An update on allergen immunotherapy
An update on allergen immunotherapy
Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) has been used to treat allergic diseases for over a century. It is the only treatment that addresses immune dysfunction underlying allergic responses rather than simply treating symptoms or suppressing inflammation. Its safety and efficacy in allergic rhinitis, asthma and insect allergy has been documented in a number of systematic reviews but its cost effectiveness is less clear. AIT reduces symptoms and requirement for medication, while improving quality of life. Further, the effect continues for years after discontinuation of treatment. However, evidence regarding cost effectiveness is limited. During AIT, allergen extracts are administered through a subcutaneous or sublingual route for 3–5 years. Subcutaneous immunotherapy is more effective in inducing long-term remission but systemic reactions do occur occasionally. Sublingual immunotherapy is safer and more convenient for the patient but evidence regarding its long-term efficacy is patchy. AIT is used widely in western Europe and the USA. In the UK, subcutaneous immunotherapy is often used for bee and wasp allergy, while both subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapies are used for severe allergic rhinitis and occasionally for house dust mite and pet allergies. In conclusion, AIT is safe and effective and should be considered as a treatment option for those with allergic diseases.
584-587
Arshad, Syed
917e246d-2e60-472f-8d30-94b01ef28958
December 2016
Arshad, Syed
917e246d-2e60-472f-8d30-94b01ef28958
Abstract
Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) has been used to treat allergic diseases for over a century. It is the only treatment that addresses immune dysfunction underlying allergic responses rather than simply treating symptoms or suppressing inflammation. Its safety and efficacy in allergic rhinitis, asthma and insect allergy has been documented in a number of systematic reviews but its cost effectiveness is less clear. AIT reduces symptoms and requirement for medication, while improving quality of life. Further, the effect continues for years after discontinuation of treatment. However, evidence regarding cost effectiveness is limited. During AIT, allergen extracts are administered through a subcutaneous or sublingual route for 3–5 years. Subcutaneous immunotherapy is more effective in inducing long-term remission but systemic reactions do occur occasionally. Sublingual immunotherapy is safer and more convenient for the patient but evidence regarding its long-term efficacy is patchy. AIT is used widely in western Europe and the USA. In the UK, subcutaneous immunotherapy is often used for bee and wasp allergy, while both subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapies are used for severe allergic rhinitis and occasionally for house dust mite and pet allergies. In conclusion, AIT is safe and effective and should be considered as a treatment option for those with allergic diseases.
Text
An update on allergen immunotherapy-manuscript-final
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 12 September 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 7 December 2016
Published date: December 2016
Organisations:
Clinical & Experimental Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 410793
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/410793
PURE UUID: 227121fe-8d01-4753-a088-55cdb148552e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Jun 2017 09:40
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 05:10
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics