The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Screening in the community to reduce fractures in older women (SCOOP): a randomised controlled trial

Screening in the community to reduce fractures in older women (SCOOP): a randomised controlled trial
Screening in the community to reduce fractures in older women (SCOOP): a randomised controlled trial
Summary
Background
Despite effective assessment methods and medications targeting osteoporosis and related fractures, screening for fracture risk is not currently advocated in the UK. We tested whether a community-based screening intervention could reduce fractures in older women.

Methods
We did a two-arm randomised controlled trial in women aged 70–85 years to compare a screening programme using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) with usual management. Women were recruited from 100 general practitioner (GP) practices in seven regions of the UK: Birmingham, Bristol, Manchester, Norwich, Sheffield, Southampton, and York. We excluded women who were currently on prescription anti-osteoporotic drugs and any individuals deemed to be unsuitable to enter a research study (eg, known dementia, terminally ill, or recently bereaved). The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals who had one or more osteoporosis-related fractures over a 5-year period. In the screening group, treatment was recommended in women identified to be at high risk of hip fracture, according to the FRAX 10-year hip fracture probability. Prespecified secondary outcomes were the proportions of participants who had at least one hip fracture, any clinical fracture, or mortality; and the effect of screening on anxiety and health-related quality of life. This trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial registry, number ISRCTN 55814835.

Findings
12 483 eligible women were identified and participated in the trial, and 6233 women randomly assigned to the screening group between April 15, 2008, and July 2, 2009. Treatment was recommended in 898 (14%) of 6233 women. Use of osteoporosis medication was higher at the end of year 1 in the screening group compared with controls (15% vs 4%), with uptake particularly high (78% at 6 months) in the screening high-risk subgroup. Screening did not reduce the primary outcome of incidence of all osteoporosis-related fractures (hazard ratio [HR] 0·94, 95% CI 0·85–1·03, p=0·178), nor the overall incidence of all clinical fractures (0·94, 0·86–1·03, p=0·183), but screening reduced the incidence of hip fractures (0·72, 0·59–0·89, p=0·002). There was no evidence of differences in mortality, anxiety levels, or quality of life.

Interpretation
Systematic, community-based screening programme of fracture risk in older women in the UK is feasible, and could be effective in reducing hip fractures.
0140-6736
741-747
Shepstone, L.
6ede9fae-ee4e-4825-8729-0e98cb86b711
Lenaghan, E.
9e35151b-e2a2-458b-9256-bb75a0a17cc7
Cooper, C.
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Clarke, S.
633a6b7d-0fa4-46ed-9ca5-5954b69e7cda
Fong-Soe-Khioe, R.
9d6f88d4-407f-41e9-81d5-17b3355cc25d
Fordham, R.
948599ae-13f7-4e69-a8ee-a59c367c6e76
Gittoes, N.
fcf8e08c-9c98-422c-9b50-5d19090598a5
Harvey, I.
a8dffa7c-7412-4861-a03d-11e41d8632d7
Harvey, N.
ce487fb4-d360-4aac-9d17-9466d6cba145
Heawood, A.
cf79bfe7-76a9-4804-ae7b-141bd44f3a7a
Holland, R.
e64c15c4-91dd-4dcc-a97c-719fb280bbb9
Howe, A.
c166c6c8-2850-419b-9f97-75d17bf0886a
Kanis, J.A.
14988b3e-d76f-44fd-ab3b-7739bd4de6db
Marshall, T.
724ec6bf-cb74-4b6b-af08-15ac11568ad5
O'Neill, T.W.
b40358f0-5719-41f9-9855-0814aa9af4b5
Peters, T.
9aca9392-f159-4016-bf12-19a7b4b50c47
Redmond, N.
ae76f37c-4fab-45d7-bb57-c37aa3d3d586
Torgerson, D.
60ef71a7-dac0-42bd-b6a8-bf3ae1b2e9f5
Turner, D.
dbe8594a-d211-4efe-abec-46a6e0451623
McCloskey, E.
6d3df4aa-b438-4a83-bd06-06b6cbe3980f
SCOOP Study Team
Shepstone, L.
6ede9fae-ee4e-4825-8729-0e98cb86b711
Lenaghan, E.
9e35151b-e2a2-458b-9256-bb75a0a17cc7
Cooper, C.
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Clarke, S.
633a6b7d-0fa4-46ed-9ca5-5954b69e7cda
Fong-Soe-Khioe, R.
9d6f88d4-407f-41e9-81d5-17b3355cc25d
Fordham, R.
948599ae-13f7-4e69-a8ee-a59c367c6e76
Gittoes, N.
fcf8e08c-9c98-422c-9b50-5d19090598a5
Harvey, I.
a8dffa7c-7412-4861-a03d-11e41d8632d7
Harvey, N.
ce487fb4-d360-4aac-9d17-9466d6cba145
Heawood, A.
cf79bfe7-76a9-4804-ae7b-141bd44f3a7a
Holland, R.
e64c15c4-91dd-4dcc-a97c-719fb280bbb9
Howe, A.
c166c6c8-2850-419b-9f97-75d17bf0886a
Kanis, J.A.
14988b3e-d76f-44fd-ab3b-7739bd4de6db
Marshall, T.
724ec6bf-cb74-4b6b-af08-15ac11568ad5
O'Neill, T.W.
b40358f0-5719-41f9-9855-0814aa9af4b5
Peters, T.
9aca9392-f159-4016-bf12-19a7b4b50c47
Redmond, N.
ae76f37c-4fab-45d7-bb57-c37aa3d3d586
Torgerson, D.
60ef71a7-dac0-42bd-b6a8-bf3ae1b2e9f5
Turner, D.
dbe8594a-d211-4efe-abec-46a6e0451623
McCloskey, E.
6d3df4aa-b438-4a83-bd06-06b6cbe3980f

Shepstone, L., Lenaghan, E., Cooper, C., Clarke, S., Fong-Soe-Khioe, R., Fordham, R., Gittoes, N., Harvey, I., Harvey, N., Heawood, A., Holland, R., Howe, A., Kanis, J.A., Marshall, T., O'Neill, T.W., Peters, T., Redmond, N., Torgerson, D., Turner, D. and McCloskey, E. , SCOOP Study Team (2018) Screening in the community to reduce fractures in older women (SCOOP): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 391 (10122), 741-747. (doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32640-5).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Summary
Background
Despite effective assessment methods and medications targeting osteoporosis and related fractures, screening for fracture risk is not currently advocated in the UK. We tested whether a community-based screening intervention could reduce fractures in older women.

Methods
We did a two-arm randomised controlled trial in women aged 70–85 years to compare a screening programme using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) with usual management. Women were recruited from 100 general practitioner (GP) practices in seven regions of the UK: Birmingham, Bristol, Manchester, Norwich, Sheffield, Southampton, and York. We excluded women who were currently on prescription anti-osteoporotic drugs and any individuals deemed to be unsuitable to enter a research study (eg, known dementia, terminally ill, or recently bereaved). The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals who had one or more osteoporosis-related fractures over a 5-year period. In the screening group, treatment was recommended in women identified to be at high risk of hip fracture, according to the FRAX 10-year hip fracture probability. Prespecified secondary outcomes were the proportions of participants who had at least one hip fracture, any clinical fracture, or mortality; and the effect of screening on anxiety and health-related quality of life. This trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial registry, number ISRCTN 55814835.

Findings
12 483 eligible women were identified and participated in the trial, and 6233 women randomly assigned to the screening group between April 15, 2008, and July 2, 2009. Treatment was recommended in 898 (14%) of 6233 women. Use of osteoporosis medication was higher at the end of year 1 in the screening group compared with controls (15% vs 4%), with uptake particularly high (78% at 6 months) in the screening high-risk subgroup. Screening did not reduce the primary outcome of incidence of all osteoporosis-related fractures (hazard ratio [HR] 0·94, 95% CI 0·85–1·03, p=0·178), nor the overall incidence of all clinical fractures (0·94, 0·86–1·03, p=0·183), but screening reduced the incidence of hip fractures (0·72, 0·59–0·89, p=0·002). There was no evidence of differences in mortality, anxiety levels, or quality of life.

Interpretation
Systematic, community-based screening programme of fracture risk in older women in the UK is feasible, and could be effective in reducing hip fractures.

Text
THELANCET-S-17-00761 REVISION 2 PAPER No Mark Up - Accepted Manuscript
Download (116kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 1 December 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 15 December 2017
Published date: 24 February 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 417015
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/417015
ISSN: 0140-6736
PURE UUID: 6166a4c6-d77f-43da-82f2-04de12c23ba2
ORCID for C. Cooper: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-0709
ORCID for N. Harvey: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8194-2512

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Jan 2018 17:30
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 05:11

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: L. Shepstone
Author: E. Lenaghan
Author: C. Cooper ORCID iD
Author: S. Clarke
Author: R. Fong-Soe-Khioe
Author: R. Fordham
Author: N. Gittoes
Author: I. Harvey
Author: N. Harvey ORCID iD
Author: A. Heawood
Author: R. Holland
Author: A. Howe
Author: J.A. Kanis
Author: T. Marshall
Author: T.W. O'Neill
Author: T. Peters
Author: N. Redmond
Author: D. Torgerson
Author: D. Turner
Author: E. McCloskey
Corporate Author: SCOOP Study Team

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×