The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

End-of-life care in intellectual disability: a retrospective cross-sectional study

End-of-life care in intellectual disability: a retrospective cross-sectional study
End-of-life care in intellectual disability: a retrospective cross-sectional study
Background Adults with intellectual disability (ID) experience inequality in access to healthcare that is considered to extend to end-of-life care. Their experiences of healthcare at the end of life and how these compare with the general population are unknown.

Aim To describe the end-of-life care outcomes for adults with ID living in residential care in the UK using the VOICES-SF questionnaire and compare these with the general population.

Design Nationwide population-based postbereavement survey.

Participants 38 ID care providers took part in the study. The supported over 13 000 people with ID. Over the 18-month period of data collection, 222 deaths were reported. The survey was completed, by care staff, for 157 (70.7%) of those deaths.

Results Decedents had complex health, functional and behavioural needs. Death was unanticipated in a high proportion of cases. Quality of care provided across care settings was generally well rated. However, hospital care and care provided at the time of was less well rated, particularly in comparison with the general population. Respondents reported low levels of involvement in care and awareness of approaching death among adults with ID, and lower than in the general population.

Conclusions Access to end-of-life care for adults with ID may be constrained by a failure to identify approaching the end of life. The high proportion of unexpected deaths in this population warrants further study. There is a need to increase and support the involvement of adults with ID to be active partners in planning care at the end of their lives.
2045-435X
469-477
Hunt, K.
5eab8123-1157-4d4e-a7d9-5fd817218c6e
Bernal, J.
5e48eebe-620e-4b28-9e38-b1b103161a60
Worth, R.
c765a907-35c9-4213-aeb5-57eeb9fddb76
Shearn, J.
2bdd2dec-b6dc-4f14-a933-5970845b4f5a
Jarvis, P.
08a50462-7806-4312-9a97-1856ff98b4aa
Jones, E.
d715a921-380f-4746-a100-36df9c1bae8b
Lowe, K.
4e18fc2b-ef99-4061-b8ee-47a7a8ecbcba
Madden, P.
c10cab87-ee44-4ca5-a5d1-97c15a24f592
Barr, O.
2fe0c2e8-56a9-48f1-b1c4-244ebc97c609
Forrester-Jones, R.
8c40a3a6-8e55-4717-a5ff-172cde30ed72
Kroll, T.
94a82ea7-32bd-4ff8-90cd-8cd0282b6a37
McCarron, M.O.
49985d16-f2e0-4d44-aad0-2591fcbeb4c3
Read, S.
58182ddf-046b-4bfc-a53e-3e1e85890ea5
Todd, S.
0309ad37-cddf-4397-8a6c-c0554aae0fde
Hunt, K.
5eab8123-1157-4d4e-a7d9-5fd817218c6e
Bernal, J.
5e48eebe-620e-4b28-9e38-b1b103161a60
Worth, R.
c765a907-35c9-4213-aeb5-57eeb9fddb76
Shearn, J.
2bdd2dec-b6dc-4f14-a933-5970845b4f5a
Jarvis, P.
08a50462-7806-4312-9a97-1856ff98b4aa
Jones, E.
d715a921-380f-4746-a100-36df9c1bae8b
Lowe, K.
4e18fc2b-ef99-4061-b8ee-47a7a8ecbcba
Madden, P.
c10cab87-ee44-4ca5-a5d1-97c15a24f592
Barr, O.
2fe0c2e8-56a9-48f1-b1c4-244ebc97c609
Forrester-Jones, R.
8c40a3a6-8e55-4717-a5ff-172cde30ed72
Kroll, T.
94a82ea7-32bd-4ff8-90cd-8cd0282b6a37
McCarron, M.O.
49985d16-f2e0-4d44-aad0-2591fcbeb4c3
Read, S.
58182ddf-046b-4bfc-a53e-3e1e85890ea5
Todd, S.
0309ad37-cddf-4397-8a6c-c0554aae0fde

Hunt, K., Bernal, J., Worth, R., Shearn, J., Jarvis, P., Jones, E., Lowe, K., Madden, P., Barr, O., Forrester-Jones, R., Kroll, T., McCarron, M.O., Read, S. and Todd, S. (2020) End-of-life care in intellectual disability: a retrospective cross-sectional study. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 10 (4), 469-477. (doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001985).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background Adults with intellectual disability (ID) experience inequality in access to healthcare that is considered to extend to end-of-life care. Their experiences of healthcare at the end of life and how these compare with the general population are unknown.

Aim To describe the end-of-life care outcomes for adults with ID living in residential care in the UK using the VOICES-SF questionnaire and compare these with the general population.

Design Nationwide population-based postbereavement survey.

Participants 38 ID care providers took part in the study. The supported over 13 000 people with ID. Over the 18-month period of data collection, 222 deaths were reported. The survey was completed, by care staff, for 157 (70.7%) of those deaths.

Results Decedents had complex health, functional and behavioural needs. Death was unanticipated in a high proportion of cases. Quality of care provided across care settings was generally well rated. However, hospital care and care provided at the time of was less well rated, particularly in comparison with the general population. Respondents reported low levels of involvement in care and awareness of approaching death among adults with ID, and lower than in the general population.

Conclusions Access to end-of-life care for adults with ID may be constrained by a failure to identify approaching the end of life. The high proportion of unexpected deaths in this population warrants further study. There is a need to increase and support the involvement of adults with ID to be active partners in planning care at the end of their lives.

Text
End of life care for people with intellectual disability a retrospective cross sectional UK study - Accepted Manuscript
Download (57kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 19 September 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 16 October 2019
Published date: 1 December 2020

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 435175
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/435175
ISSN: 2045-435X
PURE UUID: 3381956e-a548-442c-b476-2abe390b0baf
ORCID for K. Hunt: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6173-7319

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Oct 2019 16:30
Last modified: 28 Apr 2022 02:03

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: K. Hunt ORCID iD
Author: J. Bernal
Author: R. Worth
Author: J. Shearn
Author: P. Jarvis
Author: E. Jones
Author: K. Lowe
Author: P. Madden
Author: O. Barr
Author: R. Forrester-Jones
Author: T. Kroll
Author: M.O. McCarron
Author: S. Read
Author: S. Todd

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×