The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Handheld 3D scanning as a minimally invasive measuring technique for neonatal anthropometry

Handheld 3D scanning as a minimally invasive measuring technique for neonatal anthropometry
Handheld 3D scanning as a minimally invasive measuring technique for neonatal anthropometry
Background
Measurement of length and head circumference (HC) in addition to weight is vital in assessing the nutritional status of preterm infants. Current anthropometry represents an interruption to preterm infants, and may not be possible in unstable infants. Handheld 3D scanning has the potential to perform bedside anthropometry (length and HC) in a less invasive manner. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and performance of 3D scanning as a ‘non-touch’ measuring technique for routine anthropometry.

Methods
Preterm infants born before 30 weeks gestation were recruited from a single neonatal unit. HC and length were measured both manually and by a handheld 3D scanner at recruitment and weekly until discharge. The two methods were compared using the Bland-Altman method and linear regression.

Results
Seventeen infants had manual and 3D-scan measurements (67 HC, 87 length). The mean difference (95%CI) between manual and 3D-scan measures, as a percentage of the manual value, was 2.87% (2.27–3.47%) for HC and 3.10% (2.65–3.54%) for length. Correlation between manual and 3D measures was high; HC r = 0.957 and length 0.963. Bland-Altman plots showed reasonable agreement between the two methods, and there was a high correlation between scanner and manual measurements.

Conclusions
These data show a high correlation between measurements gathered from 3D scan images and standard anthropometry. However, 3D measures are not yet precise enough for routine clinical use. Refinement of technique/technology may translate into practical monitoring the growth of preterm infants with minimal handling and without interruption to developmental care.
2405-4577
279-282
Andrews, Edward T.
dbfdffa9-9e8d-4696-9ff1-1aa03aff3a5b
Ashton, James
03369017-99b5-40ae-9a43-14c98516f37d
Pearson, Freya
1d52a3d9-8d84-481a-8274-81cbdccbc40a
Beattie, R. Mark
9a66af0b-f81c-485c-b01d-519403f0038a
Johnson, Mark J.
ce07b5dd-b12b-47df-a5df-cd3b9447c9ed
Andrews, Edward T.
dbfdffa9-9e8d-4696-9ff1-1aa03aff3a5b
Ashton, James
03369017-99b5-40ae-9a43-14c98516f37d
Pearson, Freya
1d52a3d9-8d84-481a-8274-81cbdccbc40a
Beattie, R. Mark
9a66af0b-f81c-485c-b01d-519403f0038a
Johnson, Mark J.
ce07b5dd-b12b-47df-a5df-cd3b9447c9ed

Andrews, Edward T., Ashton, James, Pearson, Freya, Beattie, R. Mark and Johnson, Mark J. (2019) Handheld 3D scanning as a minimally invasive measuring technique for neonatal anthropometry. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 33, 279-282. (doi:10.1016/j.clnesp.2019.06.012).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background
Measurement of length and head circumference (HC) in addition to weight is vital in assessing the nutritional status of preterm infants. Current anthropometry represents an interruption to preterm infants, and may not be possible in unstable infants. Handheld 3D scanning has the potential to perform bedside anthropometry (length and HC) in a less invasive manner. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and performance of 3D scanning as a ‘non-touch’ measuring technique for routine anthropometry.

Methods
Preterm infants born before 30 weeks gestation were recruited from a single neonatal unit. HC and length were measured both manually and by a handheld 3D scanner at recruitment and weekly until discharge. The two methods were compared using the Bland-Altman method and linear regression.

Results
Seventeen infants had manual and 3D-scan measurements (67 HC, 87 length). The mean difference (95%CI) between manual and 3D-scan measures, as a percentage of the manual value, was 2.87% (2.27–3.47%) for HC and 3.10% (2.65–3.54%) for length. Correlation between manual and 3D measures was high; HC r = 0.957 and length 0.963. Bland-Altman plots showed reasonable agreement between the two methods, and there was a high correlation between scanner and manual measurements.

Conclusions
These data show a high correlation between measurements gathered from 3D scan images and standard anthropometry. However, 3D measures are not yet precise enough for routine clinical use. Refinement of technique/technology may translate into practical monitoring the growth of preterm infants with minimal handling and without interruption to developmental care.

Text
JJA_19_06_19_Handheld 3D scan - Accepted Manuscript
Download (44kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 28 June 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 18 July 2019
Published date: October 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 433617
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/433617
ISSN: 2405-4577
PURE UUID: 83dbee63-7dec-404b-b481-98a3eacb34cd
ORCID for James Ashton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0348-8198
ORCID for Mark J. Johnson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1829-9912

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Aug 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 08:08

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Edward T. Andrews
Author: James Ashton ORCID iD
Author: Freya Pearson
Author: R. Mark Beattie
Author: Mark J. Johnson ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×