The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Intermittent catheterisation after Botulinum toxin injections: the time to reassess our practice

Intermittent catheterisation after Botulinum toxin injections: the time to reassess our practice
Intermittent catheterisation after Botulinum toxin injections: the time to reassess our practice
Introduction

Botulinum toxin has become a widely adopted treatment for patients with recalcitrant overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms. Some recommend the institution of clean intermittent self- catheterisation (CISC) if a post void residual exceeds 200 mls post treatment but there is no evidence for this recommendation. The aim of this study was to identify whether abstinence from CISC as a routine strategy for patients with a post void residual (PVR), post intra-detrusor botulinum toxin injections, is associated with any measureable adversity.

Methods

This was a cohort observation study. Patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) attending a medical urology centre were observed pre and post botulinum toxin treatment. Intra-detrusal botulinum toxin injections were administered in the day treatment centre at a medical urology centre in London, United Kingdom. Patients were reviewed at follow up consultations to measure PVR.

Results

240 patients were studied; there were 215 women and 25 males. 196 patients (82%) received botulinum toxin injections and were not managed with CISC. 18% were using CISC prior to injections and continued. None of the 196 developed acute retention or significant voiding symptoms.

Conclusions

Our study indicates that routine administration of CISC based on an arbitrary PVR volume is unlikely to confer benefit. In order to avoid patients being deterred from botulinum treatment we recommend that CISC be reserved for those who have troublesome voiding symptoms as well as a raised PVR. It is unlikely that CISC, initiated on the basis of an arbitrary PVR volume would benefit the patient.
0937-3462
1-22
Collins, Linda
d30439af-1969-46a7-b6b6-88e1e95af49d
Sathiananthamoorthy, Sanchutha
d37e8995-62c3-4122-9a5d-21beffcc7ebb
Fader, Mandy
c318f942-2ddb-462a-9183-8b678faf7277
Maolone-Lee, James
b620ab9f-2e1a-440f-908d-57ff9f5b02e3
Collins, Linda
d30439af-1969-46a7-b6b6-88e1e95af49d
Sathiananthamoorthy, Sanchutha
d37e8995-62c3-4122-9a5d-21beffcc7ebb
Fader, Mandy
c318f942-2ddb-462a-9183-8b678faf7277
Maolone-Lee, James
b620ab9f-2e1a-440f-908d-57ff9f5b02e3

Collins, Linda, Sathiananthamoorthy, Sanchutha, Fader, Mandy and Maolone-Lee, James (2017) Intermittent catheterisation after Botulinum toxin injections: the time to reassess our practice. International Urogynecology Journal, 1-22. (In Press)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction

Botulinum toxin has become a widely adopted treatment for patients with recalcitrant overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms. Some recommend the institution of clean intermittent self- catheterisation (CISC) if a post void residual exceeds 200 mls post treatment but there is no evidence for this recommendation. The aim of this study was to identify whether abstinence from CISC as a routine strategy for patients with a post void residual (PVR), post intra-detrusor botulinum toxin injections, is associated with any measureable adversity.

Methods

This was a cohort observation study. Patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) attending a medical urology centre were observed pre and post botulinum toxin treatment. Intra-detrusal botulinum toxin injections were administered in the day treatment centre at a medical urology centre in London, United Kingdom. Patients were reviewed at follow up consultations to measure PVR.

Results

240 patients were studied; there were 215 women and 25 males. 196 patients (82%) received botulinum toxin injections and were not managed with CISC. 18% were using CISC prior to injections and continued. None of the 196 developed acute retention or significant voiding symptoms.

Conclusions

Our study indicates that routine administration of CISC based on an arbitrary PVR volume is unlikely to confer benefit. In order to avoid patients being deterred from botulinum treatment we recommend that CISC be reserved for those who have troublesome voiding symptoms as well as a raised PVR. It is unlikely that CISC, initiated on the basis of an arbitrary PVR volume would benefit the patient.

Text
Intermittent Catheterisation after Botulinum Toxin injection The time to reassess our practice.docx - Accepted Manuscript
Download (377kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 4 January 2017
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 404706
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/404706
ISSN: 0937-3462
PURE UUID: 653379ad-d3c7-49c7-b301-4f0c50202bac

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Jan 2017 17:21
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:13

Export record

Contributors

Author: Linda Collins
Author: Sanchutha Sathiananthamoorthy
Author: Mandy Fader
Author: James Maolone-Lee

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×