The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The effectiveness of online pain resources for health professionals: a systematic review with subset meta-analysis of educational intervention studies

The effectiveness of online pain resources for health professionals: a systematic review with subset meta-analysis of educational intervention studies
The effectiveness of online pain resources for health professionals: a systematic review with subset meta-analysis of educational intervention studies
Online educational interventions are increasingly developed for health professionals and students, although graduate and undergraduate medical curricular often contain limited information about how to assess and manage pain. This study reviews the literature on the effectiveness of pain-related online educational resources. Studies were identified via a search of Medline, PsychINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and OpenGrey databases. Search terms included three concept blocks: (i) type of intervention - online education, computer-based, e-learning, web-based, and internet-based; (ii) population – pediatrician, physician, nurse, psychologist, medical; (iii) outcome - pain*. Thirty-two studies (13 randomised controlled trials, 5 non-randomised controlled trials, 14 single-group pre-post studies) were included. Ten provided data for inclusion in a series of between-groups meta-analyses. Post-intervention, participants receiving online instruction had significantly greater knowledge compared to those receiving training as usual/alternative training (Hedges’ g = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.12, 1.49), and students had significantly greater skills compared to students receiving training as usual (g = 1.34, CI: 0.38, 2.30). No significant differences were found for confidence/competence (g = 0.02, CI: -0.79. 0.84) or attitudes/beliefs (g = 0.16, CI: -0.48, 0.79). Although online educational resources show promise in improving learner knowledge, considerable heterogeneity exists between studies in quality, design, educational content, and outcomes. Further methodologically robust RCTs are required to establish the effectiveness of online educational interventions and a greater understanding of the key features of successful online resources, including cognitive interactivity. Few studies assessed health outcomes for patients, remaining a major priority for future investigations.
0304-3959
631-643
Liossi, Christina
fd401ad6-581a-4a31-a60b-f8671ffd3558
Failo, Alessandro
570abaf8-a8d1-43c6-8e64-87161d05c5ce
Schoth, Daniel
73f3036e-b8cb-40b2-9466-e8e0f341fdd5
Williams, Glyn
696412a7-ed5a-44d3-93db-21484b514860
Howard, Richard
b017d5f8-d5ad-4227-9f38-ad138866b831
Liossi, Christina
fd401ad6-581a-4a31-a60b-f8671ffd3558
Failo, Alessandro
570abaf8-a8d1-43c6-8e64-87161d05c5ce
Schoth, Daniel
73f3036e-b8cb-40b2-9466-e8e0f341fdd5
Williams, Glyn
696412a7-ed5a-44d3-93db-21484b514860
Howard, Richard
b017d5f8-d5ad-4227-9f38-ad138866b831

Liossi, Christina, Failo, Alessandro, Schoth, Daniel, Williams, Glyn and Howard, Richard (2018) The effectiveness of online pain resources for health professionals: a systematic review with subset meta-analysis of educational intervention studies. Pain, 159 (4), 631-643. (doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001146).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Online educational interventions are increasingly developed for health professionals and students, although graduate and undergraduate medical curricular often contain limited information about how to assess and manage pain. This study reviews the literature on the effectiveness of pain-related online educational resources. Studies were identified via a search of Medline, PsychINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and OpenGrey databases. Search terms included three concept blocks: (i) type of intervention - online education, computer-based, e-learning, web-based, and internet-based; (ii) population – pediatrician, physician, nurse, psychologist, medical; (iii) outcome - pain*. Thirty-two studies (13 randomised controlled trials, 5 non-randomised controlled trials, 14 single-group pre-post studies) were included. Ten provided data for inclusion in a series of between-groups meta-analyses. Post-intervention, participants receiving online instruction had significantly greater knowledge compared to those receiving training as usual/alternative training (Hedges’ g = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.12, 1.49), and students had significantly greater skills compared to students receiving training as usual (g = 1.34, CI: 0.38, 2.30). No significant differences were found for confidence/competence (g = 0.02, CI: -0.79. 0.84) or attitudes/beliefs (g = 0.16, CI: -0.48, 0.79). Although online educational resources show promise in improving learner knowledge, considerable heterogeneity exists between studies in quality, design, educational content, and outcomes. Further methodologically robust RCTs are required to establish the effectiveness of online educational interventions and a greater understanding of the key features of successful online resources, including cognitive interactivity. Few studies assessed health outcomes for patients, remaining a major priority for future investigations.

Text
00780 manuscript - Accepted Manuscript
Download (250kB)
Text
The_effectiveness_of_online_pain_resources_for.4
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 22 December 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 9 January 2018
Published date: April 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 416744
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/416744
ISSN: 0304-3959
PURE UUID: 10a3b312-0c85-40ed-805a-43237267f7c1
ORCID for Christina Liossi: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0627-6377

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Jan 2018 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 06:05

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Alessandro Failo
Author: Daniel Schoth
Author: Glyn Williams
Author: Richard Howard

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×