Power of paradox: Grassroots organizations’ legitimacy strategies over time
Power of paradox: Grassroots organizations’ legitimacy strategies over time
Fringe stakeholders with limited resources, such as grassroots organizations (GROs), are often ignored in business and society literature. We develop a conceptual framework and a set of propositions detailing how GROs strategically gain legitimacy and influence over time. We argue that GROs encounter specific paradoxes over the emergence, development, and resolution of an issue, and they address these paradoxes using cognitive, moral, and pragmatic legitimacy strategies. While cognitive and moral strategies tend to be used consistently, the flexible and paradoxical use of pragmatic strategies has important consequences, both for GROs’ legitimacy and for their potential influence over powerful organizations associated with them. We enrich our framework with the help of two illustrative cases and discuss the implications of the framework for GROs’ legitimacy strategies in business and society literature.
Chowdhury, Rashedur
d9c0a66a-90d6-46e3-8855-945863126c30
Kourula, Arno
5b479a4a-4317-4fc1-9a75-ba145121e4a4
Siltaoja, Marjo
6800ed3b-944b-4008-8f52-a860750e11b5
Chowdhury, Rashedur
d9c0a66a-90d6-46e3-8855-945863126c30
Kourula, Arno
5b479a4a-4317-4fc1-9a75-ba145121e4a4
Siltaoja, Marjo
6800ed3b-944b-4008-8f52-a860750e11b5
Chowdhury, Rashedur, Kourula, Arno and Siltaoja, Marjo
(2018)
Power of paradox: Grassroots organizations’ legitimacy strategies over time.
Business & Society.
(doi:10.1177/0007650318816954).
Abstract
Fringe stakeholders with limited resources, such as grassroots organizations (GROs), are often ignored in business and society literature. We develop a conceptual framework and a set of propositions detailing how GROs strategically gain legitimacy and influence over time. We argue that GROs encounter specific paradoxes over the emergence, development, and resolution of an issue, and they address these paradoxes using cognitive, moral, and pragmatic legitimacy strategies. While cognitive and moral strategies tend to be used consistently, the flexible and paradoxical use of pragmatic strategies has important consequences, both for GROs’ legitimacy and for their potential influence over powerful organizations associated with them. We enrich our framework with the help of two illustrative cases and discuss the implications of the framework for GROs’ legitimacy strategies in business and society literature.
Text
Power of Paradox - Grassroots Organizations Legitimacy Strategies over Time (to include at Pure)
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 15 October 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 17 December 2018
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 426677
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/426677
ISSN: 0007-6503
PURE UUID: cacb7056-c742-44f5-b7f7-6e7604bb151e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Dec 2018 17:31
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 23:11
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Rashedur Chowdhury
Author:
Arno Kourula
Author:
Marjo Siltaoja
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics