The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Self-perception of fracture risk: what can it tell us?

Self-perception of fracture risk: what can it tell us?
Self-perception of fracture risk: what can it tell us?
Summary:

In this study, we report that self-perception of fracture risk captures some aspect of fracture risk not currently measured using conventional fracture prediction tools and is associated with improved medication uptake. It suggests that adequate appreciation of fracture risk may be beneficial and lead to greater healthcare engagement and treatment.

Introduction:

This study aimed to assess how well self-perception of fracture risk, and fracture risk as estimated by the fracture prediction tool FRAX, related to fracture incidence and uptake and persistence of anti-osteoporosis medication among women participating in the Global Longitudinal study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW).

Methods:

GLOW is an international cohort study involving 723 physician practices across 10 countries in Europe, North America and Australia. Aged ≥ 55 years, 60,393 women completed baseline questionnaires detailing medical history, including co-morbidities, fractures and self-perceived fracture risk (SPR). Annual follow-up included self-reported incident fractures and anti-osteoporosis medication (AOM) use. We calculated FRAX risk without bone mineral density measurement.

Results:

Of the 39,241 women with at least 1 year of follow-up data, 2132 (5.4%) sustained an incident major osteoporotic fracture over 5 years of follow-up. Within each SPR category, risk of fracture increased as the FRAX categorisation of risk increased. In GLOW, only 11% of women with a lower baseline SPR were taking AOM at baseline, compared with 46% of women with a higher SPR. AOM use tended to increase in the years after a reported fracture. However, women with a lower SPR who were fractured still reported lower AOM rates than women with or without a fracture but had a higher SPR.

Conclusions:

These results suggest that SPR captures some aspect of fracture risk not currently measured using conventional fracture prediction tools and is also associated with improved medication uptake.
0937-941X
3495-3500
Litwic, A.E.
5faa3ead-e7d1-4b1a-aa2d-f79444fa11e9
Compston, J.E.
ffd1eb66-ec4f-45b9-9340-04520c456c52
Wyman, A.
a8b4c72a-e84a-4eaa-8e7f-2d997612b149
Siris, E.S.
807ebdb6-38f9-4599-af19-199f8523bdce
Gehlbach, S.H.
615620f5-ef34-412c-a654-3d29d229af66
Adachi, J.D
0a13a8a2-6cf0-4a0d-828f-d98140151642
Chapurlat, R.
9435221c-55dc-4b28-a6ee-4b2a05b35674
Diez-Perez, A.
19f89c53-003a-469c-92ac-69b0b979f3ec
LaCroix, A.Z.
928235b8-c7a3-4c6f-a7f9-1c4cfc5b5b57
Nieves, J.W.
0814b902-2195-4236-817b-bb85b921269a
Netelenbos, J.C.
8ad4fa11-e5a6-47ee-b738-660ccd9d9a70
Pfeilschifter, J.
39a39944-567b-47d5-8973-630dcd32b2cc
Rossini, M.
4d5d0ab4-a01e-4060-9b7d-13723ed0ebdf
Roux, C.
fc926270-4149-405d-8cce-44d9305cc45d
Saag, K.G.
9046e2b0-8654-4058-9703-aaa49a12fd78
Silverman, S.
dfe0f214-17ef-41de-b403-7e2b3105f178
Watts, N.B.
5dac1dfe-2fee-4fb4-942d-e28c0c29fdf5
Greenspan, S.L.
69b09b9d-bff3-428b-b0cd-e746e1095159
March, L.
0cf98556-b3c8-42dd-8c50-e468d144013f
Gregson, C.L.
9e28df51-89ec-4a1e-88ff-c6010a986e96
Cooper, C.
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Dennison, E.M.
ee647287-edb4-4392-8361-e59fd505b1d1
Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW) Investigators
Litwic, A.E.
5faa3ead-e7d1-4b1a-aa2d-f79444fa11e9
Compston, J.E.
ffd1eb66-ec4f-45b9-9340-04520c456c52
Wyman, A.
a8b4c72a-e84a-4eaa-8e7f-2d997612b149
Siris, E.S.
807ebdb6-38f9-4599-af19-199f8523bdce
Gehlbach, S.H.
615620f5-ef34-412c-a654-3d29d229af66
Adachi, J.D
0a13a8a2-6cf0-4a0d-828f-d98140151642
Chapurlat, R.
9435221c-55dc-4b28-a6ee-4b2a05b35674
Diez-Perez, A.
19f89c53-003a-469c-92ac-69b0b979f3ec
LaCroix, A.Z.
928235b8-c7a3-4c6f-a7f9-1c4cfc5b5b57
Nieves, J.W.
0814b902-2195-4236-817b-bb85b921269a
Netelenbos, J.C.
8ad4fa11-e5a6-47ee-b738-660ccd9d9a70
Pfeilschifter, J.
39a39944-567b-47d5-8973-630dcd32b2cc
Rossini, M.
4d5d0ab4-a01e-4060-9b7d-13723ed0ebdf
Roux, C.
fc926270-4149-405d-8cce-44d9305cc45d
Saag, K.G.
9046e2b0-8654-4058-9703-aaa49a12fd78
Silverman, S.
dfe0f214-17ef-41de-b403-7e2b3105f178
Watts, N.B.
5dac1dfe-2fee-4fb4-942d-e28c0c29fdf5
Greenspan, S.L.
69b09b9d-bff3-428b-b0cd-e746e1095159
March, L.
0cf98556-b3c8-42dd-8c50-e468d144013f
Gregson, C.L.
9e28df51-89ec-4a1e-88ff-c6010a986e96
Cooper, C.
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Dennison, E.M.
ee647287-edb4-4392-8361-e59fd505b1d1

Litwic, A.E., Compston, J.E., Wyman, A., Siris, E.S., Gehlbach, S.H., Adachi, J.D, Chapurlat, R., Diez-Perez, A., LaCroix, A.Z., Nieves, J.W., Netelenbos, J.C., Pfeilschifter, J., Watts, N.B., Greenspan, S.L., March, L., Gregson, C.L., Cooper, C. and Dennison, E.M. , Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW) Investigators (2017) Self-perception of fracture risk: what can it tell us? Osteoporosis International, 28 (12), 3495-3500. (doi:10.1007/s00198-017-4200-3).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Summary:

In this study, we report that self-perception of fracture risk captures some aspect of fracture risk not currently measured using conventional fracture prediction tools and is associated with improved medication uptake. It suggests that adequate appreciation of fracture risk may be beneficial and lead to greater healthcare engagement and treatment.

Introduction:

This study aimed to assess how well self-perception of fracture risk, and fracture risk as estimated by the fracture prediction tool FRAX, related to fracture incidence and uptake and persistence of anti-osteoporosis medication among women participating in the Global Longitudinal study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW).

Methods:

GLOW is an international cohort study involving 723 physician practices across 10 countries in Europe, North America and Australia. Aged ≥ 55 years, 60,393 women completed baseline questionnaires detailing medical history, including co-morbidities, fractures and self-perceived fracture risk (SPR). Annual follow-up included self-reported incident fractures and anti-osteoporosis medication (AOM) use. We calculated FRAX risk without bone mineral density measurement.

Results:

Of the 39,241 women with at least 1 year of follow-up data, 2132 (5.4%) sustained an incident major osteoporotic fracture over 5 years of follow-up. Within each SPR category, risk of fracture increased as the FRAX categorisation of risk increased. In GLOW, only 11% of women with a lower baseline SPR were taking AOM at baseline, compared with 46% of women with a higher SPR. AOM use tended to increase in the years after a reported fracture. However, women with a lower SPR who were fractured still reported lower AOM rates than women with or without a fracture but had a higher SPR.

Conclusions:

These results suggest that SPR captures some aspect of fracture risk not currently measured using conventional fracture prediction tools and is also associated with improved medication uptake.

Text
Revised GLOW SPR paper final no tables - Accepted Manuscript
Download (92kB)
Text
GLOW SPR Table 1 July 2017
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
GLOW SPR OI 2017 Figure1
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 16 August 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 31 August 2017
Published date: December 2017

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 413982
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/413982
ISSN: 0937-941X
PURE UUID: 14265f46-037f-4598-8a14-00219e47a63b
ORCID for C. Cooper: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-0709
ORCID for E.M. Dennison: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3048-4961

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Sep 2017 16:31
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 05:10

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: A.E. Litwic
Author: J.E. Compston
Author: A. Wyman
Author: E.S. Siris
Author: S.H. Gehlbach
Author: J.D Adachi
Author: R. Chapurlat
Author: A. Diez-Perez
Author: A.Z. LaCroix
Author: J.W. Nieves
Author: J.C. Netelenbos
Author: J. Pfeilschifter
Author: M. Rossini
Author: C. Roux
Author: K.G. Saag
Author: S. Silverman
Author: N.B. Watts
Author: S.L. Greenspan
Author: L. March
Author: C.L. Gregson
Author: C. Cooper ORCID iD
Author: E.M. Dennison ORCID iD
Corporate Author: Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW) Investigators

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×