Validity, reliability and minimal detectable change of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest in patients with end-stage renal disease
Validity, reliability and minimal detectable change of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest in patients with end-stage renal disease
Purpose: This study determined the validity, test–retest reliability and minimal detectable change of the balance evaluation systems test (BESTest), mini-balance evaluation systems test (Mini-BESTest) and brief-balance evaluation systems test (Brief-BESTest) in patients with end-stage renal disease.
Methods: A cross-sectional study with 74 patients with end-stage renal disease (male 66.2%; 63.9 ± 15.1 years old) was conducted. Participants were asked to report the number of falls during the previous 12 months and to complete the activity-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale. The BESTest was administered, and the Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest scores were computed based on the BESTest performance. Validity was assessed by correlating balance tests with each other and with the ABC scale. Test–retest relative reliability and agreement were explored with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) equation (2,1) and the Bland and Altman method. Minimal detectable changes at the 95% confidence level were established.
Results: Balance test scores were significantly correlated with each other (spearman’s correlation = 0.89–0.92) and with the ABC scale (spearman’s correlation = 0.49–0.59). Balance tests presented high test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.84–0.94), with no evidence of bias. Minimal detectable change values were 10.8 (expressed as a percentage 13.5%), 5.3 (23.7%) and 5.6 (34%) points for the BESTest, Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest, respectively.
Conclusions: All tests are valid and reliable to assess balance in patients with end-stage renal disease. Nevertheless, based on the minimal detectable changes found, BESTest and Mini-BESTest may be the most recommended tests for this specific population.
Implications for Rehabilitation
Balance evaluation systems test (BESTest), mini-balance evaluation systems test (Mini-BESTest) and brief-balance evaluation systems test (Brief-BESTest) are reliable and valid in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD).
The minimal detectable changes of 10.8 for the BESTest, 5.3 for the Mini-BESTest and 5.6 for the Brief-BESTest can be used by clinicians to identify a true change in balance over time or in response to interventions.
Based on the minimal detectable changes found, BESTest and Mini-BESTest may be the most recommended; and the selection of one of them may be based on time and equipment availability.
Jácome, Cristina
8040cfe2-c6c3-4f2b-8c55-c8569293e446
Flores, Inês
d002ed41-98f4-44b1-aa46-c9a74b143cbb
Martins, Filipa
c278b8d7-cb46-41e1-bc7c-b82889902be2
Castro, Conceição
14c26457-585f-4495-bbf9-e28856b92fc9
McPhee, Charlotte C.
ea78087b-74d9-4e89-9cce-0e3081572987
Shepherd, Ellen
4c654404-65ce-4cf8-86b3-4a2d16c38770
Demain, Sara
09b1124d-750a-4eb1-90c7-91f5f222fc31
Figueiredo, Daniela
d767c175-1d86-4b21-90f9-87915ba7be10
Marques, Alda
adcfe8d5-518a-4079-902a-130ebc68d338
Jácome, Cristina
8040cfe2-c6c3-4f2b-8c55-c8569293e446
Flores, Inês
d002ed41-98f4-44b1-aa46-c9a74b143cbb
Martins, Filipa
c278b8d7-cb46-41e1-bc7c-b82889902be2
Castro, Conceição
14c26457-585f-4495-bbf9-e28856b92fc9
McPhee, Charlotte C.
ea78087b-74d9-4e89-9cce-0e3081572987
Shepherd, Ellen
4c654404-65ce-4cf8-86b3-4a2d16c38770
Demain, Sara
09b1124d-750a-4eb1-90c7-91f5f222fc31
Figueiredo, Daniela
d767c175-1d86-4b21-90f9-87915ba7be10
Marques, Alda
adcfe8d5-518a-4079-902a-130ebc68d338
Jácome, Cristina, Flores, Inês, Martins, Filipa, Castro, Conceição, McPhee, Charlotte C., Shepherd, Ellen, Demain, Sara, Figueiredo, Daniela and Marques, Alda
(2017)
Validity, reliability and minimal detectable change of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest in patients with end-stage renal disease.
Disability and Rehabilitation.
(doi:10.1080/09638288.2017.1375034).
Abstract
Purpose: This study determined the validity, test–retest reliability and minimal detectable change of the balance evaluation systems test (BESTest), mini-balance evaluation systems test (Mini-BESTest) and brief-balance evaluation systems test (Brief-BESTest) in patients with end-stage renal disease.
Methods: A cross-sectional study with 74 patients with end-stage renal disease (male 66.2%; 63.9 ± 15.1 years old) was conducted. Participants were asked to report the number of falls during the previous 12 months and to complete the activity-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale. The BESTest was administered, and the Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest scores were computed based on the BESTest performance. Validity was assessed by correlating balance tests with each other and with the ABC scale. Test–retest relative reliability and agreement were explored with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) equation (2,1) and the Bland and Altman method. Minimal detectable changes at the 95% confidence level were established.
Results: Balance test scores were significantly correlated with each other (spearman’s correlation = 0.89–0.92) and with the ABC scale (spearman’s correlation = 0.49–0.59). Balance tests presented high test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.84–0.94), with no evidence of bias. Minimal detectable change values were 10.8 (expressed as a percentage 13.5%), 5.3 (23.7%) and 5.6 (34%) points for the BESTest, Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest, respectively.
Conclusions: All tests are valid and reliable to assess balance in patients with end-stage renal disease. Nevertheless, based on the minimal detectable changes found, BESTest and Mini-BESTest may be the most recommended tests for this specific population.
Implications for Rehabilitation
Balance evaluation systems test (BESTest), mini-balance evaluation systems test (Mini-BESTest) and brief-balance evaluation systems test (Brief-BESTest) are reliable and valid in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD).
The minimal detectable changes of 10.8 for the BESTest, 5.3 for the Mini-BESTest and 5.6 for the Brief-BESTest can be used by clinicians to identify a true change in balance over time or in response to interventions.
Based on the minimal detectable changes found, BESTest and Mini-BESTest may be the most recommended; and the selection of one of them may be based on time and equipment availability.
Text
Validity, reliability and minimal detectable change of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 30 August 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 8 September 2017
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 413941
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/413941
ISSN: 0963-8288
PURE UUID: b48e224b-16ee-4a1a-b1fc-2a617d51cfd1
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Sep 2017 16:31
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 05:42
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Cristina Jácome
Author:
Inês Flores
Author:
Filipa Martins
Author:
Conceição Castro
Author:
Charlotte C. McPhee
Author:
Ellen Shepherd
Author:
Daniela Figueiredo
Author:
Alda Marques
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics