What makes evidence-based policymaking such a useful myth?: The case of NICE guidance on bariatric surgery in the UK
Boswell, John (2017) What makes evidence-based policymaking such a useful myth?: The case of NICE guidance on bariatric surgery in the UK Governance
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 18 May 2017.
Available under License University of Southampton Accepted Manuscript Licence.
There is widespread scepticism among policy scholars and practitioners about the move to rationalise policy making: the naive vision of ‘evidence-based policy’ is often contrasted with the reality of ‘policy-based evidence’. Yet the language of evidence-based policy making (EBPM) continues to dominate policy debate about complex and contested issues. In this paper, I explore this apparent paradox by looking at what makes EBPM such a useful myth for all sorts of policy actors. I do so with reference to the pioneering work of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), focusing specifically on its work in relation to bariatric surgery, a suite of controversial and drastic weight loss procedures. I show that the myth of EBPM has political, pragmatic and procedural utility in practice, allowing the organisation to set and administer guidelines on this uncertain, complex and contested treatment in ways which sustain buy-in and enable ongoing contestation.
|Keywords:||Evidence-based policy making; rationality; policy practice; obesity; NICE|
|Organisations:||Politics & International Relations|
|Date Deposited:||10 Mar 2017 10:47|
|Last Modified:||16 Apr 2017 17:13|
|Further Information:||Google Scholar|
|RDF:||RDF+N-Triples, RDF+N3, RDF+XML, Browse.|
Actions (login required)