The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Decision regret in men living with and beyond non-metastatic prostate cancer in the UK: a population-based patient-reported outcome study

Decision regret in men living with and beyond non-metastatic prostate cancer in the UK: a population-based patient-reported outcome study
Decision regret in men living with and beyond non-metastatic prostate cancer in the UK: a population-based patient-reported outcome study
Objective: Clinical options for managing non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) vary. Each option has associated side-effects leading to difficulty in decision-making. This study aimed to assess the relationship between patient involvement in treatment decision-making and subsequent decision regret (DR), and quantify the impact of health-related quality of life (HRQL) outcomes on DR.

Methods: Men living in the United Kingdom, 18-42 months post-diagnosis of PCa were identified from cancer registration data and sent a questionnaire. Measures included the Decision Regret Scale (DRS), Expanded Prostate cancer Index Composite short form (EPIC-26), EQ-5D-5L and an item on involvement in treatment decision-making. Multivariable ordinal regression was utilised with DR categorised as none, mild or moderate/severe regret.

Results: 17,193 men with stage I-III PCa completed the DRS: 36.6% reported no regret, 43.3% mild regret and 20.0% moderate/severe regret. The odds of reporting DR were greater if men indicated their views were not taken into account (OR=6.42, 95%CI 5.39-7.64) or were involved ‘to some extent’ in decision-making (OR=4.63, 95%CI 4.27-5.02), compared to men who were ‘definitely’ involved. After adjustment, including for involvement, men reporting moderate/big problems with urinary, bowel or sexual function were more likely to experience regret compared to men with no/small problems. Better HRQL scores were associated with lower levels of DR.

Conclusions: This large-scale study demonstrates the benefit of patient involvement in treatment decision-making for non-metastatic PCa. However, men experiencing side-effects and poorer HRQL report greater DR. Promoting engagement in clinical decision-making represents good practice and may reduce the risk of subsequent regret.
LAPCD, cancer, decision regret, involvement in decision-making, oncology, patient-reported outcomes, prostate cancer, treatment decision-making
1057-9249
886-893
Wilding, Sarah
7bccb041-8906-4c7a-8d0f-153e8ceb63c4
Downing, Amy
299e08f1-6b70-4dc6-8728-f89e7b2cab1e
Selby, Peter
1986b302-f05e-40ed-bf85-dcfcc5742715
Cross, William
e59d3098-e39a-439a-8842-96f23f4412ce
Wright, Penny
6ff24015-f755-4d1b-b584-dd1f8e55c238
Watson, Eila K.
e882a33e-bf0c-4a69-a000-114855a0efa7
Wagland, Richard
16a44dcc-29cd-4797-9af2-41ef87f64d08
Kind, Paul
cdebc36a-5f40-41fa-af95-a66bcda061d0
Donnelly, David W.
e6b2d22d-21f5-460c-9492-220b27639c67
Hounsome, Luke
205a5ebb-0fec-4cbc-8756-117dcc79bd15
Mottram, Rebecca
2cef8c97-57db-4b6d-8160-bb90cc3dc09a
Allen, Majorie
a03c4578-b5b2-4f60-9bce-4a70d1d19436
Kearney, Therese
7935f7cc-62fc-4246-88f5-fd7f095dfb6c
Butcher, Hugh
e092a262-86c3-4a08-8724-328932cc682d
Gavin, Anna
e887a323-7787-4455-82f7-531198db885d
Glaser, Adam
cd9ec1e8-f9ed-4451-a404-b8a93c2b3089
Wilding, Sarah
7bccb041-8906-4c7a-8d0f-153e8ceb63c4
Downing, Amy
299e08f1-6b70-4dc6-8728-f89e7b2cab1e
Selby, Peter
1986b302-f05e-40ed-bf85-dcfcc5742715
Cross, William
e59d3098-e39a-439a-8842-96f23f4412ce
Wright, Penny
6ff24015-f755-4d1b-b584-dd1f8e55c238
Watson, Eila K.
e882a33e-bf0c-4a69-a000-114855a0efa7
Wagland, Richard
16a44dcc-29cd-4797-9af2-41ef87f64d08
Kind, Paul
cdebc36a-5f40-41fa-af95-a66bcda061d0
Donnelly, David W.
e6b2d22d-21f5-460c-9492-220b27639c67
Hounsome, Luke
205a5ebb-0fec-4cbc-8756-117dcc79bd15
Mottram, Rebecca
2cef8c97-57db-4b6d-8160-bb90cc3dc09a
Allen, Majorie
a03c4578-b5b2-4f60-9bce-4a70d1d19436
Kearney, Therese
7935f7cc-62fc-4246-88f5-fd7f095dfb6c
Butcher, Hugh
e092a262-86c3-4a08-8724-328932cc682d
Gavin, Anna
e887a323-7787-4455-82f7-531198db885d
Glaser, Adam
cd9ec1e8-f9ed-4451-a404-b8a93c2b3089

Wilding, Sarah, Downing, Amy, Selby, Peter, Cross, William, Wright, Penny, Watson, Eila K., Wagland, Richard, Kind, Paul, Donnelly, David W., Hounsome, Luke, Mottram, Rebecca, Allen, Majorie, Kearney, Therese, Butcher, Hugh, Gavin, Anna and Glaser, Adam (2020) Decision regret in men living with and beyond non-metastatic prostate cancer in the UK: a population-based patient-reported outcome study. Psycho-Oncology, 29 (5), 886-893. (doi:10.1002/pon.5362).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: Clinical options for managing non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) vary. Each option has associated side-effects leading to difficulty in decision-making. This study aimed to assess the relationship between patient involvement in treatment decision-making and subsequent decision regret (DR), and quantify the impact of health-related quality of life (HRQL) outcomes on DR.

Methods: Men living in the United Kingdom, 18-42 months post-diagnosis of PCa were identified from cancer registration data and sent a questionnaire. Measures included the Decision Regret Scale (DRS), Expanded Prostate cancer Index Composite short form (EPIC-26), EQ-5D-5L and an item on involvement in treatment decision-making. Multivariable ordinal regression was utilised with DR categorised as none, mild or moderate/severe regret.

Results: 17,193 men with stage I-III PCa completed the DRS: 36.6% reported no regret, 43.3% mild regret and 20.0% moderate/severe regret. The odds of reporting DR were greater if men indicated their views were not taken into account (OR=6.42, 95%CI 5.39-7.64) or were involved ‘to some extent’ in decision-making (OR=4.63, 95%CI 4.27-5.02), compared to men who were ‘definitely’ involved. After adjustment, including for involvement, men reporting moderate/big problems with urinary, bowel or sexual function were more likely to experience regret compared to men with no/small problems. Better HRQL scores were associated with lower levels of DR.

Conclusions: This large-scale study demonstrates the benefit of patient involvement in treatment decision-making for non-metastatic PCa. However, men experiencing side-effects and poorer HRQL report greater DR. Promoting engagement in clinical decision-making represents good practice and may reduce the risk of subsequent regret.

Text
Decision regret in men living with and beyond non-metastatic prostate cancer in the UK a population-based patient-reported outcome study - Accepted Manuscript
Download (98kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 11 February 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 17 February 2020
Published date: May 2020
Keywords: LAPCD, cancer, decision regret, involvement in decision-making, oncology, patient-reported outcomes, prostate cancer, treatment decision-making

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 437674
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/437674
ISSN: 1057-9249
PURE UUID: c612ad2b-00fe-4478-862b-11cdc4ec80f2
ORCID for Richard Wagland: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1825-7587

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Feb 2020 17:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 05:20

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sarah Wilding
Author: Amy Downing
Author: Peter Selby
Author: William Cross
Author: Penny Wright
Author: Eila K. Watson
Author: Richard Wagland ORCID iD
Author: Paul Kind
Author: David W. Donnelly
Author: Luke Hounsome
Author: Rebecca Mottram
Author: Majorie Allen
Author: Therese Kearney
Author: Hugh Butcher
Author: Anna Gavin
Author: Adam Glaser

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×