The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Survey of neonatal nurses' practices and beliefs in relation to skin health

Survey of neonatal nurses' practices and beliefs in relation to skin health
Survey of neonatal nurses' practices and beliefs in relation to skin health
Despite the reported high prevalence of skin damage in neonatal units, little is known regarding assessment and management of neonatal skin.

A questionnaire was designed addressing beliefs and practices of participants. This was distributed to neonatal nurses across southern England.

In total 56 responses were returned (7% response rate). Incidence of damage was perceived to be high, with 26% of participants reporting that this occurred daily. Skin damage was frequently associated with medical devices, including nasal continuous positive airway pressure, medical tape, and peripheral cannulas. Staff education emerged as a key theme in promoting skin health. However, only 10% of participants had received skin care training. Participants highlighted concerns about the lack of previous research in this area.

The results confirm the vulnerability of neonatal skin to medical devices, with participants citing these as the primary cause of damage. Additionally, skin care is constrained by lack of training and resources.
RCUK, EPSRC, EPSRC-NIHR, EP/M000303/1, EP/N02723X/1
86-93
Liversedge, Hannah L.
6351e6bd-48da-49f8-9fd2-9b5552d0974d
Bader, Dan L.
9884d4f6-2607-4d48-bf0c-62bdcc0d1dbf
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
Worsley, Peter R.
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756
Liversedge, Hannah L.
6351e6bd-48da-49f8-9fd2-9b5552d0974d
Bader, Dan L.
9884d4f6-2607-4d48-bf0c-62bdcc0d1dbf
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
Worsley, Peter R.
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756

Liversedge, Hannah L., Bader, Dan L., Schoonhoven, Lisette and Worsley, Peter R. (2018) Survey of neonatal nurses' practices and beliefs in relation to skin health. Journal of Neonatal Nursing, 24 (2), 86-93. (doi:10.1016/j.jnn.2017.07.007).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Despite the reported high prevalence of skin damage in neonatal units, little is known regarding assessment and management of neonatal skin.

A questionnaire was designed addressing beliefs and practices of participants. This was distributed to neonatal nurses across southern England.

In total 56 responses were returned (7% response rate). Incidence of damage was perceived to be high, with 26% of participants reporting that this occurred daily. Skin damage was frequently associated with medical devices, including nasal continuous positive airway pressure, medical tape, and peripheral cannulas. Staff education emerged as a key theme in promoting skin health. However, only 10% of participants had received skin care training. Participants highlighted concerns about the lack of previous research in this area.

The results confirm the vulnerability of neonatal skin to medical devices, with participants citing these as the primary cause of damage. Additionally, skin care is constrained by lack of training and resources.

Text
Survey of neonatal nurses' practices and beliefs in relation to skin health - Accepted Manuscript
Download (77kB)
Text
Survey of neonatal nurses' practices and beliefs in relation to skin health - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 29 July 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 7 September 2017
Published date: 1 April 2018
Keywords: RCUK, EPSRC, EPSRC-NIHR, EP/M000303/1, EP/N02723X/1

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 415986
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/415986
PURE UUID: 67b8191f-089c-4d34-86fb-1c7fa5770111
ORCID for Hannah L. Liversedge: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4885-4983
ORCID for Dan L. Bader: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1208-3507
ORCID for Lisette Schoonhoven: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7129-3766
ORCID for Peter R. Worsley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0145-5042

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Nov 2017 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 05:57

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×