All the ACEs: A chaotic concept for family policy and decision-making?
All the ACEs: A chaotic concept for family policy and decision-making?
This paper will consider ACEs as a chaotic concept that prioritises risk and obscures the material and social conditions of the lives of its objects. It will show how the various definitions of ACEs offer no cohesive body of definitive evidence and measurement, and lead to a great deal of over-claiming. It discusses how ACEs have found their time and place, locating a variety of social ills within the child's home, family and parenting behaviours. It argues that because ACEs are confined to intra-familial circumstances, and largely to narrow parent-child relations, issues outside of parental control are not addressed. It concludes that ACEs form a poor body of evidence for family policy and decision-making about child protection and that different and less stigmatising solutions are hiding in plain sight.
457-466
White, Susan
c4a2b406-0898-4941-ac07-6a438f91d2e9
Edwards, Rosalind
e43912c0-f149-4457-81a9-9c4e00a4bb42
Gillies, Val
ca51ea17-1bdf-457a-b51d-ab0c39aaa26e
Wastell, David
d853ad54-bf7c-469e-bdfb-df4b701a8296
White, Susan
c4a2b406-0898-4941-ac07-6a438f91d2e9
Edwards, Rosalind
e43912c0-f149-4457-81a9-9c4e00a4bb42
Gillies, Val
ca51ea17-1bdf-457a-b51d-ab0c39aaa26e
Wastell, David
d853ad54-bf7c-469e-bdfb-df4b701a8296
White, Susan, Edwards, Rosalind, Gillies, Val and Wastell, David
(2019)
All the ACEs: A chaotic concept for family policy and decision-making?
Social Policy and Society, 18 (3), .
(doi:10.1017/S147474641900006X).
Abstract
This paper will consider ACEs as a chaotic concept that prioritises risk and obscures the material and social conditions of the lives of its objects. It will show how the various definitions of ACEs offer no cohesive body of definitive evidence and measurement, and lead to a great deal of over-claiming. It discusses how ACEs have found their time and place, locating a variety of social ills within the child's home, family and parenting behaviours. It argues that because ACEs are confined to intra-familial circumstances, and largely to narrow parent-child relations, issues outside of parental control are not addressed. It concludes that ACEs form a poor body of evidence for family policy and decision-making about child protection and that different and less stigmatising solutions are hiding in plain sight.
Text
5. White Edwards Gillies & Wastell
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 10 January 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 23 April 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 428003
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/428003
ISSN: 1474-7464
PURE UUID: bd350e51-0c10-4522-8727-8c80599bcbcd
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Feb 2019 17:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 07:32
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Susan White
Author:
Val Gillies
Author:
David Wastell
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics