Agricultural shocks and drivers of livelihood precariousness across Indian rural communities
Agricultural shocks and drivers of livelihood precariousness across Indian rural communities
Spatial factors, such as environmental conditions, distance to natural resources and access to services can influence the impacts of climate change on rural household livelihood activities. But neither the determinants of precarious livelihoods nor their spatial context has been well understood. This paper investigates the drivers of livelihood precariousness using a place-based approach. We identify five community types in rural regions of the Mahanadi Delta, India; exurban, agro-industrial, rainfed agriculture, irrigated agriculture and resource periphery by clustering three types of community capitals (natural, social and physical). Based on this typology, we characterise the associations between precarious livelihood activities (unemployment or engagement in agricultural labour) with agricultural shocks and household capitals. Results demonstrate that, the type of community influences the impact of agricultural shocks on livelihoods as four of the five community types had increased likelihoods of precarious livelihoods being pursued when agricultural shocks increased. Our research demonstrates that the bundle of locally available community capitals influences households' coping strategies and livelihood opportunities. For example, higher levels of physical capital were associated with a lower likelihood of precarious livelihoods in agro-industrial communities but had no significant impact in the other four. Results also indicate that agricultural shocks drive livelihood precariousness (odds ratios between 1.03 and 1.07) for all but the best-connected communities, while access to household capitals tends to reduce it. Our results suggest that poverty alleviation programmes should include community typologies in their approach to provide place-specific interventions that would strengthen context-specific household capitals, thus reducing livelihood precariousness.
307-319
Berchoux, Tristan
73e8221a-e1e0-45e1-aefd-e604f0b05498
Watmough, Gary R.
35e3ef1c-950a-4f43-95a1-035ee97ed778
Hutton, Craig
9102617b-caf7-4538-9414-c29e72f5fe2e
Atkinson, Peter M.
29ab8d8a-31cb-4a19-b0fb-f0558a1f110a
September 2019
Berchoux, Tristan
73e8221a-e1e0-45e1-aefd-e604f0b05498
Watmough, Gary R.
35e3ef1c-950a-4f43-95a1-035ee97ed778
Hutton, Craig
9102617b-caf7-4538-9414-c29e72f5fe2e
Atkinson, Peter M.
29ab8d8a-31cb-4a19-b0fb-f0558a1f110a
Berchoux, Tristan, Watmough, Gary R., Hutton, Craig and Atkinson, Peter M.
(2019)
Agricultural shocks and drivers of livelihood precariousness across Indian rural communities.
Landscape and Urban Planning, 189, .
(doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.014).
Abstract
Spatial factors, such as environmental conditions, distance to natural resources and access to services can influence the impacts of climate change on rural household livelihood activities. But neither the determinants of precarious livelihoods nor their spatial context has been well understood. This paper investigates the drivers of livelihood precariousness using a place-based approach. We identify five community types in rural regions of the Mahanadi Delta, India; exurban, agro-industrial, rainfed agriculture, irrigated agriculture and resource periphery by clustering three types of community capitals (natural, social and physical). Based on this typology, we characterise the associations between precarious livelihood activities (unemployment or engagement in agricultural labour) with agricultural shocks and household capitals. Results demonstrate that, the type of community influences the impact of agricultural shocks on livelihoods as four of the five community types had increased likelihoods of precarious livelihoods being pursued when agricultural shocks increased. Our research demonstrates that the bundle of locally available community capitals influences households' coping strategies and livelihood opportunities. For example, higher levels of physical capital were associated with a lower likelihood of precarious livelihoods in agro-industrial communities but had no significant impact in the other four. Results also indicate that agricultural shocks drive livelihood precariousness (odds ratios between 1.03 and 1.07) for all but the best-connected communities, while access to household capitals tends to reduce it. Our results suggest that poverty alleviation programmes should include community typologies in their approach to provide place-specific interventions that would strengthen context-specific household capitals, thus reducing livelihood precariousness.
Text
LAND2019_3556_AcceptedManuscript
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
1-s2.0-S0169204618305255-main
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 15 April 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 18 May 2019
Published date: September 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 430414
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/430414
ISSN: 0169-2046
PURE UUID: 5ffbae77-de75-4379-a537-70e0cf00990e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Apr 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 07:47
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Tristan Berchoux
Author:
Gary R. Watmough
Author:
Peter M. Atkinson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics