The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Sortition, rotation and mandate: conditions for political equality and deliberative reasoning

Sortition, rotation and mandate: conditions for political equality and deliberative reasoning
Sortition, rotation and mandate: conditions for political equality and deliberative reasoning
The proposal to create a chamber selected by sortition would extend this democratic procedure into the legislative branch of government. However, there are good reasons to believe that, as currently conceived by John Gastil and Erik Olin Wright, the proposal will fail to realize sufficiently two fundamental democratic goods, namely political equality and deliberative reasoning. Through analysis of its historic and contemporary application, we argue that sortition needs to be combined with other institutional devices, in particular rotation of membership and limited mandate, in order to be democratically effective and to realize political equality and deliberative reasoning. We conclude with an alternative proposal for a responsive sortition legislature that we believe to be more realistic and utopian: one that increases substantially the number of members, makes more extensive use of internal sortition and rotation and recognizes the importance of establishing limited mandates.
Sortion, rotation, mandate
1555-7359
419-434
Owen, David
9fc71bca-07d1-44af-9248-1b9545265a58
Smith, Graham
b1fb36d4-a322-4631-92f9-0421ce0b6f90
Owen, David
9fc71bca-07d1-44af-9248-1b9545265a58
Smith, Graham
b1fb36d4-a322-4631-92f9-0421ce0b6f90

Owen, David and Smith, Graham (2018) Sortition, rotation and mandate: conditions for political equality and deliberative reasoning. Politics and Society, 46 (3), 419-434. (doi:10.1177/0032329218789892).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The proposal to create a chamber selected by sortition would extend this democratic procedure into the legislative branch of government. However, there are good reasons to believe that, as currently conceived by John Gastil and Erik Olin Wright, the proposal will fail to realize sufficiently two fundamental democratic goods, namely political equality and deliberative reasoning. Through analysis of its historic and contemporary application, we argue that sortition needs to be combined with other institutional devices, in particular rotation of membership and limited mandate, in order to be democratically effective and to realize political equality and deliberative reasoning. We conclude with an alternative proposal for a responsive sortition legislature that we believe to be more realistic and utopian: one that increases substantially the number of members, makes more extensive use of internal sortition and rotation and recognizes the importance of establishing limited mandates.

Text
Owen and Smith Circumstances of sortition revised final - Accepted Manuscript
Download (54kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 10 May 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 13 August 2018
Published date: 1 September 2018
Keywords: Sortion, rotation, mandate

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 421015
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/421015
ISSN: 1555-7359
PURE UUID: 05de7cbc-ac88-476e-8369-409109f34563
ORCID for David Owen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8865-6332

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 May 2018 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:50

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: David Owen ORCID iD
Author: Graham Smith

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×