The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Off the record: Archaeology and documentary filmmaking

Off the record: Archaeology and documentary filmmaking
Off the record: Archaeology and documentary filmmaking
Archaeologists have long expressed frustrations with how archaeology is portrayed in the documentary genre, contending that filmmakers and programme makers sensationalise, dumb-down, and misrepresent the study of the material past on screen. Yet, whilst we demand that “the media” broadly speaking, and “documentary” more specifically, should understand and represent our discipline in all its complexity, we must ask ourselves: are we willing to do the same in return? The purpose of this thesis is to locate archaeology’s place in documentary, and documentary’s place in archaeology. The aim is not to merely interject into the discourse on this matter but to reset the agenda, by profiling, problematizing, and reframing how archaeologists understand the relationship between the discipline of archaeology and the practice of documentary filmmaking, particularly with an eye to a UK context. To this purpose a mixed-methods strategy was undertaken, including: a survey of UK-based archaeologists profiling their experiences of and attitudes to archaeology documentaries; a historical survey of archaeology’s treatment in non-fiction filmmaking from the 1890s to the 2010s; and an autoethnographic study of the making of an archaeology documentary, as seen from the filmmaker’s perspective. By identifying and interrogating the instances of confusion, unease, and conflict that arise when these two fields converge, as well as those instances of shared benefit and similitude, this thesis seeks to cultivate a space for greater awareness, mutual understanding, honest dialogue and intellectual growth. Ultimately, I contend that archaeologists are filmmakers too, and despite the many tensions and misunderstandings between the two fields, nonfiction and documentary filmmaking has indeed played an overlooked and underappreciated role in the conception and development of archaeology as a discipline.
University of Southampton
Rogers, Kathryn Elizabeth
cfebf7ec-8157-4fcd-ab26-a8c8c66f74af
Rogers, Kathryn Elizabeth
cfebf7ec-8157-4fcd-ab26-a8c8c66f74af
Moser, Stephanie
af3009ce-a7c4-4550-a180-7e1987b7deed
Williams, Michael
fdd5b778-38f1-4529-b99c-9d41ab749576
Bull, Anna
67e74291-8c1f-409e-8c84-0416544992b7

Rogers, Kathryn Elizabeth (2019) Off the record: Archaeology and documentary filmmaking. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 429pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Archaeologists have long expressed frustrations with how archaeology is portrayed in the documentary genre, contending that filmmakers and programme makers sensationalise, dumb-down, and misrepresent the study of the material past on screen. Yet, whilst we demand that “the media” broadly speaking, and “documentary” more specifically, should understand and represent our discipline in all its complexity, we must ask ourselves: are we willing to do the same in return? The purpose of this thesis is to locate archaeology’s place in documentary, and documentary’s place in archaeology. The aim is not to merely interject into the discourse on this matter but to reset the agenda, by profiling, problematizing, and reframing how archaeologists understand the relationship between the discipline of archaeology and the practice of documentary filmmaking, particularly with an eye to a UK context. To this purpose a mixed-methods strategy was undertaken, including: a survey of UK-based archaeologists profiling their experiences of and attitudes to archaeology documentaries; a historical survey of archaeology’s treatment in non-fiction filmmaking from the 1890s to the 2010s; and an autoethnographic study of the making of an archaeology documentary, as seen from the filmmaker’s perspective. By identifying and interrogating the instances of confusion, unease, and conflict that arise when these two fields converge, as well as those instances of shared benefit and similitude, this thesis seeks to cultivate a space for greater awareness, mutual understanding, honest dialogue and intellectual growth. Ultimately, I contend that archaeologists are filmmakers too, and despite the many tensions and misunderstandings between the two fields, nonfiction and documentary filmmaking has indeed played an overlooked and underappreciated role in the conception and development of archaeology as a discipline.

Text
KRogers_Thesis - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (10MB)

More information

Published date: September 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 437261
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/437261
PURE UUID: eaec25d1-d0fe-45c7-8fc2-7174da0194e5
ORCID for Kathryn Elizabeth Rogers: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2373-0906
ORCID for Michael Williams: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5386-5567

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Jan 2020 17:34
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:54

Export record

Contributors

Author: Kathryn Elizabeth Rogers ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Stephanie Moser
Thesis advisor: Michael Williams ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Anna Bull

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×