If It doesn't work, why do we still do it? The continuing use of subtalar joint neutral theory in the face of overpowering critical research

Abstract

The use of subtalar joint neutral (STJN) in the assessment and treatment of foot-related musculoskeletal symptomology is common in daily practice and still widely taught. The main pioneer of this theory was Dr Merton L. Root, and it has been labeled with a variety of names: “the foot morphology theory,” “the subtalar joint neutral theory,” or simply “Rootian theory” or “Root model.” The theory's core concepts still underpin a common approach to musculoskeletal assessment of the foot, as well as the consequent design of foot orthoses. The available literature continues to point to Dr Root's theory as the most prevalently utilized. Concurrently, the worth of this theory has been challenged due to its poor reliability and limited external validity. This Viewpoint reviews the main clinical areas of the STJN theory, and concludes with a possible explanation and concerns for its ongoing use. To support our view, we will discuss (1) historical inaccuracies, (2) challenges with reliability, and (3) concerns with validity.

More information

Identifiers

ORCID for Lucy Gates: orcid.org/0000-0002-8627-3418

ORCID for Catherine Bowen: orcid.org/0000-0002-7252-9515

Catalogue record

Export record

Altmetrics