Phased array transformation methods to estimate non-compact jet noise source characteristics
Phased array transformation methods to estimate non-compact jet noise source characteristics
This paper reviews the basis of the beam former (BF) and polar correlation (PC) phased array methods and shows that these provide different information about axially distributed, non-compact noise sources, which nevertheless satisfy a simple integral relationship. The conventional BF method provides an image of the source PSD, whereas the PC method yields a ‘source strength’ which is an image of the axial wavenumber transform of the source CSD. However, the BF method can be generalised to provide an image of the source CSD. At first sight the generalised BF method is therefore more useful for diagnostic purposes but the results presented here suggest that the combined effects of resolution and source convection place serious limitations on the source CSD image information. For the same reasons, although the source PSD axial shape can be obtained with the conventional BF method, it cannot yield its absolute level for this type of source. The PC method yields a source strength axial distribution at each ‘reference’ microphone, which when integrated over the source length, yields the far-field PSD at that reference microphone. Therefore the PC source strength is arguably the more relevant quantity to measure when determining what proportion of the sound at a particular microphone position comes from each region of the jet axis, as a function of radiation angle.
1-19
Tester, Brian
1bd4a793-131b-4173-93cc-3eca70b2d116
Glegg, Stewart
b4781c99-8588-4ee1-a555-8063e800d9e5
Tester, Brian
1bd4a793-131b-4173-93cc-3eca70b2d116
Glegg, Stewart
b4781c99-8588-4ee1-a555-8063e800d9e5
Tester, Brian and Glegg, Stewart
(2018)
Phased array transformation methods to estimate non-compact jet noise source characteristics.
International Journal of Aeroacoustics, .
(doi:10.1177/1475472X18778267).
Abstract
This paper reviews the basis of the beam former (BF) and polar correlation (PC) phased array methods and shows that these provide different information about axially distributed, non-compact noise sources, which nevertheless satisfy a simple integral relationship. The conventional BF method provides an image of the source PSD, whereas the PC method yields a ‘source strength’ which is an image of the axial wavenumber transform of the source CSD. However, the BF method can be generalised to provide an image of the source CSD. At first sight the generalised BF method is therefore more useful for diagnostic purposes but the results presented here suggest that the combined effects of resolution and source convection place serious limitations on the source CSD image information. For the same reasons, although the source PSD axial shape can be obtained with the conventional BF method, it cannot yield its absolute level for this type of source. The PC method yields a source strength axial distribution at each ‘reference’ microphone, which when integrated over the source length, yields the far-field PSD at that reference microphone. Therefore the PC source strength is arguably the more relevant quantity to measure when determining what proportion of the sound at a particular microphone position comes from each region of the jet axis, as a function of radiation angle.
Text
Jnl_Aeroacoustics_Tester_Glegg_No title page_with_Ack
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
Jnl_Aeroacoustics_v1b_Title page
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
Tester & Glegg IJA 2018 1-19 DOI_ 10.1177_1475472X18778267
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 27 March 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 27 May 2018
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 420252
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/420252
ISSN: 1475-472X
PURE UUID: a362766a-09c2-4e3d-a93a-6623b7fd3b94
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 May 2018 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 06:34
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Brian Tester
Author:
Stewart Glegg
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics