The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A modelling tool for capacity planning in acute and community stroke services

A modelling tool for capacity planning in acute and community stroke services
A modelling tool for capacity planning in acute and community stroke services
Background: Mathematical capacity planning methods that can take account of variations in patient complexity, admission rates and delayed discharges have long been available, but their implementation in complex pathways such as stroke care remains limited. Instead simple average based estimates are commonplace. These methods often substantially underestimate capacity requirements. We analyse the capacity requirements for acute and community stroke services in a pathway with over 630 admissions per year. We sought to identify current capacity bottlenecks affecting patient flow, future capacity requirements in the presence of increased admissions, the impact of co-location and pooling of the acute and rehabilitation units and the impact of patient subgroups on capacity requirements. We contrast these results to the often used method of planning by average occupancy, often with arbitrary uplifts to cater for variability.

Methods: We developed a discrete-event simulation model using aggregate parameter values derived from routine administrative data on over 2000 anonymised admission and discharge timestamps. The model mimicked the flow of stroke, high risk TIA and complex neurological patients from admission to an acute ward through to community rehab and early supported discharge, and predicted the probability of admission delays.

Results: An increase from 10 to 14 acute beds reduces the number of patients experiencing a delay to the acute stroke unit from 1 in every 7 to 1 in 50. Co-location of the acute and rehabilitation units and pooling eight beds out of a total bed stock of 26 reduce the number of delayed acute admissions to 1 in every 29 and the number of delayed rehabilitation admissions to 1 in every 20. Planning by average occupancy would resulted in delays for 1 in every 5 patients in the acute stroke unit.

Conclusions: Planning by average occupancy fails to provide appropriate reserve capacity to manage the variations seen in stroke pathways to desired service levels. An appropriate uplift from the average cannot be based simply on occupancy figures. Our method draws on long available, intuitive, but underused mathematical techniques for capacity planning. Implementation via simulation at our study hospital provided valuable decision support for planners to assess future bed numbers and organisation of the acute and rehabilitation services.
1472-6963
1-19
Monks, Thomas
fece343c-106d-461d-a1dd-71c1772627ca
Worthington, David
ab73db70-8d63-4991-b743-c0c2f8ca6c47
Allen, Micheal
fd639d5e-4e85-40bb-8380-92da6c858d15
Pitt, Martin
754f5149-06d7-461b-8632-9bda2c79095e
Stein, Ken
dba3ca57-81c5-4172-a80e-2b38f61a7cc1
James, Martin A.
b77536bf-9471-436c-a95e-c921e4f90f5a
Monks, Thomas
fece343c-106d-461d-a1dd-71c1772627ca
Worthington, David
ab73db70-8d63-4991-b743-c0c2f8ca6c47
Allen, Micheal
fd639d5e-4e85-40bb-8380-92da6c858d15
Pitt, Martin
754f5149-06d7-461b-8632-9bda2c79095e
Stein, Ken
dba3ca57-81c5-4172-a80e-2b38f61a7cc1
James, Martin A.
b77536bf-9471-436c-a95e-c921e4f90f5a

Monks, Thomas, Worthington, David and Allen, Micheal et al. (2016) A modelling tool for capacity planning in acute and community stroke services. BMC Health Services Research, 16, 1-19. (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1789-4).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Mathematical capacity planning methods that can take account of variations in patient complexity, admission rates and delayed discharges have long been available, but their implementation in complex pathways such as stroke care remains limited. Instead simple average based estimates are commonplace. These methods often substantially underestimate capacity requirements. We analyse the capacity requirements for acute and community stroke services in a pathway with over 630 admissions per year. We sought to identify current capacity bottlenecks affecting patient flow, future capacity requirements in the presence of increased admissions, the impact of co-location and pooling of the acute and rehabilitation units and the impact of patient subgroups on capacity requirements. We contrast these results to the often used method of planning by average occupancy, often with arbitrary uplifts to cater for variability.

Methods: We developed a discrete-event simulation model using aggregate parameter values derived from routine administrative data on over 2000 anonymised admission and discharge timestamps. The model mimicked the flow of stroke, high risk TIA and complex neurological patients from admission to an acute ward through to community rehab and early supported discharge, and predicted the probability of admission delays.

Results: An increase from 10 to 14 acute beds reduces the number of patients experiencing a delay to the acute stroke unit from 1 in every 7 to 1 in 50. Co-location of the acute and rehabilitation units and pooling eight beds out of a total bed stock of 26 reduce the number of delayed acute admissions to 1 in every 29 and the number of delayed rehabilitation admissions to 1 in every 20. Planning by average occupancy would resulted in delays for 1 in every 5 patients in the acute stroke unit.

Conclusions: Planning by average occupancy fails to provide appropriate reserve capacity to manage the variations seen in stroke pathways to desired service levels. An appropriate uplift from the average cannot be based simply on occupancy figures. Our method draws on long available, intuitive, but underused mathematical techniques for capacity planning. Implementation via simulation at our study hospital provided valuable decision support for planners to assess future bed numbers and organisation of the acute and rehabilitation services.

Text
20160824_Manuscript_R3.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Other.
Download (313kB)
Text
Appendix.pdf - Other
Available under License Other.
Download (475kB)
Archive
figures.zip - Other
Available under License Other.
Download (368kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 21 September 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 29 September 2016
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 400888
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/400888
ISSN: 1472-6963
PURE UUID: e5878ccf-2d80-4e50-8952-6da4447720fa
ORCID for Thomas Monks: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2631-4481

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Sep 2016 10:09
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:31

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Thomas Monks ORCID iD
Author: David Worthington
Author: Micheal Allen
Author: Martin Pitt
Author: Ken Stein
Author: Martin A. James

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×