Comparison of methods for improving fracture risk assessment in Diabetes: The Manitoba BMD Registry
Comparison of methods for improving fracture risk assessment in Diabetes: The Manitoba BMD Registry
Type 2 diabetes is a risk factor for fracture independent of FRAX (fracture risk assessment) probability. We directly compared four proposed methods to improve the performance of FRAX for type 2 diabetes by: (1) including the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) input to FRAX; (2) making a trabecular bone score (TBS) adjustment to FRAX; (3) reducing the femoral neck T‐score input to FRAX by 0.5 SD; and (4) increasing the age input to FRAX by 10 years. We examined major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) and hip fractures (HFs) over a mean of 8.3 years observation among 44,543 women and men 40 years of age or older (4136 with diabetes) with baseline lumbar spine and hip DXA from 1999 through 2016. Controlled for unadjusted FRAX probability, diabetes was associated with an increased risk for MOFs and HFs. All four FRAX adjustments attenuated the effect of diabetes, but a residual effect of diabetes was seen on MOF risk after TBS adjustment, and on HF risk after the RA and TBS adjustments. Among those with diabetes, unadjusted FRAX risk underestimated MOF (observed/predicted ratio 1.15; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.28), but this was no longer significant after applying the diabetes adjustments. HF risk was more severely underestimated (observed/predicted ratio 1.85; 95% CI, 1.51 to 2.20) and was only partially corrected with the diabetes adjustments (still significant for the RA and TBS adjustments). Among those with diabetes, there was moderate reclassification based upon a fixed MOF cut‐off of 20% (4.1% to 7.1%) or fixed HF cut‐off of 3% (5.7% to 16.5%). Net reclassification improvement increased for MOF with each of the diabetes adjustments (range 3.9% to 5.6% in the diabetes subgroup). In conclusion, each of the proposed methods for addressing limitations in the ability of FRAX to assess fracture risk in individuals with diabetes was found to improve performance, though no single method was optimal in all settings.
1923-1930
Leslie, William D.
5b2dd5d6-4569-40a3-a9b1-95152d11e4f1
Johansson, Helena
04f12338-4dd1-437b-b9bc-e0884130c215
McCloskey, Eugene V.
2f057a16-3d4e-4597-80c7-6ce47f969c78
Harvey, Nicholas
ce487fb4-d360-4aac-9d17-9466d6cba145
Kanis, John A.
55c6bd2c-d653-48de-b4b9-29fe280fb00f
Hans, Didier
1a5d8024-c245-4e99-afc6-b9b82d04cb22
November 2018
Leslie, William D.
5b2dd5d6-4569-40a3-a9b1-95152d11e4f1
Johansson, Helena
04f12338-4dd1-437b-b9bc-e0884130c215
McCloskey, Eugene V.
2f057a16-3d4e-4597-80c7-6ce47f969c78
Harvey, Nicholas
ce487fb4-d360-4aac-9d17-9466d6cba145
Kanis, John A.
55c6bd2c-d653-48de-b4b9-29fe280fb00f
Hans, Didier
1a5d8024-c245-4e99-afc6-b9b82d04cb22
Leslie, William D., Johansson, Helena, McCloskey, Eugene V., Harvey, Nicholas, Kanis, John A. and Hans, Didier
(2018)
Comparison of methods for improving fracture risk assessment in Diabetes: The Manitoba BMD Registry.
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 33 (11), .
(doi:10.1002/jbmr.3538).
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes is a risk factor for fracture independent of FRAX (fracture risk assessment) probability. We directly compared four proposed methods to improve the performance of FRAX for type 2 diabetes by: (1) including the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) input to FRAX; (2) making a trabecular bone score (TBS) adjustment to FRAX; (3) reducing the femoral neck T‐score input to FRAX by 0.5 SD; and (4) increasing the age input to FRAX by 10 years. We examined major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) and hip fractures (HFs) over a mean of 8.3 years observation among 44,543 women and men 40 years of age or older (4136 with diabetes) with baseline lumbar spine and hip DXA from 1999 through 2016. Controlled for unadjusted FRAX probability, diabetes was associated with an increased risk for MOFs and HFs. All four FRAX adjustments attenuated the effect of diabetes, but a residual effect of diabetes was seen on MOF risk after TBS adjustment, and on HF risk after the RA and TBS adjustments. Among those with diabetes, unadjusted FRAX risk underestimated MOF (observed/predicted ratio 1.15; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.28), but this was no longer significant after applying the diabetes adjustments. HF risk was more severely underestimated (observed/predicted ratio 1.85; 95% CI, 1.51 to 2.20) and was only partially corrected with the diabetes adjustments (still significant for the RA and TBS adjustments). Among those with diabetes, there was moderate reclassification based upon a fixed MOF cut‐off of 20% (4.1% to 7.1%) or fixed HF cut‐off of 3% (5.7% to 16.5%). Net reclassification improvement increased for MOF with each of the diabetes adjustments (range 3.9% to 5.6% in the diabetes subgroup). In conclusion, each of the proposed methods for addressing limitations in the ability of FRAX to assess fracture risk in individuals with diabetes was found to improve performance, though no single method was optimal in all settings.
Text
Comparison of Methods for Improving Fracture Risk Assessment in Diabetes-JBMR 2018-04-03-accepted
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
Comparison of Methods for Improving Fracture Risk Assessment in Diabetes-JBMR 2018-04-14-JBMR-supplemental R2
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 22 June 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 June 2018
Published date: November 2018
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 422304
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/422304
ISSN: 0884-0431
PURE UUID: cdb9441d-82b9-4abb-98f8-86aa1d08240f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Jul 2018 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 06:50
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
William D. Leslie
Author:
Helena Johansson
Author:
Eugene V. McCloskey
Author:
John A. Kanis
Author:
Didier Hans
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics