on backstage negotiation to sustain stakeholder buy-in. We conclude by highlighting the prospect that the pursuit of throughput legitimacy for technocratic bodies entails inherent limitations and contradictions.
throughput legitimacy, public administration, participation, democratic governance
459-478
Iusmen, Ingi
696395c1-d60e-4fbd-aa2b-98aeecaa64b2
Boswell, John
34bad0df-3d4d-40ce-948f-65871e3d783c
Iusmen, Ingi
696395c1-d60e-4fbd-aa2b-98aeecaa64b2
Boswell, John
34bad0df-3d4d-40ce-948f-65871e3d783c
Iusmen, Ingi and Boswell, John
(2016)
The dilemmas of pursuing 'throughput legitimacy' through participatory mechanisms.
West European Politics, 40 (2), .
(doi:10.1080/01402382.2016.1206380).
Abstract
Under pressure to open up the 'black box' of governance, technocratic bodies are increasingly seeking to include civil society participation in the policy process. We draw on empirical cases from the European Commission and NHS England to assess the extent to which the participatory mechanisms pursued by these institutions have been successful in eliciting 'throughput legitimacy'. We show that though these mechanisms have taken very different forms—the former a classic instance of 'window dressing' participation, the latter closer to 'best practice' in this field—they nevertheless share a number of ongoing vulnerabilities. We outline the shared organizational, operational and existential dilemmas that technocratic bodies face when eliciting civil society participation, and highlight their reliance on backstage negotiation to sustain stakeholder buy-in. We conclude by highlighting the prospect that the pursuit of throughput legitimacy for technocratic bodies entails inherent limitations and contradictions.
Text
WEP article_FINAL.docx
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 14 June 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 3 August 2016
Additional Information:
Funded by ESRC: The EU Human Rights Regime: Policy Feedback and Children's Rights (PTA-026-27-2846)
Keywords:
throughput legitimacy, public administration, participation, democratic governance
Organisations:
Politics & International Relations
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 397171
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/397171
ISSN: 0140-2382
PURE UUID: 7ded9385-53c1-4d1b-9862-1e1387776dbe
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 21 Jun 2016 15:25
Last modified: 30 Aug 2024 01:46
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
