Reviving Bloom’s taxonomy
Reviving Bloom’s taxonomy
The cognitive revolution and the increased focus on evidence-based practice that has swept through the teaching profession in recent years has undoubtedly brought with it many positive outcomes. Yet in the rush to embrace the modern, it would be wise to remember that many of these new ideas have very old roots, and rather than disregard the ancestral wisdom of our profession, we would be wise to look for guidance at the successes and failures of our forebears. Doing otherwise will inevitably lead to the educational equivalent of reinventing the wheel, and one need not look far for pertinent examples – after all, are Bruner’s (Wood et al. 1976) thoughts on scaffolding so very different from cognitive load’s guidance fading? Similarly, it does not take a huge leap of the imagination to see Ausubel’s (1960) advance organisers and the more modern knowledge organisers as examples of the educational version of parallel evolution. However, this cyclical tendency is not inevitable, and the current interest in mastery learning provides a wonderful opportunity to escape the reinvention trap by building on and learning from one of the classics of educational literature, Bloom’s taxonomy.
Bokhove, Christian
7fc17e5b-9a94-48f3-a387-2ccf60d2d5d8
Campbell, Ryan
21393cab-98e3-4214-85d1-868afc9449cb
29 January 2020
Bokhove, Christian
7fc17e5b-9a94-48f3-a387-2ccf60d2d5d8
Campbell, Ryan
21393cab-98e3-4214-85d1-868afc9449cb
Bokhove, Christian and Campbell, Ryan
(2020)
Reviving Bloom’s taxonomy.
Impact, 8.
Abstract
The cognitive revolution and the increased focus on evidence-based practice that has swept through the teaching profession in recent years has undoubtedly brought with it many positive outcomes. Yet in the rush to embrace the modern, it would be wise to remember that many of these new ideas have very old roots, and rather than disregard the ancestral wisdom of our profession, we would be wise to look for guidance at the successes and failures of our forebears. Doing otherwise will inevitably lead to the educational equivalent of reinventing the wheel, and one need not look far for pertinent examples – after all, are Bruner’s (Wood et al. 1976) thoughts on scaffolding so very different from cognitive load’s guidance fading? Similarly, it does not take a huge leap of the imagination to see Ausubel’s (1960) advance organisers and the more modern knowledge organisers as examples of the educational version of parallel evolution. However, this cyclical tendency is not inevitable, and the current interest in mastery learning provides a wonderful opportunity to escape the reinvention trap by building on and learning from one of the classics of educational literature, Bloom’s taxonomy.
Text
RevivedBloom_revision accepted manuscript
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 9 January 2020
Published date: 29 January 2020
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 437441
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/437441
ISSN: 2514-6955
PURE UUID: 1a29bf7e-e698-48c8-a265-3ffc87bf6d52
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Jan 2020 17:37
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 05:14
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Ryan Campbell
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics