The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Conservative treatment for uncomplicated appendicitis in children: the CONTRACT feasibility study, including feasibility RCT

Conservative treatment for uncomplicated appendicitis in children: the CONTRACT feasibility study, including feasibility RCT
Conservative treatment for uncomplicated appendicitis in children: the CONTRACT feasibility study, including feasibility RCT
Background
Whilst non-operative treatment is known to be effective for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children, comparative randomised trial data reporting important outcomes compared to appendicectomy are lacking.

Objectives
To ascertain the feasibility of conducting a multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) testing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a non-operative treatment pathway compared to appendicectomy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children.

•Design
Mixed methods study including: a feasibility RCT; embedded and parallel qualitative and survey studies; parallel health economic feasibility study; development of a core outcome set.

Setting
Three specialist NHS Paediatric Surgical Units in England

Participants
Children (aged 4-15 years) clinically diagnosed with uncomplicated acute appendicitis participated in the feasibility RCT. Children, their families, recruiting clinicians and other healthcare professionals involved in caring for children with appendicitis took part in the qualitative study. UK Specialist Paediatric Surgeons took part in the survey. Specialist Paediatric Surgeons, Adult General Surgeons who treat children, and children and young people who previously had appendicitis along with their families took part in the core outcomes set development.

Interventions
Participants in the feasibility RCT were randomised to a non-operative treatment pathway (broad-spectrum antibiotics and active observation) or appendicectomy.

Main outcome measures
Primary outcome measure was the proportion of eligible patients recruited to the feasibility trial.

Data sources
NHS casenotes, questionnaire responses, transcribed audio recordings of recruitment discussions and qualitative interviews

Results
Overall, 50% (95%CI 40-59) of 115 eligible participants approached about the trial agreed to participate and were randomised. There was high acceptance of randomisation and good adherence to trial procedures and follow-up (follow rates of 89%, 85% and 85% at six weeks, three months and six months respectively). More participants had perforated appendicitis than had been anticipated.

Qualitative work enabled us to: communicate about the trial effectively with patients and families; design and deliver bespoke training to optimise recruitment; and understand how to optimise design and delivery of a future trial.

The health economic study, indicated that the main cost drivers are the ward stay cost and the cost of the operation, and has informed quality of life assessment methods for future work.

A core outcome set for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children and young people was developed, containing 14 outcomes.
There is adequate surgeon interest to justify proceeding to an effectiveness trial with 51% of those surveyed expressing a willingness to recruit with an unchanged trial protocol.

Limitations
Since the feasibility RCT was only performed in three centres we cannot guarantee successful recruitment across a larger number of sites. However, our qualitative work has informed a bespoke training package to facilitate this. Although survey results suggest adequate clinician interest to make a larger trial possible, actual participation may differ, and equipoise may have moved over time.

Conclusions
A future effectiveness trial is feasible following limited additional preparation to establish appropriate outcome measures and case identification. We recommend a limited package of qualitative work be included to optimise recruitment at new centres in particular.

Future work
Prior to proceeding to an effectiveness trial we need to: develop a robust method for distinguishing children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis from those with more advanced appendicitis; reach agreement on a primary outcome measure and effect size that is acceptable to all stakeholder groups involved.

Study registration
ISRCTN15830435.

Funding details
NIHR HTA programme
1366-5278
Hall, Nigel
6919e8af-3890-42c1-98a7-c110791957cf
Sherratt, Frances C.
15d60c07-ff52-4a37-b51e-5de8b39d4624
Eaton, Simon
e14103c2-c06a-45e6-87fe-2358a3371283
Reading, Isabel
6f832276-87b7-4a76-a9ed-b4b3df0a3f66
Walker, Erin
7f02632a-dc68-40e5-aac6-4bf24a877e83
Chorozoglou, Maria
1d8dc56f-914a-402a-8155-4fb1e4380835
Beasant, Lucy
a080197b-17cd-46eb-8622-b9b85f072268
Wood, Wendy
c7e12f30-5332-4717-a0c8-328775e06364
Stanton, Michael
eb3258f5-245b-454a-9556-9ef3d0ebb87d
Corbett, Harriet
eebbc3a7-c4ea-4415-9e29-571fd3fb9e44
Rex, Dean
b1675a45-a338-42b7-b55d-2f86450d79f7
Hutchings, Natalie
b91b8fbd-3eb6-4108-8e8e-ccb78b309a44
Dixon, Elizabeth
f2e33dd1-36f5-4a82-8d3b-ebd5b14cb675
Grist, Simon
5f456afd-1a25-45f7-b770-6eb68a3b10be
Van't Hoff, William
2e765a4d-d3f4-43ce-aa2e-f597cd4f6c31
Crawley, Esther M.
14939e46-323c-45ae-bb61-129edc0429ea
Blazeby, Jane M.
689d490e-fca3-4430-88de-f19ec6cebf58
Young, Bridget
f950d6c8-951a-461a-bf69-5ed67bba2a73
Hall, Nigel
6919e8af-3890-42c1-98a7-c110791957cf
Sherratt, Frances C.
15d60c07-ff52-4a37-b51e-5de8b39d4624
Eaton, Simon
e14103c2-c06a-45e6-87fe-2358a3371283
Reading, Isabel
6f832276-87b7-4a76-a9ed-b4b3df0a3f66
Walker, Erin
7f02632a-dc68-40e5-aac6-4bf24a877e83
Chorozoglou, Maria
1d8dc56f-914a-402a-8155-4fb1e4380835
Beasant, Lucy
a080197b-17cd-46eb-8622-b9b85f072268
Wood, Wendy
c7e12f30-5332-4717-a0c8-328775e06364
Stanton, Michael
eb3258f5-245b-454a-9556-9ef3d0ebb87d
Corbett, Harriet
eebbc3a7-c4ea-4415-9e29-571fd3fb9e44
Rex, Dean
b1675a45-a338-42b7-b55d-2f86450d79f7
Hutchings, Natalie
b91b8fbd-3eb6-4108-8e8e-ccb78b309a44
Dixon, Elizabeth
f2e33dd1-36f5-4a82-8d3b-ebd5b14cb675
Grist, Simon
5f456afd-1a25-45f7-b770-6eb68a3b10be
Van't Hoff, William
2e765a4d-d3f4-43ce-aa2e-f597cd4f6c31
Crawley, Esther M.
14939e46-323c-45ae-bb61-129edc0429ea
Blazeby, Jane M.
689d490e-fca3-4430-88de-f19ec6cebf58
Young, Bridget
f950d6c8-951a-461a-bf69-5ed67bba2a73

Hall, Nigel, Sherratt, Frances C., Eaton, Simon, Reading, Isabel, Walker, Erin, Chorozoglou, Maria, Beasant, Lucy, Wood, Wendy, Stanton, Michael, Corbett, Harriet, Rex, Dean, Hutchings, Natalie, Dixon, Elizabeth, Grist, Simon, Van't Hoff, William, Crawley, Esther M., Blazeby, Jane M. and Young, Bridget (2021) Conservative treatment for uncomplicated appendicitis in children: the CONTRACT feasibility study, including feasibility RCT. Health Technology Assessment, 25 (10). (doi:10.3310/hta25100).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background
Whilst non-operative treatment is known to be effective for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children, comparative randomised trial data reporting important outcomes compared to appendicectomy are lacking.

Objectives
To ascertain the feasibility of conducting a multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) testing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a non-operative treatment pathway compared to appendicectomy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children.

•Design
Mixed methods study including: a feasibility RCT; embedded and parallel qualitative and survey studies; parallel health economic feasibility study; development of a core outcome set.

Setting
Three specialist NHS Paediatric Surgical Units in England

Participants
Children (aged 4-15 years) clinically diagnosed with uncomplicated acute appendicitis participated in the feasibility RCT. Children, their families, recruiting clinicians and other healthcare professionals involved in caring for children with appendicitis took part in the qualitative study. UK Specialist Paediatric Surgeons took part in the survey. Specialist Paediatric Surgeons, Adult General Surgeons who treat children, and children and young people who previously had appendicitis along with their families took part in the core outcomes set development.

Interventions
Participants in the feasibility RCT were randomised to a non-operative treatment pathway (broad-spectrum antibiotics and active observation) or appendicectomy.

Main outcome measures
Primary outcome measure was the proportion of eligible patients recruited to the feasibility trial.

Data sources
NHS casenotes, questionnaire responses, transcribed audio recordings of recruitment discussions and qualitative interviews

Results
Overall, 50% (95%CI 40-59) of 115 eligible participants approached about the trial agreed to participate and were randomised. There was high acceptance of randomisation and good adherence to trial procedures and follow-up (follow rates of 89%, 85% and 85% at six weeks, three months and six months respectively). More participants had perforated appendicitis than had been anticipated.

Qualitative work enabled us to: communicate about the trial effectively with patients and families; design and deliver bespoke training to optimise recruitment; and understand how to optimise design and delivery of a future trial.

The health economic study, indicated that the main cost drivers are the ward stay cost and the cost of the operation, and has informed quality of life assessment methods for future work.

A core outcome set for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children and young people was developed, containing 14 outcomes.
There is adequate surgeon interest to justify proceeding to an effectiveness trial with 51% of those surveyed expressing a willingness to recruit with an unchanged trial protocol.

Limitations
Since the feasibility RCT was only performed in three centres we cannot guarantee successful recruitment across a larger number of sites. However, our qualitative work has informed a bespoke training package to facilitate this. Although survey results suggest adequate clinician interest to make a larger trial possible, actual participation may differ, and equipoise may have moved over time.

Conclusions
A future effectiveness trial is feasible following limited additional preparation to establish appropriate outcome measures and case identification. We recommend a limited package of qualitative work be included to optimise recruitment at new centres in particular.

Future work
Prior to proceeding to an effectiveness trial we need to: develop a robust method for distinguishing children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis from those with more advanced appendicitis; reach agreement on a primary outcome measure and effect size that is acceptable to all stakeholder groups involved.

Study registration
ISRCTN15830435.

Funding details
NIHR HTA programme

Text
HTA Final Report v4 final - Accepted Manuscript
Download (6MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 13 December 2019
Published date: February 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 436691
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/436691
ISSN: 1366-5278
PURE UUID: 365e27ec-8fa3-47fd-93ef-ea42264f050c
ORCID for Nigel Hall: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8570-9374
ORCID for Isabel Reading: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1457-6532
ORCID for Maria Chorozoglou: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5070-4653

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Dec 2019 18:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 05:09

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nigel Hall ORCID iD
Author: Frances C. Sherratt
Author: Simon Eaton
Author: Isabel Reading ORCID iD
Author: Erin Walker
Author: Lucy Beasant
Author: Wendy Wood
Author: Michael Stanton
Author: Harriet Corbett
Author: Dean Rex
Author: Natalie Hutchings
Author: Elizabeth Dixon
Author: Simon Grist
Author: William Van't Hoff
Author: Esther M. Crawley
Author: Jane M. Blazeby
Author: Bridget Young

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×