The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Predicting childhood overweight and obesity using maternal and early life risk factors: a systematic review

Predicting childhood overweight and obesity using maternal and early life risk factors: a systematic review
Predicting childhood overweight and obesity using maternal and early life risk factors: a systematic review
Background: Childhood obesity is a serious public health challenge and identification of high-risk populations for early intervention to prevent its development is a priority. We aimed to systematically review prediction models for childhood overweight/obesity and critically assess the methodology of their development, validation and reporting.

Methods: Medline and Embase were searched from their start dates to 31/12/16 for studies published in English describing the development and/or validation of a model that could predict the development of overweight and/or obesity between 1 to 13 years using maternal and early life factors using:

{Pediatric Obesity/ OR Fetal Macrosomia/ OR

[(child or childhood or children or p#ediatric* or infant* or toddler or embry* or prenatal* or neonat*).mp. AND (obes*.mp. OR overnutrition/ or obesity/ or overweight/ OR overweight.mp. OR over weight.mp.)]} AND [exp causality/ OR ((Reinforc* or Enabl* or predispos*) and factor*).mp. OR (risk* or predict* or causal* or prognos* or causation).mp.] AND

[exp Maternal Behavior/ OR maternal.mp. OR mother*.mp. OR early life.mp.]
Data were extracted using the Cochrane CHARMS checklist. The TRIPOD statement was used to assess transparency in reporting.

Findings: Ten studies were identified that developed (one), developed and validated (seven) or externally validated an existing (two) prediction model. A median of 23 (interquartile range, 22 to 24) TRIPOD items out of 37 (31 for derivation/validation alone) were reported. Except one, all models were developed using automated variable selection methods. Four studies only included complete cases and two studies used multiple imputation to handle missing data.

Maternal body mass index, birthweight and gender were the most commonly included predictors. Median AUROC was 0.78 in development/internal validation and 0.71 in external validation.

Conclusion: It was not possible to combine the results due to considerable model heterogeneity. Some included models have not been externally validated or compared to existing models to assess performance.

New methods are needed to combine findings from existing prediction models. Future prediction models need to be developed, validated and recalibrated to target populations using standard robust methods to refine the applicability of the resulting scores.
0140-6736
S100
Ziauddeen, Nida
3ad67dd8-26ba-498a-af0a-b1174298995b
Roderick, Paul
dbb3cd11-4c51-4844-982b-0eb30ad5085a
Macklon, Nicholas
7db1f4fc-a9f6-431f-a1f2-297bb8c9fb7e
Alwan, Nisreen
0d37b320-f325-4ed3-ba51-0fe2866d5382
Ziauddeen, Nida
3ad67dd8-26ba-498a-af0a-b1174298995b
Roderick, Paul
dbb3cd11-4c51-4844-982b-0eb30ad5085a
Macklon, Nicholas
7db1f4fc-a9f6-431f-a1f2-297bb8c9fb7e
Alwan, Nisreen
0d37b320-f325-4ed3-ba51-0fe2866d5382

Ziauddeen, Nida, Roderick, Paul, Macklon, Nicholas and Alwan, Nisreen (2017) Predicting childhood overweight and obesity using maternal and early life risk factors: a systematic review. The Lancet, 390 (Supplement 3), S100. (doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33035-0).

Record type: Meeting abstract

Abstract

Background: Childhood obesity is a serious public health challenge and identification of high-risk populations for early intervention to prevent its development is a priority. We aimed to systematically review prediction models for childhood overweight/obesity and critically assess the methodology of their development, validation and reporting.

Methods: Medline and Embase were searched from their start dates to 31/12/16 for studies published in English describing the development and/or validation of a model that could predict the development of overweight and/or obesity between 1 to 13 years using maternal and early life factors using:

{Pediatric Obesity/ OR Fetal Macrosomia/ OR

[(child or childhood or children or p#ediatric* or infant* or toddler or embry* or prenatal* or neonat*).mp. AND (obes*.mp. OR overnutrition/ or obesity/ or overweight/ OR overweight.mp. OR over weight.mp.)]} AND [exp causality/ OR ((Reinforc* or Enabl* or predispos*) and factor*).mp. OR (risk* or predict* or causal* or prognos* or causation).mp.] AND

[exp Maternal Behavior/ OR maternal.mp. OR mother*.mp. OR early life.mp.]
Data were extracted using the Cochrane CHARMS checklist. The TRIPOD statement was used to assess transparency in reporting.

Findings: Ten studies were identified that developed (one), developed and validated (seven) or externally validated an existing (two) prediction model. A median of 23 (interquartile range, 22 to 24) TRIPOD items out of 37 (31 for derivation/validation alone) were reported. Except one, all models were developed using automated variable selection methods. Four studies only included complete cases and two studies used multiple imputation to handle missing data.

Maternal body mass index, birthweight and gender were the most commonly included predictors. Median AUROC was 0.78 in development/internal validation and 0.71 in external validation.

Conclusion: It was not possible to combine the results due to considerable model heterogeneity. Some included models have not been externally validated or compared to existing models to assess performance.

New methods are needed to combine findings from existing prediction models. Future prediction models need to be developed, validated and recalibrated to target populations using standard robust methods to refine the applicability of the resulting scores.

Text
2017_June_Lancet_conference_abstract_prediction_Nida_V2 clean - Accepted Manuscript
Download (17kB)
Text
2017_Lancet_obesity prediction review
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (52kB)
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 12 September 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 27 November 2017
Published date: November 2017

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 414036
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/414036
ISSN: 0140-6736
PURE UUID: 2f2b70db-5b61-478a-92f1-46bb29c0ae5e
ORCID for Paul Roderick: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9475-6850
ORCID for Nisreen Alwan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4134-8463

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Sep 2017 16:31
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 05:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nida Ziauddeen
Author: Paul Roderick ORCID iD
Author: Nicholas Macklon
Author: Nisreen Alwan ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×