Democratic innovations and the challenge of parliamentary oversight in a small state: is small really beautiful?
Democratic innovations and the challenge of parliamentary oversight in a small state: is small really beautiful?
It is commonly asserted that, when it comes to democratic politics, ‘small is beautiful’. This assumption harks back to antiquity and is employed by advocates of participatory and deliberative democracy to justify innovations that ‘scale-down’ decision-making in large states. Despite their obvious relevance, this literature fails to account for the democratic experience of the world's smallest states. In this article, I bring small states in to this discussion by examining recent democratic innovations in Tuvalu. Rather than ‘scaling-down’, in this instance Tuvalu is attempting to ‘scale-up’ its democratic institutions due to the challenges posed by its small size. The lesson for advocates of decentralisation in large states and the orthodox view that ‘small is beautiful’ is a cautionary one: size matters but not necessarily in the manner democratic theory predicts or in ways that fulfil normative desires.
Corbett, Jack
ad651655-ac70-4072-a36f-92165e296ce2
Corbett, Jack
ad651655-ac70-4072-a36f-92165e296ce2
Corbett, Jack
(2018)
Democratic innovations and the challenge of parliamentary oversight in a small state: is small really beautiful?
Small States and Territories Journal.
(In Press)
Abstract
It is commonly asserted that, when it comes to democratic politics, ‘small is beautiful’. This assumption harks back to antiquity and is employed by advocates of participatory and deliberative democracy to justify innovations that ‘scale-down’ decision-making in large states. Despite their obvious relevance, this literature fails to account for the democratic experience of the world's smallest states. In this article, I bring small states in to this discussion by examining recent democratic innovations in Tuvalu. Rather than ‘scaling-down’, in this instance Tuvalu is attempting to ‘scale-up’ its democratic institutions due to the challenges posed by its small size. The lesson for advocates of decentralisation in large states and the orthodox view that ‘small is beautiful’ is a cautionary one: size matters but not necessarily in the manner democratic theory predicts or in ways that fulfil normative desires.
Text
SST_MS4_Tuvalu_Corbett_3_18Jan2018
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 20 January 2018
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 417306
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/417306
PURE UUID: d464e13a-25dc-490b-afb6-49c4c37d2ac6
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 29 Jan 2018 17:30
Last modified: 12 Dec 2021 08:04
Export record
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
