Can the MABC discriminate and predict motor impairment? A comparison of Brazilian and American children
Can the MABC discriminate and predict motor impairment? A comparison of Brazilian and American children
Background: Estimates of the prevalence of developmental coordination disorder range from 1.7% to 19%, raising concerns about the discriminative ability of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (MABC).
Aims: We compared MABC performance of children from the United States and Brazil aged 4–12 years. We aimed to examine: a) the prevalence of motor impairment across countries; b) age band and sex differences across countries; c) the test’s ability to discriminate and predict motor impairment; and d) to
identify the discriminating capacity of each MABC subtest.
Methods: Children (n=1055) from Brazil and the United States were included in the present study. MABC cut-off points (typical development: above 15%, at risk: 6–15%; developmental coordination disorder: 0–5%) and discriminant analyses were used.
Findings: Prevalence of probable developmental coordination disorder (24.1%) and at risk (16.2%) was higher in the Brazilian sample. Higher prevalence of probable developmental coordination disorder was observed among girls and among children aged 11–12 years old for the Brazilian sample and among boys and among children aged 9–12 years old for the American sample. Differences in scores across countries were only observed for children with typical development in manual dexterity and balance skills. The MABC discriminant functions were able to predict the classification of children into typical development, at risk, and probable developmental coordination disorder. The manual dexterity subtest was the strongest predictor for both samples, whereas the ball skills subtest was the weakest predictor.
Conclusions: Differences for prevalence were found across countries. American results were similar with current estimates relative to incidence and gender; for Brazilian children, prevalence was near three times higher and more persistent among girls. Overall, in both countries the motor difficulties demonstrated by children with probable and at risk of developmental coordination disorder were similar for all tasks. The MABC showed predictably and discriminant capacity in the identification of children with probable and at risk developmental coordination disorder in both countries.
■ Developmental coordination disorder ■ Motor performance ■ Movement Assessment
Valentini, Nadia C.
4a3153df-c0f6-427b-a539-d11d1ed3f3d7
Oliveira, Marcio A.
0f1060fd-89ac-471e-a741-ab130a6af84f
Pangelinan, Melissa M.
f4092df2-72e2-4573-aa47-4fb2dd54e5ca
Whitall, Jill
9761aefb-be80-4270-bc1f-0e726399376e
Clark, Jane E.
7efb6194-0808-4e9d-9398-7f006e3001fb
March 2017
Valentini, Nadia C.
4a3153df-c0f6-427b-a539-d11d1ed3f3d7
Oliveira, Marcio A.
0f1060fd-89ac-471e-a741-ab130a6af84f
Pangelinan, Melissa M.
f4092df2-72e2-4573-aa47-4fb2dd54e5ca
Whitall, Jill
9761aefb-be80-4270-bc1f-0e726399376e
Clark, Jane E.
7efb6194-0808-4e9d-9398-7f006e3001fb
Valentini, Nadia C., Oliveira, Marcio A., Pangelinan, Melissa M., Whitall, Jill and Clark, Jane E.
(2017)
Can the MABC discriminate and predict motor impairment? A comparison of Brazilian and American children.
International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 24 (3).
(doi:10.12968/ijtr.2017.24.3.105).
Abstract
Background: Estimates of the prevalence of developmental coordination disorder range from 1.7% to 19%, raising concerns about the discriminative ability of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (MABC).
Aims: We compared MABC performance of children from the United States and Brazil aged 4–12 years. We aimed to examine: a) the prevalence of motor impairment across countries; b) age band and sex differences across countries; c) the test’s ability to discriminate and predict motor impairment; and d) to
identify the discriminating capacity of each MABC subtest.
Methods: Children (n=1055) from Brazil and the United States were included in the present study. MABC cut-off points (typical development: above 15%, at risk: 6–15%; developmental coordination disorder: 0–5%) and discriminant analyses were used.
Findings: Prevalence of probable developmental coordination disorder (24.1%) and at risk (16.2%) was higher in the Brazilian sample. Higher prevalence of probable developmental coordination disorder was observed among girls and among children aged 11–12 years old for the Brazilian sample and among boys and among children aged 9–12 years old for the American sample. Differences in scores across countries were only observed for children with typical development in manual dexterity and balance skills. The MABC discriminant functions were able to predict the classification of children into typical development, at risk, and probable developmental coordination disorder. The manual dexterity subtest was the strongest predictor for both samples, whereas the ball skills subtest was the weakest predictor.
Conclusions: Differences for prevalence were found across countries. American results were similar with current estimates relative to incidence and gender; for Brazilian children, prevalence was near three times higher and more persistent among girls. Overall, in both countries the motor difficulties demonstrated by children with probable and at risk of developmental coordination disorder were similar for all tasks. The MABC showed predictably and discriminant capacity in the identification of children with probable and at risk developmental coordination disorder in both countries.
Text
Can the MABC discriminate and predict motor impairment? A comparison of Brazilian and American children
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
Can the MABC discriminate and predict motor impairment? A comparison of Brazilian and American children
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 3 January 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 8 March 2017
Published date: March 2017
Keywords:
■ Developmental coordination disorder ■ Motor performance ■ Movement Assessment
Organisations:
Researcher Development
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 407640
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/407640
ISSN: 1741-1645
PURE UUID: c15145b8-0b35-44ff-a414-597cde84b495
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 Apr 2017 17:08
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 05:05
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Nadia C. Valentini
Author:
Marcio A. Oliveira
Author:
Melissa M. Pangelinan
Author:
Jill Whitall
Author:
Jane E. Clark
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics