The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

How consistent and effective are current repositioning strategies for pressure ulcer prevention?

How consistent and effective are current repositioning strategies for pressure ulcer prevention?
How consistent and effective are current repositioning strategies for pressure ulcer prevention?
Aim
To examine the inter-practitioner variability of repositioning for pressure ulcer prevention, the effectiveness of the intervention, and whether the provision of written guidance influenced the repositioning technique.

Methods
A pre-test post-test study design was utilised. Descriptive data regarding the work history of participants was collected. Participants were invited to reposition a healthy volunteer before and after reviewing guidance detailing the 30° side-lying technique. The researchers measured the resulting turn angles and assessed offloading of bony prominences.

Results
The repositioning technique varied considerably in the sample of nurse participants. Turn angles decreased following the guidance, but offloading of body sites vulnerable to pressure damage remained sporadic.

Conclusion
Pressure ulcer prevention training should include practical demonstrations of repositioning. Clear guidance regarding the optimal repositioning technique for pressure ulcer prevention is needed.
0897-1897
58-62
Woodhouse, Marjolein
36f06394-e309-4667-87c6-45c476a0f3c0
Worsley, Peter
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756
Voegeli, David
e6f5d112-55b0-40c1-a6ad-8929a2d84a10
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
Bader, Daniel
9884d4f6-2607-4d48-bf0c-62bdcc0d1dbf
Woodhouse, Marjolein
36f06394-e309-4667-87c6-45c476a0f3c0
Worsley, Peter
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756
Voegeli, David
e6f5d112-55b0-40c1-a6ad-8929a2d84a10
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
Bader, Daniel
9884d4f6-2607-4d48-bf0c-62bdcc0d1dbf

Woodhouse, Marjolein, Worsley, Peter, Voegeli, David, Schoonhoven, Lisette and Bader, Daniel (2019) How consistent and effective are current repositioning strategies for pressure ulcer prevention? Applied Nursing Research, 48, 58-62. (doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2019.05.013).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Aim
To examine the inter-practitioner variability of repositioning for pressure ulcer prevention, the effectiveness of the intervention, and whether the provision of written guidance influenced the repositioning technique.

Methods
A pre-test post-test study design was utilised. Descriptive data regarding the work history of participants was collected. Participants were invited to reposition a healthy volunteer before and after reviewing guidance detailing the 30° side-lying technique. The researchers measured the resulting turn angles and assessed offloading of bony prominences.

Results
The repositioning technique varied considerably in the sample of nurse participants. Turn angles decreased following the guidance, but offloading of body sites vulnerable to pressure damage remained sporadic.

Conclusion
Pressure ulcer prevention training should include practical demonstrations of repositioning. Clear guidance regarding the optimal repositioning technique for pressure ulcer prevention is needed.

Text
How consistent and effective are current repositioning strategies for pressure ulcer prevention? - Accepted Manuscript
Download (377kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 12 May 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 25 May 2019
Published date: August 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 430967
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/430967
ISSN: 0897-1897
PURE UUID: 64ffa26a-97e1-4352-a9a4-a8fadcb95916
ORCID for Peter Worsley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0145-5042
ORCID for David Voegeli: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3457-7177
ORCID for Lisette Schoonhoven: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7129-3766
ORCID for Daniel Bader: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1208-3507

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 May 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 07:51

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Marjolein Woodhouse
Author: Peter Worsley ORCID iD
Author: David Voegeli ORCID iD
Author: Daniel Bader ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×