The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Approaches to biofilm-associated infections: the need for standardized and relevant biofilm methods for clinical applications

Approaches to biofilm-associated infections: the need for standardized and relevant biofilm methods for clinical applications
Approaches to biofilm-associated infections: the need for standardized and relevant biofilm methods for clinical applications
Introduction: The concept of biofilms in human health and disease is now widely accepted as cause of chronic infection. Typically, biofilms show remarkable tolerance to many forms of treatments and the host immune response. This has led to vast increase in research to identify new (and sometimes old) anti-biofilm strategies that demonstrate effectiveness against these tolerant phenotypes.

Areas covered: Unfortunately, a standardized methodological approach of biofilm models has not been adopted leading to a large disparity between testing conditions. This has made it almost impossible to compare data across multiple laboratories, leaving large gaps in the evidence. Furthermore, many biofilm models testing anti-biofilm strategies aimed at the medical arena have not considered the matter of relevance to an intended application. This may explain why some in vitro models based on methodological designs that do not consider relevance to an intended application fail when applied in vivo at the clinical level.

Expert commentary: This review will explore the issues that need to be considered in developing performance standards for anti-biofilm therapeutics and provide a rationale for the need to standardize models/methods that are clinically relevant. We also provide some rational as to why no standards currently exist.
biofilm, standard methods, mbec, effectiveness
1744-8336
1-21
Malone, Matthew
4743c7e3-de3c-4735-9409-c92846b5b0ee
Goeres, Darla M.
8dd62f50-51de-4213-9d2c-d054c4c58e06
Gosbell, Iain
661e16f2-af64-44d0-8fb8-953e30b6b224
Vickery, Karen
4ed0cc94-718e-4048-8d1b-cf11f1044db6
Jensen, Slade
5492c25c-d36e-4e63-b5eb-06911cee3d3d
Stoodley, Paul
08614665-92a9-4466-806e-20c6daeb483f
Malone, Matthew
4743c7e3-de3c-4735-9409-c92846b5b0ee
Goeres, Darla M.
8dd62f50-51de-4213-9d2c-d054c4c58e06
Gosbell, Iain
661e16f2-af64-44d0-8fb8-953e30b6b224
Vickery, Karen
4ed0cc94-718e-4048-8d1b-cf11f1044db6
Jensen, Slade
5492c25c-d36e-4e63-b5eb-06911cee3d3d
Stoodley, Paul
08614665-92a9-4466-806e-20c6daeb483f

Malone, Matthew, Goeres, Darla M., Gosbell, Iain, Vickery, Karen, Jensen, Slade and Stoodley, Paul (2016) Approaches to biofilm-associated infections: the need for standardized and relevant biofilm methods for clinical applications. Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy, 1-21. (doi:10.1080/14787210.2017.1262257).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction: The concept of biofilms in human health and disease is now widely accepted as cause of chronic infection. Typically, biofilms show remarkable tolerance to many forms of treatments and the host immune response. This has led to vast increase in research to identify new (and sometimes old) anti-biofilm strategies that demonstrate effectiveness against these tolerant phenotypes.

Areas covered: Unfortunately, a standardized methodological approach of biofilm models has not been adopted leading to a large disparity between testing conditions. This has made it almost impossible to compare data across multiple laboratories, leaving large gaps in the evidence. Furthermore, many biofilm models testing anti-biofilm strategies aimed at the medical arena have not considered the matter of relevance to an intended application. This may explain why some in vitro models based on methodological designs that do not consider relevance to an intended application fail when applied in vivo at the clinical level.

Expert commentary: This review will explore the issues that need to be considered in developing performance standards for anti-biofilm therapeutics and provide a rationale for the need to standardize models/methods that are clinically relevant. We also provide some rational as to why no standards currently exist.

Text
__filestore.soton.ac.uk_users_fh1d15_mydesktop_paul.docx - Accepted Manuscript
Download (475kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 15 November 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 18 November 2016
Keywords: biofilm, standard methods, mbec, effectiveness
Organisations: Bioengineering Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 403273
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/403273
ISSN: 1744-8336
PURE UUID: f5dd1477-fe8e-4141-946b-52f6289f1ca3
ORCID for Paul Stoodley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6069-273X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Nov 2016 14:21
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Matthew Malone
Author: Darla M. Goeres
Author: Iain Gosbell
Author: Karen Vickery
Author: Slade Jensen
Author: Paul Stoodley ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×