The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Factors within skin cancer that contribute to metastasis

Factors within skin cancer that contribute to metastasis
Factors within skin cancer that contribute to metastasis
Skin cancer is the most frequent cancer worldwide and accounts for 1 in every 3 cancers diagnosed. Skin cancer comprises of melanoma, arising from the melanocytes of the skin and keratinocyte carcinomas which arise in the keratinocytes and include cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and basal cell carcinoma. cSCC predominantly affects the older generation and is one of the most common types of cancer capable of metastasising, with 5 year survival rates reported as <30%. Although less common, melanoma can affect all ages and has one of the highest rates of metastasis of any cancer, with 5 year survival rates as low as 23%, depending on whether or not distant metastasis has occurred. There are currently very few prognostic markers capable of predicting metastasis in these skin cancers. Presently in the UK, melanoma is graded according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer Guidelines (AJCC) whereas cSCCs are categorised as high or low risk according to the British Association of Dermatologists’ guidelines (BAD). Other staging systems have been proposed but most of them also rely on histological features such as differentiation, diameter, depth, site and/or Clark’s level, amongst others. This study aimed to identify factors within cSCC and melanoma which contribute to metastasis using a mass spectrometry based proteomics approach. A method to extract protein from formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) samples was developed and optimised. Proteins were extracted from 24 FFPE surgically excised primary cSCC (P-NM) and melanoma (Pmel-NM) tumours which had not metastasised at 5 years post-operatively and from 24 FFPE surgically excised primary metastatic cSCC (P-M) and melanoma (PmelM) tumours which had metastasised. A total of 144 and 31 significantly differentially expressed proteins between metastatic and non-metastatic samples were identified in the cSCC and melanoma groups respectively. KEGG, gene ontology, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) highlighted several key pathways likely to be involved in development of metastasis in cSCC and melanoma. Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) of two proteins, ANXA5 and DDOST, verified the original differences in levels of these proteins in cSCC and also validated these findings in an independent sample cohort. Additionally, MRM analysis and machine learning revealed that the combination of ANXA5 and DDOST levels could correctly predict metastasis better than any guideline in current clinical use, with an AUC of 0.929, sensitivity and specificity of 88.24% and 94.12% respectively. However, MRM was technically challenging in the melanoma group and was not able to verify the original melanoma mass spectroscopy results. Machine learning and modelling of histological characteristics from cSCC samples was subsequently undertaken to see whether it was possible to improve on current prediction of prognosis with these readily available parameters. Surprisingly, this produced a prediction model with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.997 and a sensitivity and specificity of 94.1% and 100% respectively. Despite this model not requiring any additional work over and above that which is already currently reported histologically when cSCCs are routinely excised in the UK, it was better than the aforementioned ANXA5 and DDOST model and moreover, than any guideline in clinical use at the present time. Moreover, this model has the potential to be integrated into a clinical setting with relative ease and speed. This study has identified a number of factors, including key pathways that likely contribute to metastasis in cSCC and melanoma. In addition, the combination of proteomics, machine learning and mathematical modelling has identified key prognostic indicators in cSCC and has demonstrated that this approach may have potential to do likewise in many other cancer types.
University of Southampton
Shapanis, Andrew George
98b07884-92a9-4c00-afad-12194e339cbc
Shapanis, Andrew George
98b07884-92a9-4c00-afad-12194e339cbc
Healy, Eugene
400fc04d-f81a-474a-ae25-7ff894be0ebd
Skipp, Paul
1ba7dcf6-9fe7-4b5c-a9d0-e32ed7f42aa5
Ottensmeier, Christian
42b8a398-baac-4843-a3d6-056225675797
Madsen, Jens
b5d8ae35-00ac-4d19-930e-d8ddec497359

Shapanis, Andrew George (2019) Factors within skin cancer that contribute to metastasis. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 309pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Skin cancer is the most frequent cancer worldwide and accounts for 1 in every 3 cancers diagnosed. Skin cancer comprises of melanoma, arising from the melanocytes of the skin and keratinocyte carcinomas which arise in the keratinocytes and include cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and basal cell carcinoma. cSCC predominantly affects the older generation and is one of the most common types of cancer capable of metastasising, with 5 year survival rates reported as <30%. Although less common, melanoma can affect all ages and has one of the highest rates of metastasis of any cancer, with 5 year survival rates as low as 23%, depending on whether or not distant metastasis has occurred. There are currently very few prognostic markers capable of predicting metastasis in these skin cancers. Presently in the UK, melanoma is graded according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer Guidelines (AJCC) whereas cSCCs are categorised as high or low risk according to the British Association of Dermatologists’ guidelines (BAD). Other staging systems have been proposed but most of them also rely on histological features such as differentiation, diameter, depth, site and/or Clark’s level, amongst others. This study aimed to identify factors within cSCC and melanoma which contribute to metastasis using a mass spectrometry based proteomics approach. A method to extract protein from formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) samples was developed and optimised. Proteins were extracted from 24 FFPE surgically excised primary cSCC (P-NM) and melanoma (Pmel-NM) tumours which had not metastasised at 5 years post-operatively and from 24 FFPE surgically excised primary metastatic cSCC (P-M) and melanoma (PmelM) tumours which had metastasised. A total of 144 and 31 significantly differentially expressed proteins between metastatic and non-metastatic samples were identified in the cSCC and melanoma groups respectively. KEGG, gene ontology, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) highlighted several key pathways likely to be involved in development of metastasis in cSCC and melanoma. Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) of two proteins, ANXA5 and DDOST, verified the original differences in levels of these proteins in cSCC and also validated these findings in an independent sample cohort. Additionally, MRM analysis and machine learning revealed that the combination of ANXA5 and DDOST levels could correctly predict metastasis better than any guideline in current clinical use, with an AUC of 0.929, sensitivity and specificity of 88.24% and 94.12% respectively. However, MRM was technically challenging in the melanoma group and was not able to verify the original melanoma mass spectroscopy results. Machine learning and modelling of histological characteristics from cSCC samples was subsequently undertaken to see whether it was possible to improve on current prediction of prognosis with these readily available parameters. Surprisingly, this produced a prediction model with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.997 and a sensitivity and specificity of 94.1% and 100% respectively. Despite this model not requiring any additional work over and above that which is already currently reported histologically when cSCCs are routinely excised in the UK, it was better than the aforementioned ANXA5 and DDOST model and moreover, than any guideline in clinical use at the present time. Moreover, this model has the potential to be integrated into a clinical setting with relative ease and speed. This study has identified a number of factors, including key pathways that likely contribute to metastasis in cSCC and melanoma. In addition, the combination of proteomics, machine learning and mathematical modelling has identified key prognostic indicators in cSCC and has demonstrated that this approach may have potential to do likewise in many other cancer types.

Text
Andrew Shapanis - PhD Thesis (no ref) - Final Bound - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (14MB)

More information

Submitted date: July 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 437792
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/437792
PURE UUID: e6966fc2-4dcc-490a-8822-844fea247a5d
ORCID for Andrew George Shapanis: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4147-6956
ORCID for Paul Skipp: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2995-2959
ORCID for Jens Madsen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1664-7645

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Feb 2020 17:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 05:17

Export record

Contributors

Thesis advisor: Eugene Healy
Thesis advisor: Paul Skipp ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Christian Ottensmeier
Thesis advisor: Jens Madsen ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×