The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

On valid descriptive inference from non-probability sample

On valid descriptive inference from non-probability sample
On valid descriptive inference from non-probability sample
We examine the conditions under which descriptive inference can be based directly on the observed distribution in a non-probability sample, under both the super-population and quasi- randomisation modelling approaches. Review of existing estimation methods reveals that the traditional formulation of these conditions may be inadequate due to potential issues of under- coverage or heterogeneous mean beyond the assumed model. We formulate unifying conditions that are applicable to both types of modelling approaches. The difficulties of empirically validating the required conditions are discussed, as well as valid inference approaches using supplementary probability sampling. The key message is that probability sampling may still be necessary in some situations, in order to ensure the validity of descriptive inference, but it can be much less resource-demanding given the presence of a big non-probability sample.
Non-informative selection, prediction model, calibration, inverse propensity weighting, sample matching, model misspecification
2475-4269
103-113
Zhang, Li-Chun
a5d48518-7f71-4ed9-bdcb-6585c2da3649
Zhang, Li-Chun
a5d48518-7f71-4ed9-bdcb-6585c2da3649

Zhang, Li-Chun (2019) On valid descriptive inference from non-probability sample. Statistical Theory and Related Fields, 3 (2), 103-113. (doi:10.1080/24754269.2019.1666241).

Record type: Article

Abstract

We examine the conditions under which descriptive inference can be based directly on the observed distribution in a non-probability sample, under both the super-population and quasi- randomisation modelling approaches. Review of existing estimation methods reveals that the traditional formulation of these conditions may be inadequate due to potential issues of under- coverage or heterogeneous mean beyond the assumed model. We formulate unifying conditions that are applicable to both types of modelling approaches. The difficulties of empirically validating the required conditions are discussed, as well as valid inference approaches using supplementary probability sampling. The key message is that probability sampling may still be necessary in some situations, in order to ensure the validity of descriptive inference, but it can be much less resource-demanding given the presence of a big non-probability sample.

Text
TSTF-2018-0039_R3 (002) - Accepted Manuscript
Download (345kB)
Text
On valid descriptive inference from non probability sample
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 7 September 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 13 September 2019
Published date: 2019
Keywords: Non-informative selection, prediction model, calibration, inverse propensity weighting, sample matching, model misspecification

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 434333
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/434333
ISSN: 2475-4269
PURE UUID: 65448a88-5f80-4705-9670-47b3388990d4
ORCID for Li-Chun Zhang: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3944-9484

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Sep 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 08:12

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×