The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Modelling group heterogeneity for small area estimation using M-quantiles

Modelling group heterogeneity for small area estimation using M-quantiles
Modelling group heterogeneity for small area estimation using M-quantiles

Small area estimation typically requires model-based methods that depend on isolating the contribution to overall population heterogeneity associated with group (i.e. small area) membership. One way of doing this is via random effects models with latent group effects. Alternatively, one can use an M-quantile ensemble model that assigns indices to sampled individuals characterising their contribution to overall sample heterogeneity. These indices are then aggregated to form group effects. The aim of this article is to contrast these two approaches to characterising group effects and to illustrate them in the context of small area estimation. In doing so, we consider a range of different data types, including continuous data, count data and binary response data.

M-quantile regression, random effects model, small area estimation
0306-7734
S50-S63
Dawber, James
85c7c036-2ae3-4c57-a8b3-9f5223cd4da6
Chambers, Raymond
68685a02-e1d0-4143-b5d4-0e91ff0e3d02
Dawber, James
85c7c036-2ae3-4c57-a8b3-9f5223cd4da6
Chambers, Raymond
68685a02-e1d0-4143-b5d4-0e91ff0e3d02

Dawber, James and Chambers, Raymond (2019) Modelling group heterogeneity for small area estimation using M-quantiles. International Statistical Review, 87 (S1), S50-S63. (doi:10.1111/insr.12284).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Small area estimation typically requires model-based methods that depend on isolating the contribution to overall population heterogeneity associated with group (i.e. small area) membership. One way of doing this is via random effects models with latent group effects. Alternatively, one can use an M-quantile ensemble model that assigns indices to sampled individuals characterising their contribution to overall sample heterogeneity. These indices are then aggregated to form group effects. The aim of this article is to contrast these two approaches to characterising group effects and to illustrate them in the context of small area estimation. In doing so, we consider a range of different data types, including continuous data, count data and binary response data.

Text
MQreview_ISR FINAL_eps_plots_REVISED2 - Accepted Manuscript
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 31 July 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 16 September 2018
Published date: May 2019
Keywords: M-quantile regression, random effects model, small area estimation

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 425052
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/425052
ISSN: 0306-7734
PURE UUID: d5b8a0d8-54ac-441c-a748-0bda07f0cceb

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Oct 2018 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 07:08

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: James Dawber
Author: Raymond Chambers

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×