The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

STructured lifestyle education for people WIth SchizophrEnia (STEPWISE): mixed methods process evaluation of a group-based lifestyle education programme to support weight loss in people with schizophrenia

STructured lifestyle education for people WIth SchizophrEnia (STEPWISE): mixed methods process evaluation of a group-based lifestyle education programme to support weight loss in people with schizophrenia
STructured lifestyle education for people WIth SchizophrEnia (STEPWISE): mixed methods process evaluation of a group-based lifestyle education programme to support weight loss in people with schizophrenia
Background: STEPWISE is a theory-informed self-management education programme that was co-produced with service users, healthcare professionals and interventionists to support weight loss for people with schizophrenia. We report the process evaluation to inform understanding about the intervention and its effectiveness in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) that evaluated its efficacy.

Methods: following the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) Guidelines for developing and evaluating complex interventions, we explored implementation quality. We considered causal mechanisms, unanticipated consequences and contextual factors associated with variation in actual and intended outcomes, and integrated treatment fidelity, using the programme theory and a pipeline logic model.

We followed a modified version of Linnan and Steckler’s framework and single case design. Qualitative data from semi-structured telephone interviews with service-users (n = 24), healthcare professionals delivering the intervention (n = 20) and interventionists (n = 7) were triangulated with quantitative process and RCT outcome data and with observations by interventionists, to examine convergence within logic model components.

Results: training and course materials were available although lacked co-ordination in some trusts. Healthcare professionals gained knowledge and some contemplated changing their practice to reflect the (facilitative) ‘style’ of delivery. They were often responsible for administrative activities increasing the burden of delivery. Healthcare professionals recognised the need to address antipsychotic-induced weight gain and reported potential value from the intervention (subject to the RCT results). However, some doubted senior management commitment and sustainability post-trial.

Service-users found the intervention highly acceptable, especially being in a group of people with similar experiences. Service-users perceived weight loss and lifestyle benefits; however, session attendance varied with 23% (n = 47) attending all group-sessions and 17% (n = 36) attending none. Service-users who lost weight wanted closer monitoring and many healthcare professionals wanted to monitor outcomes (e.g. weight) but it was outside the intervention design. No clinical or cost benefit was demonstrated from the intermediate outcomes (RCT) and any changes in RCT outcomes were not due to the intervention.
Conclusions

This process evaluation provides a greater understanding of why STEPWISE was unsuccessful in promoting weight loss during the clinical trial. Further research is required to evaluate whether different levels of contact and objective monitoring can support people with schizophrenia to lose weight.
1471-244X
Holt, Richard
d54202e1-fcf6-4a17-a320-9f32d7024393
Gossage-Worrall, Rebecca
c299b140-6c96-413e-91fa-1ceed377c493
Hind, Daniel
d0246cbf-e8b6-45c2-9412-76e0988852f3
Barnard, Katharine
9f7c7a1e-9a30-4f61-9b8d-78703b9b9f44
Shiers, David
0f60817c-dbb8-447b-a90a-4f9e2216fb74
Etherington, Angela
50ebd32b-6ea1-4246-93ec-22100071d16b
Swaby, Lizzie
1cb77004-1c86-4962-888e-2bc5f4fa3bea
Holt, Richard
d54202e1-fcf6-4a17-a320-9f32d7024393
Gossage-Worrall, Rebecca
c299b140-6c96-413e-91fa-1ceed377c493
Hind, Daniel
d0246cbf-e8b6-45c2-9412-76e0988852f3
Barnard, Katharine
9f7c7a1e-9a30-4f61-9b8d-78703b9b9f44
Shiers, David
0f60817c-dbb8-447b-a90a-4f9e2216fb74
Etherington, Angela
50ebd32b-6ea1-4246-93ec-22100071d16b
Swaby, Lizzie
1cb77004-1c86-4962-888e-2bc5f4fa3bea

Holt, Richard, Gossage-Worrall, Rebecca, Hind, Daniel, Barnard, Katharine, Shiers, David, Etherington, Angela and Swaby, Lizzie (2019) STructured lifestyle education for people WIth SchizophrEnia (STEPWISE): mixed methods process evaluation of a group-based lifestyle education programme to support weight loss in people with schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry, 19, [358]. (doi:10.1186/s12888-019-2282-5).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: STEPWISE is a theory-informed self-management education programme that was co-produced with service users, healthcare professionals and interventionists to support weight loss for people with schizophrenia. We report the process evaluation to inform understanding about the intervention and its effectiveness in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) that evaluated its efficacy.

Methods: following the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) Guidelines for developing and evaluating complex interventions, we explored implementation quality. We considered causal mechanisms, unanticipated consequences and contextual factors associated with variation in actual and intended outcomes, and integrated treatment fidelity, using the programme theory and a pipeline logic model.

We followed a modified version of Linnan and Steckler’s framework and single case design. Qualitative data from semi-structured telephone interviews with service-users (n = 24), healthcare professionals delivering the intervention (n = 20) and interventionists (n = 7) were triangulated with quantitative process and RCT outcome data and with observations by interventionists, to examine convergence within logic model components.

Results: training and course materials were available although lacked co-ordination in some trusts. Healthcare professionals gained knowledge and some contemplated changing their practice to reflect the (facilitative) ‘style’ of delivery. They were often responsible for administrative activities increasing the burden of delivery. Healthcare professionals recognised the need to address antipsychotic-induced weight gain and reported potential value from the intervention (subject to the RCT results). However, some doubted senior management commitment and sustainability post-trial.

Service-users found the intervention highly acceptable, especially being in a group of people with similar experiences. Service-users perceived weight loss and lifestyle benefits; however, session attendance varied with 23% (n = 47) attending all group-sessions and 17% (n = 36) attending none. Service-users who lost weight wanted closer monitoring and many healthcare professionals wanted to monitor outcomes (e.g. weight) but it was outside the intervention design. No clinical or cost benefit was demonstrated from the intermediate outcomes (RCT) and any changes in RCT outcomes were not due to the intervention.
Conclusions

This process evaluation provides a greater understanding of why STEPWISE was unsuccessful in promoting weight loss during the clinical trial. Further research is required to evaluate whether different levels of contact and objective monitoring can support people with schizophrenia to lose weight.

Text
STEPWISE Process Evaluation Paper_Accepted - Accepted Manuscript
Download (1MB)
Text
Final STEPWISE qualitative paper - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (3MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 10 September 2019
Published date: 13 November 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 434021
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/434021
ISSN: 1471-244X
PURE UUID: b221f05a-de5a-4358-aeb6-7877abf3549a
ORCID for Richard Holt: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8911-6744

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Sep 2019 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:52

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Richard Holt ORCID iD
Author: Rebecca Gossage-Worrall
Author: Daniel Hind
Author: Katharine Barnard
Author: David Shiers
Author: Angela Etherington
Author: Lizzie Swaby

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×