The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Keeping expertise in its place: understanding arms-length bodies as boundary organizations

Keeping expertise in its place: understanding arms-length bodies as boundary organizations
Keeping expertise in its place: understanding arms-length bodies as boundary organizations
Policy and administration scholars have struggled to explain the waxing and waning of arms-length bodies over time and across contexts. This article draws on the Science and Technology Studies' concept of boundary work — understood as practices which both demarcate and enable collaboration across distinct areas of expertise - to help explain variation in these institutional arrangements. Conceptualising arms-length bodies as boundary organizations shows how their authority rests on their capacity to enable ongoing coordination while preserving the authority and autonomy of relevant expert spheres. The article demonstrates this analytical purchase through reference to two cases in contemporary British government.
boundary work; science and technology studies; administrative reform; agencies
0305-5736
Boswell, John
34bad0df-3d4d-40ce-948f-65871e3d783c
Boswell, John
34bad0df-3d4d-40ce-948f-65871e3d783c

Boswell, John (2017) Keeping expertise in its place: understanding arms-length bodies as boundary organizations. Policy & Politics. (doi:10.1332/030557317X15052303355719).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Policy and administration scholars have struggled to explain the waxing and waning of arms-length bodies over time and across contexts. This article draws on the Science and Technology Studies' concept of boundary work — understood as practices which both demarcate and enable collaboration across distinct areas of expertise - to help explain variation in these institutional arrangements. Conceptualising arms-length bodies as boundary organizations shows how their authority rests on their capacity to enable ongoing coordination while preserving the authority and autonomy of relevant expert spheres. The article demonstrates this analytical purchase through reference to two cases in contemporary British government.

Text
Keeping_expertise_in_its_place_PandP - Accepted Manuscript
Download (62kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 25 August 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 5 October 2017
Keywords: boundary work; science and technology studies; administrative reform; agencies

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 413872
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/413872
ISSN: 0305-5736
PURE UUID: 2c064d73-fe01-4639-9660-9d3d791938b6
ORCID for John Boswell: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3018-8791

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Sep 2017 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 05:42

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×