The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

“I mean what is depression?” A qualitative exploration of UK General Practitioners’ perceptions of distinctions between emotional distress and depressive disorder

“I mean what is depression?” A qualitative exploration of UK General Practitioners’ perceptions of distinctions between emotional distress and depressive disorder
“I mean what is depression?” A qualitative exploration of UK General Practitioners’ perceptions of distinctions between emotional distress and depressive disorder
Objective: detection of depression is a key part of primary mental health care. However, determining whether depressive disorder is or is not present in primary care patients is complex. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore General Practitioners’ (GPs) perceptions of distinctions between emotional distress and depressive disorder.

Design: qualitative interview study.

Setting: face-to-face and telephone interviews with GPs from the South of England.

Participants: GPs working in UK primary care practices (n = 21).

Method: interviews followed a semi-structured interview guide, were audio-recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed thematically.

Results: views were divergent when directly considering whether emotional distress could be distinguished from depressive disorder. Some GPs suggested a distinction was not possible as symptoms lay on a continuum, with severity as a proxy for disorder. Others focused on the difficulty of the distinction and were uncertain. Some GPs perceived a distinction and referred to emotional distress as more likely in the presence of a stressor with the absence of biological symptoms. It was also common for GPs to refer to endogenous and reactive depression when considering possible distinctions between distress and depressive disorder.

Conclusions: GPs’ perceptions of when emotional symptoms reflect disorder varied greatly, with a broad range of views presented. Further research is needed to develop more consistent frameworks for understanding emotional symptoms in primary care.
2044-6055
Geraghty, Adam
2c6549fe-9868-4806-b65a-21881c1930af
Santer, Miriam
3ce7e832-31eb-4d27-9876-3a1cd7f381dc
Beavis, Charlotte
e0ca2cb7-98a5-42d2-b328-9aae39f4894e
Williams, Samantha
7cec7c3e-7247-473e-8121-f26b625893e1
Kendrick, Tony
c697a72c-c698-469d-8ac2-f00df40583e5
Terluin, Berend
275934a5-3d48-42ad-9aef-a4958280b8eb
Little, Paul
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Moore, Michael
1be81dad-7120-45f0-bbed-f3b0cc0cfe99
Geraghty, Adam
2c6549fe-9868-4806-b65a-21881c1930af
Santer, Miriam
3ce7e832-31eb-4d27-9876-3a1cd7f381dc
Beavis, Charlotte
e0ca2cb7-98a5-42d2-b328-9aae39f4894e
Williams, Samantha
7cec7c3e-7247-473e-8121-f26b625893e1
Kendrick, Tony
c697a72c-c698-469d-8ac2-f00df40583e5
Terluin, Berend
275934a5-3d48-42ad-9aef-a4958280b8eb
Little, Paul
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Moore, Michael
1be81dad-7120-45f0-bbed-f3b0cc0cfe99

Geraghty, Adam, Santer, Miriam, Beavis, Charlotte, Williams, Samantha, Kendrick, Tony, Terluin, Berend, Little, Paul and Moore, Michael (2019) “I mean what is depression?” A qualitative exploration of UK General Practitioners’ perceptions of distinctions between emotional distress and depressive disorder. BMJ Open, 9 (12). (doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032644).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: detection of depression is a key part of primary mental health care. However, determining whether depressive disorder is or is not present in primary care patients is complex. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore General Practitioners’ (GPs) perceptions of distinctions between emotional distress and depressive disorder.

Design: qualitative interview study.

Setting: face-to-face and telephone interviews with GPs from the South of England.

Participants: GPs working in UK primary care practices (n = 21).

Method: interviews followed a semi-structured interview guide, were audio-recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed thematically.

Results: views were divergent when directly considering whether emotional distress could be distinguished from depressive disorder. Some GPs suggested a distinction was not possible as symptoms lay on a continuum, with severity as a proxy for disorder. Others focused on the difficulty of the distinction and were uncertain. Some GPs perceived a distinction and referred to emotional distress as more likely in the presence of a stressor with the absence of biological symptoms. It was also common for GPs to refer to endogenous and reactive depression when considering possible distinctions between distress and depressive disorder.

Conclusions: GPs’ perceptions of when emotional symptoms reflect disorder varied greatly, with a broad range of views presented. Further research is needed to develop more consistent frameworks for understanding emotional symptoms in primary care.

Text
GP Distress Qual Paper-BMJ Open-Resubmission2-Final-Clean - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (59kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 11 November 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 15 December 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 436067
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/436067
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: 8e28049f-1efb-4bb0-bb8b-2c5eda45286a
ORCID for Adam Geraghty: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7984-8351
ORCID for Miriam Santer: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7264-5260
ORCID for Samantha Williams: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9505-6485
ORCID for Tony Kendrick: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1618-9381
ORCID for Paul Little: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3664-1873
ORCID for Michael Moore: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5127-4509

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Nov 2019 17:30
Last modified: 12 Jul 2024 04:06

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Adam Geraghty ORCID iD
Author: Miriam Santer ORCID iD
Author: Charlotte Beavis
Author: Tony Kendrick ORCID iD
Author: Berend Terluin
Author: Paul Little ORCID iD
Author: Michael Moore ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×