The Monkey Selfie and the concept of authorship: an EU perspective
The Monkey Selfie and the concept of authorship: an EU perspective
The question whether a macaque named Naruto could be regarded as the author of protectable works (self-portrait photographs, ie selfies) has captured popular attention, and been the subject of litigation in the US. Further to the 2016 decision of the US District Court for the Northern District of California that rejected that a monkey could have standing and the subsequent appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the case was settled out of court in 2017.
This short contribution discusses whether, generally speaking, copyright can vest in works by non-human authors. It does so from the perspective of international and EU laws, addressing issues such as originality, as well as the concept of ‘authorship’ in relevant legislative texts.
It concludes that, while there remain ambiguities regarding who can qualify as an author, arguments can be advanced against consideration of works by non-human authors as protectable by copyright. However, the article also highlights how this issue is likely to resurface with reinvigorated force (and relevance) in light of technological advancement, notably in the context of artificial intelligence.
Rosati, Eleonora
bd04e7f8-e14b-4e43-975e-77bc5abaa8a4
Rosati, Eleonora
bd04e7f8-e14b-4e43-975e-77bc5abaa8a4
Rosati, Eleonora
(2017)
The Monkey Selfie and the concept of authorship: an EU perspective.
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice.
(doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpx199).
Abstract
The question whether a macaque named Naruto could be regarded as the author of protectable works (self-portrait photographs, ie selfies) has captured popular attention, and been the subject of litigation in the US. Further to the 2016 decision of the US District Court for the Northern District of California that rejected that a monkey could have standing and the subsequent appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the case was settled out of court in 2017.
This short contribution discusses whether, generally speaking, copyright can vest in works by non-human authors. It does so from the perspective of international and EU laws, addressing issues such as originality, as well as the concept of ‘authorship’ in relevant legislative texts.
It concludes that, while there remain ambiguities regarding who can qualify as an author, arguments can be advanced against consideration of works by non-human authors as protectable by copyright. However, the article also highlights how this issue is likely to resurface with reinvigorated force (and relevance) in light of technological advancement, notably in the context of artificial intelligence.
Text
Monkey Selfie
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 2 October 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 6 December 2017
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 414801
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/414801
ISSN: 1747-1532
PURE UUID: 2fb1d085-bf8a-441b-a27a-f5131e59254a
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Oct 2017 16:31
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 05:48
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Eleonora Rosati
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics