What about the Men? Gender inequality data and the rhetoric of inclusion in the US and UK film industries
What about the Men? Gender inequality data and the rhetoric of inclusion in the US and UK film industries
This article argues that cis, hetero, abled, middle-class, white men – as a group and as an identity category – are the structuring absence of inequality discourse and, as a consequence, it is ‘diverse’ persons who bear both the burden of and any hope for changing the film industry. By ‘re-reading’ gender inequality data, diversity initiatives and inclusion rhetoric, this article shows the ways in which they elide men’s domination of the film industry and perversely reinforce it as the norm. Articulating how data on gender representation behind the camera can both illuminate inequality and be used to obfuscate it, the article looks closely at selected reports in order to see what they do and do not tell us about gender inequality and the unequal presence of men in the industry. As the dominating demographic of the film-making workforce, the white middle-class male is also the structuring absence of the inclusion rhetoric which maintains the status quo of inequality in the film industry by interpellating ‘diverse’ persons as outsiders who must gain the attention of the white middle-class men who may or may not choose to include them.
Diversity, Film industry, british film institute, demographic statistics, gender inequality
112-135
Cobb, Shelley
5f0aaa8a-b217-4169-a5a8-168b6234c00d
1 January 2020
Cobb, Shelley
5f0aaa8a-b217-4169-a5a8-168b6234c00d
Cobb, Shelley
(2020)
What about the Men? Gender inequality data and the rhetoric of inclusion in the US and UK film industries.
Journal of British Cinema and Television, 17 (1), .
(doi:10.3366/jbctv.2020.0510).
Abstract
This article argues that cis, hetero, abled, middle-class, white men – as a group and as an identity category – are the structuring absence of inequality discourse and, as a consequence, it is ‘diverse’ persons who bear both the burden of and any hope for changing the film industry. By ‘re-reading’ gender inequality data, diversity initiatives and inclusion rhetoric, this article shows the ways in which they elide men’s domination of the film industry and perversely reinforce it as the norm. Articulating how data on gender representation behind the camera can both illuminate inequality and be used to obfuscate it, the article looks closely at selected reports in order to see what they do and do not tell us about gender inequality and the unequal presence of men in the industry. As the dominating demographic of the film-making workforce, the white middle-class male is also the structuring absence of the inclusion rhetoric which maintains the status quo of inequality in the film industry by interpellating ‘diverse’ persons as outsiders who must gain the attention of the white middle-class men who may or may not choose to include them.
Text
JBCTVdiversityCobbfinal
- Author's Original
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
JBCTVdiversityFINALCobb 11-19
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
In preparation date: 2019
Accepted/In Press date: 10 December 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 31 December 2019
Published date: 1 January 2020
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© Edinburgh University Press
Keywords:
Diversity, Film industry, british film institute, demographic statistics, gender inequality
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 432939
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/432939
ISSN: 1743-4521
PURE UUID: 2760cc82-0898-46c0-9222-0e2939457245
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 Aug 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:58
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics