The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

MEO dynamics and GNSS disposal strategies

MEO dynamics and GNSS disposal strategies
MEO dynamics and GNSS disposal strategies
In the last years significant understandings in the
knowledge of the dynamics of the MEO satellites were
achieved. Much work was done in the analysis of viable
disposal strategies and technologies for the spacecraft
belonging to the Global Navigation Satellite Systems
(GNSS), with particular emphasis on the European
Galileo system. In the framework of an ESA-ESOC
Contract an extensive numerical simulations of different
long term evolution scenarios, implementing different
disposal strategies were performed. A detailed analysis
of the collision risk and manoeuvres need, related to the
different scenarios, was performed. In terms of the long
term evolution, the scenarios where the orbital
instabilities are exploited to remove the objects from the
operational regions seems favourite. That is, if the focus
is on the long term sustainability of the space
environment, the possibility to dilute the collision risk
and to aim at the re-entry in the atmosphere of a subset of
the disposed GNSS spacecraft is the most attractive. The
most "problematic" constellations are Glonass and
Beidou. This conclusion is driven by the future launch
traffic hypothesized for these constellations and by the
past practices that left already a significant number of
large uncontrolled spacecraft in the constellation orbital
zone, in the case of Glonass. On the other hand, the
Galileo constellation is well detached from the others and
faces the lowest collision risks. The Stable scenarios
seems to minimize the interactions (crossings) with the
operational constellations and, therefore, might be
preferred for operational reasons. In particular, in the
Stable scenarios the inter-constellations interaction is
negligible. Particular care should be devoted to the
efficiency and reliability of the disposal manoeuvers. A
significant share of the collision risk faced by the
operational satellites in every simulated scenario can be
traced back to the "failed'' satellites (the success rate of
the disposal manoeuvers was assumed to be 90 % for all
the constellations).
European Space Agency
Rossi, Alessandro
dbb6a038-0004-4136-920f-608d6419e91a
Alessi, Elisa M.
363a6cf6-21db-412d-ae15-318dfebb38ab
Valsecchi, Giovanni B.
38c024c9-7bd3-4808-bd94-b3c83f33c611
Lewis, Hugh G.
e9048cd8-c188-49cb-8e2a-45f6b316336a
Colombo, Camilla
51cd9647-6e0b-4d90-85fb-5d4ff2b09dc0
Anselmo, Luciano
0abd6b3f-c1f7-4768-873b-1fd7147148e5
Pardini, Carmen
c6b424ae-9ba8-4cb9-9024-052a46851043
Deleflie, Florent
0818a829-c5fe-4bff-aab8-58ac5c5ed1ef
Merz, Klaus
0c481bd6-72f0-4d40-9887-38a20ca66b90
Flohrer, T.
Schmitz, F.
Rossi, Alessandro
dbb6a038-0004-4136-920f-608d6419e91a
Alessi, Elisa M.
363a6cf6-21db-412d-ae15-318dfebb38ab
Valsecchi, Giovanni B.
38c024c9-7bd3-4808-bd94-b3c83f33c611
Lewis, Hugh G.
e9048cd8-c188-49cb-8e2a-45f6b316336a
Colombo, Camilla
51cd9647-6e0b-4d90-85fb-5d4ff2b09dc0
Anselmo, Luciano
0abd6b3f-c1f7-4768-873b-1fd7147148e5
Pardini, Carmen
c6b424ae-9ba8-4cb9-9024-052a46851043
Deleflie, Florent
0818a829-c5fe-4bff-aab8-58ac5c5ed1ef
Merz, Klaus
0c481bd6-72f0-4d40-9887-38a20ca66b90
Flohrer, T.
Schmitz, F.

Rossi, Alessandro, Alessi, Elisa M., Valsecchi, Giovanni B., Lewis, Hugh G., Colombo, Camilla, Anselmo, Luciano, Pardini, Carmen, Deleflie, Florent and Merz, Klaus (2017) MEO dynamics and GNSS disposal strategies. Flohrer, T. and Schmitz, F. (eds.) In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Space Debris. vol. 7, European Space Agency..

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

In the last years significant understandings in the
knowledge of the dynamics of the MEO satellites were
achieved. Much work was done in the analysis of viable
disposal strategies and technologies for the spacecraft
belonging to the Global Navigation Satellite Systems
(GNSS), with particular emphasis on the European
Galileo system. In the framework of an ESA-ESOC
Contract an extensive numerical simulations of different
long term evolution scenarios, implementing different
disposal strategies were performed. A detailed analysis
of the collision risk and manoeuvres need, related to the
different scenarios, was performed. In terms of the long
term evolution, the scenarios where the orbital
instabilities are exploited to remove the objects from the
operational regions seems favourite. That is, if the focus
is on the long term sustainability of the space
environment, the possibility to dilute the collision risk
and to aim at the re-entry in the atmosphere of a subset of
the disposed GNSS spacecraft is the most attractive. The
most "problematic" constellations are Glonass and
Beidou. This conclusion is driven by the future launch
traffic hypothesized for these constellations and by the
past practices that left already a significant number of
large uncontrolled spacecraft in the constellation orbital
zone, in the case of Glonass. On the other hand, the
Galileo constellation is well detached from the others and
faces the lowest collision risks. The Stable scenarios
seems to minimize the interactions (crossings) with the
operational constellations and, therefore, might be
preferred for operational reasons. In particular, in the
Stable scenarios the inter-constellations interaction is
negligible. Particular care should be devoted to the
efficiency and reliability of the disposal manoeuvers. A
significant share of the collision risk faced by the
operational satellites in every simulated scenario can be
traced back to the "failed'' satellites (the success rate of
the disposal manoeuvers was assumed to be 90 % for all
the constellations).

Text
paper_MEO_esoc2017 - Accepted Manuscript
Download (4MB)

More information

Published date: 2017

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 414303
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/414303
PURE UUID: c91cdaf1-271b-4850-b8c2-c90ee173adb7
ORCID for Hugh G. Lewis: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3946-8757

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Sep 2017 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:55

Export record

Contributors

Author: Alessandro Rossi
Author: Elisa M. Alessi
Author: Giovanni B. Valsecchi
Author: Hugh G. Lewis ORCID iD
Author: Camilla Colombo
Author: Luciano Anselmo
Author: Carmen Pardini
Author: Florent Deleflie
Author: Klaus Merz
Editor: T. Flohrer
Editor: F. Schmitz

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×