Functions and health at the interface of biology and technology
Functions and health at the interface of biology and technology
Synthetic biology promises to eliminate the distinction between biology and engineering by delivering a philosophically interesting new kind of entity: a biological organism that is wholly designed and constructed by humans. The possibility of such organisms raises interesting questions in three domains: the analysis of (1) biological functions, (2) engineering functions, and (3) health and disease. This paper identifies and systematically answers these questions. This does not only establish how we should think about functions and health and disease in synthetic biological organisms, but it also reveals insights that are of broader relevance: (1) aetiological accounts of biological function need to omit or reinterpret reference to natural selection. This results in complete continuity between aetiological analyses of function in engineering and philosophy; (2) considering synthetic biology prompts interesting further questions about heritability, ancestry, and biological individuals; and (3) accounts of disease as biological dysfunction do not straightforwardly map onto our intuitive health and disease judgments regarding non-human animals. In response to the latter point I examine three possible avenues, and tentatively defend one on behalf of the ‘disease as dysfunction’ theorist.
Function, Disease, HEALTH, synthetic biology
182-203
Kingma, Elselijn
24f1e065-3004-452c-868d-9aee3087bf63
March 2020
Kingma, Elselijn
24f1e065-3004-452c-868d-9aee3087bf63
Kingma, Elselijn
(2020)
Functions and health at the interface of biology and technology.
Noûs, 54 (1), .
(doi:10.1111/nous.12259).
Abstract
Synthetic biology promises to eliminate the distinction between biology and engineering by delivering a philosophically interesting new kind of entity: a biological organism that is wholly designed and constructed by humans. The possibility of such organisms raises interesting questions in three domains: the analysis of (1) biological functions, (2) engineering functions, and (3) health and disease. This paper identifies and systematically answers these questions. This does not only establish how we should think about functions and health and disease in synthetic biological organisms, but it also reveals insights that are of broader relevance: (1) aetiological accounts of biological function need to omit or reinterpret reference to natural selection. This results in complete continuity between aetiological analyses of function in engineering and philosophy; (2) considering synthetic biology prompts interesting further questions about heritability, ancestry, and biological individuals; and (3) accounts of disease as biological dysfunction do not straightforwardly map onto our intuitive health and disease judgments regarding non-human animals. In response to the latter point I examine three possible avenues, and tentatively defend one on behalf of the ‘disease as dysfunction’ theorist.
Text
Kingma - NOUS - Functions Health Synthetic Biology
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 26 March 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 16 September 2018
Published date: March 2020
Keywords:
Function, Disease, HEALTH, synthetic biology
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 419260
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/419260
ISSN: 1468-0068
PURE UUID: c12b9055-361a-45ed-ab0d-537edaa39288
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Apr 2018 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 06:24
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics