The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Discrepancy in current central serous chorioretinopathy classification

Discrepancy in current central serous chorioretinopathy classification
Discrepancy in current central serous chorioretinopathy classification

Aim: To report the discordance in central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) classification among practising retina specialists. 

Methods: The study conducted was a multicentre survey. Multimodal retinal images along with relevant clinical details of 100 cases diagnosed as CSCR (from six centres) were circulated among six retina specialists across the globe. The image sets included colour fundus photographs, fundus autofluorescence images, optical coherence tomography b-scans, fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography of the study and fellow eyes. The graders were asked to classify the disease of study eye, according to their own criteria. The graders were masked to the responses of other graders. The final analysis of the pooled response data was done based on the diagnosis of study eye only. The main outcome measure was degree of agreement between six independent observers using Fleiss Kappa statistics. 

Results: Grading for 100 eyes of 100 patients (men, 93%) was included in the analysis. 20 patients had a history of steroid use. The graders provided 36 different terms to classify the disease, with poor agreement among graders (Fleiss Kappa=0.134). The consistency in diagnosing acute CSCR was statistically higher than for either chronic (p=0.012) or recurrent CSCR (p<0.0001). When collapsing descriptors into six main terms, agreement remained poor (Fleiss Kappa=0.218). 

Conclusion: The high discordance among experienced retina specialists in describing CSCR clinical subtypes is highlighted. The current work demonstrates the limitations of current empirical CSCR classification methods and the need for a more objective and refined system to bring uniformity in diagnosis and prognostication of the disease.

central serous chorioretinopathy, fluorescein angiography, fundus autofluorescence, indocyanine green angiography., optical coherence tomography
0007-1161
Singh, Sumit Randhir
d52ae6c7-e853-4aeb-8258-99914c998527
Matet, Alexandre
f230ff1f-4b9e-41fc-81e3-fef63c4d8274
Van Dijk, Elon H.C.
329df4dd-691a-4218-ba65-dcb884bb597a
Daruich, Alejandra
7ef41248-0889-4d88-854c-757ef1b5001d
Fauser, Sascha
9828d1fc-966e-40e7-a726-ec9913eeabdf
Yzer, Suzanne
1ad64e41-6a6b-464e-ab31-f686ec8b26f0
Peiretti, Enrico
85a25752-e676-4255-9fe2-12d8b7f5abea
Sivaprasad, Sobha
7cd590d6-18f0-4ae1-8ace-4b35833c2f03
Lotery, Andrew J.
5ecc2d2d-d0b4-468f-ad2c-df7156f8e514
Boon, Camiel J.F.
0656f60f-744b-4548-908c-2b9e0aac098f
Behar-Cohen, Francine
538bbb9e-3afa-46b9-8ace-6d506613153c
Freund, K. Bailey
190b4f3b-211b-42ab-8f73-ff65a769c16f
Chhablani, Jay
9abc8ae5-d397-41fd-939f-4b586ad65621
Singh, Sumit Randhir
d52ae6c7-e853-4aeb-8258-99914c998527
Matet, Alexandre
f230ff1f-4b9e-41fc-81e3-fef63c4d8274
Van Dijk, Elon H.C.
329df4dd-691a-4218-ba65-dcb884bb597a
Daruich, Alejandra
7ef41248-0889-4d88-854c-757ef1b5001d
Fauser, Sascha
9828d1fc-966e-40e7-a726-ec9913eeabdf
Yzer, Suzanne
1ad64e41-6a6b-464e-ab31-f686ec8b26f0
Peiretti, Enrico
85a25752-e676-4255-9fe2-12d8b7f5abea
Sivaprasad, Sobha
7cd590d6-18f0-4ae1-8ace-4b35833c2f03
Lotery, Andrew J.
5ecc2d2d-d0b4-468f-ad2c-df7156f8e514
Boon, Camiel J.F.
0656f60f-744b-4548-908c-2b9e0aac098f
Behar-Cohen, Francine
538bbb9e-3afa-46b9-8ace-6d506613153c
Freund, K. Bailey
190b4f3b-211b-42ab-8f73-ff65a769c16f
Chhablani, Jay
9abc8ae5-d397-41fd-939f-4b586ad65621

Singh, Sumit Randhir, Matet, Alexandre, Van Dijk, Elon H.C., Daruich, Alejandra, Fauser, Sascha, Yzer, Suzanne, Peiretti, Enrico, Sivaprasad, Sobha, Lotery, Andrew J., Boon, Camiel J.F., Behar-Cohen, Francine, Freund, K. Bailey and Chhablani, Jay (2018) Discrepancy in current central serous chorioretinopathy classification. British Journal of Ophthalmology. (doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312435).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Aim: To report the discordance in central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) classification among practising retina specialists. 

Methods: The study conducted was a multicentre survey. Multimodal retinal images along with relevant clinical details of 100 cases diagnosed as CSCR (from six centres) were circulated among six retina specialists across the globe. The image sets included colour fundus photographs, fundus autofluorescence images, optical coherence tomography b-scans, fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography of the study and fellow eyes. The graders were asked to classify the disease of study eye, according to their own criteria. The graders were masked to the responses of other graders. The final analysis of the pooled response data was done based on the diagnosis of study eye only. The main outcome measure was degree of agreement between six independent observers using Fleiss Kappa statistics. 

Results: Grading for 100 eyes of 100 patients (men, 93%) was included in the analysis. 20 patients had a history of steroid use. The graders provided 36 different terms to classify the disease, with poor agreement among graders (Fleiss Kappa=0.134). The consistency in diagnosing acute CSCR was statistically higher than for either chronic (p=0.012) or recurrent CSCR (p<0.0001). When collapsing descriptors into six main terms, agreement remained poor (Fleiss Kappa=0.218). 

Conclusion: The high discordance among experienced retina specialists in describing CSCR clinical subtypes is highlighted. The current work demonstrates the limitations of current empirical CSCR classification methods and the need for a more objective and refined system to bring uniformity in diagnosis and prognostication of the disease.

Text
Revised 1.6.18 Discrepancy in current central serous chorioretinopathy 14032018 - Accepted Manuscript
Download (64kB)
Image
Figure 1 tiff
Download (2MB)
Image
Figure 2 tiff
Download (831kB)
Image
Figure 3 tiff
Download (713kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 15 June 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 12 July 2018
Keywords: central serous chorioretinopathy, fluorescein angiography, fundus autofluorescence, indocyanine green angiography., optical coherence tomography

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 423065
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/423065
ISSN: 0007-1161
PURE UUID: 1ac4a128-f174-43db-b256-5427f3ccda18
ORCID for Andrew J. Lotery: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5541-4305

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Aug 2018 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:32

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sumit Randhir Singh
Author: Alexandre Matet
Author: Elon H.C. Van Dijk
Author: Alejandra Daruich
Author: Sascha Fauser
Author: Suzanne Yzer
Author: Enrico Peiretti
Author: Sobha Sivaprasad
Author: Camiel J.F. Boon
Author: Francine Behar-Cohen
Author: K. Bailey Freund
Author: Jay Chhablani

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×