The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Clinicians' interpretations of point of care urine culture versus laboratory culture results: analysis from the four-country POETIC trial of diagnosis of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in primary care

Clinicians' interpretations of point of care urine culture versus laboratory culture results: analysis from the four-country POETIC trial of diagnosis of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in primary care
Clinicians' interpretations of point of care urine culture versus laboratory culture results: analysis from the four-country POETIC trial of diagnosis of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in primary care
Background.: Urine culture at the point of care minimises delay between obtaining the sample and agar inoculation in a microbiology laboratory, and quantification and sensitivity results can be available more rapidly in primary care.

Objective.: To identify the degree to which clinicians' interpretations of a point-of-care-test (POCT) urine culture (Flexicult™ SSI-Urinary Kit) agrees with laboratory culture in women presenting to primary care with symptoms of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTI).

Methods.: Primary care clinicians used the Flexicult™-POCT, recorded their findings and took a photograph of the result, which was interpreted by microbiology laboratory technicians. Urine samples were additionally processed in routine care laboratories. Cross tabulations were used to identify important differences in organism identification, quantification and antibiotic susceptibility between these three sources of data. The influence of various laboratory definitions for UTI on culture were assessed.

Results.: Primary care clinicians identified 202/289 urine samples (69.9%) as positive for UTI using the Flexicult™-POCT, whereas laboratory culture identified 94-190 (32.5-65.7%) as positive, depending on definition thresholds. 82.9% of samples identified positive for E. coli on laboratory culture were also considered positive for E. coli using the Flexicult™ -POCT, and susceptibilities were reasonably concordant. There were major discrepancies between laboratory staff interpretation of Flexicult™ photographs, clinicians' interpretation of the Flexicult™ test, and laboratory culture results.

Conclusion.:

Flexicult™-POCT overestimated the positivity rate of urine samples for UTI when laboratory culture was used as the reference standard. However, it is unclear whether point-of-care or laboratory based urine culture provides the most valid diagnostic information.
0263-2136
Hullegie, S.
bd8acc67-0386-4de7-a3ab-342f4cb91334
Wootton, M.
95cc08ff-6847-404b-96f8-df031c3ebfaa
Verheij, T.J.
4fbbac92-a36e-4aac-a66c-6bb18e4235c9
Bates, J.
a3b515cc-cfb0-40b2-a472-0aa86fd5e8ce
Hood, K.
8e83cf99-094d-4afe-90e5-bcb0c9144821
Gal, M.
49434557-9212-4376-9f60-63b4df70dcb2
Francis, N.A.
8b0877b2-4871-4c0e-8062-58ef236e769e
Little, P.
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Moore, M.
1be81dad-7120-45f0-bbed-f3b0cc0cfe99
Llor, C.
760f7e58-4f1b-4b0c-a66b-ad6db93a985e
Pickles, T.
e3fe9652-c8f4-4d1c-b07c-7acd132059c1
Gillespie, D.
3af2aef2-5be1-490c-850c-7098d399dc2e
Kirby, N.
6d88b8a1-171c-4b93-8521-af544f82c803
Brugman, C.
88e4010a-c3da-4437-b63f-536fbebfaec1
Butler, C.C.
8bf4cace-c34a-4b65-838f-29c2be91e434
Hullegie, S.
bd8acc67-0386-4de7-a3ab-342f4cb91334
Wootton, M.
95cc08ff-6847-404b-96f8-df031c3ebfaa
Verheij, T.J.
4fbbac92-a36e-4aac-a66c-6bb18e4235c9
Bates, J.
a3b515cc-cfb0-40b2-a472-0aa86fd5e8ce
Hood, K.
8e83cf99-094d-4afe-90e5-bcb0c9144821
Gal, M.
49434557-9212-4376-9f60-63b4df70dcb2
Francis, N.A.
8b0877b2-4871-4c0e-8062-58ef236e769e
Little, P.
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Moore, M.
1be81dad-7120-45f0-bbed-f3b0cc0cfe99
Llor, C.
760f7e58-4f1b-4b0c-a66b-ad6db93a985e
Pickles, T.
e3fe9652-c8f4-4d1c-b07c-7acd132059c1
Gillespie, D.
3af2aef2-5be1-490c-850c-7098d399dc2e
Kirby, N.
6d88b8a1-171c-4b93-8521-af544f82c803
Brugman, C.
88e4010a-c3da-4437-b63f-536fbebfaec1
Butler, C.C.
8bf4cace-c34a-4b65-838f-29c2be91e434

Hullegie, S., Wootton, M., Verheij, T.J., Bates, J., Hood, K., Gal, M., Francis, N.A., Little, P., Moore, M., Llor, C., Pickles, T., Gillespie, D., Kirby, N., Brugman, C. and Butler, C.C. (2017) Clinicians' interpretations of point of care urine culture versus laboratory culture results: analysis from the four-country POETIC trial of diagnosis of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in primary care. Family Practice. (doi:10.1093/fampra/cmx009).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background.: Urine culture at the point of care minimises delay between obtaining the sample and agar inoculation in a microbiology laboratory, and quantification and sensitivity results can be available more rapidly in primary care.

Objective.: To identify the degree to which clinicians' interpretations of a point-of-care-test (POCT) urine culture (Flexicult™ SSI-Urinary Kit) agrees with laboratory culture in women presenting to primary care with symptoms of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTI).

Methods.: Primary care clinicians used the Flexicult™-POCT, recorded their findings and took a photograph of the result, which was interpreted by microbiology laboratory technicians. Urine samples were additionally processed in routine care laboratories. Cross tabulations were used to identify important differences in organism identification, quantification and antibiotic susceptibility between these three sources of data. The influence of various laboratory definitions for UTI on culture were assessed.

Results.: Primary care clinicians identified 202/289 urine samples (69.9%) as positive for UTI using the Flexicult™-POCT, whereas laboratory culture identified 94-190 (32.5-65.7%) as positive, depending on definition thresholds. 82.9% of samples identified positive for E. coli on laboratory culture were also considered positive for E. coli using the Flexicult™ -POCT, and susceptibilities were reasonably concordant. There were major discrepancies between laboratory staff interpretation of Flexicult™ photographs, clinicians' interpretation of the Flexicult™ test, and laboratory culture results.

Conclusion.:

Flexicult™-POCT overestimated the positivity rate of urine samples for UTI when laboratory culture was used as the reference standard. However, it is unclear whether point-of-care or laboratory based urine culture provides the most valid diagnostic information.

Text
FAMPR-254-16 Clean copy - Accepted Manuscript
Download (97kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 22 January 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 March 2017
Organisations: Primary Care & Population Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 410648
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/410648
ISSN: 0263-2136
PURE UUID: be71c711-6845-4a1b-9657-71e8dfe3e073
ORCID for P. Little: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3664-1873
ORCID for M. Moore: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5127-4509

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Jun 2017 09:17
Last modified: 12 Jul 2024 04:06

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: S. Hullegie
Author: M. Wootton
Author: T.J. Verheij
Author: J. Bates
Author: K. Hood
Author: M. Gal
Author: N.A. Francis
Author: P. Little ORCID iD
Author: M. Moore ORCID iD
Author: C. Llor
Author: T. Pickles
Author: D. Gillespie
Author: N. Kirby
Author: C. Brugman
Author: C.C. Butler

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×