Reviewing challenges and the future for qualitative interviewing
Reviewing challenges and the future for qualitative interviewing
In this article, we consider challenges for the existence and practice of qualitative research interviews. We review key features of qualitative interviewing, in particular the debate over the radical critique of interviewing and the nature of the data it generates, to set the scene for our arguments about the current standing and future prognosis for the method of generating data and the technologies that enable this. We look at qualitative interviewing in the context of the political project of neoliberalism and the regime of austerity associated with it, and the linked turn to what is known as ‘big data’, a feature of digital technological developments in garnering data. Qualitative researchers using interview methods have been creative in working with and resisting features of neoliberal austerity pragmatically and politically, and we provide some examples. We also consider an epistemological challenge and resistance from outside of the dominant framework–interviewing in indigenous methodologies. We argue that it is the relationship between the interview as a method of data generation for research and the ways of knowing about the world, that is the epistemology that the interview-based research proceeds from, that is crucial in considering the potentials for the method’s practice.
epistemology; neo-liberal context; qualitative interviews; radical critique; resistors
581-592
Edwards, Rosalind
e43912c0-f149-4457-81a9-9c4e00a4bb42
Holland, Janet
e80f74b2-5288-46bc-b0e6-1e019c5a916a
2 September 2020
Edwards, Rosalind
e43912c0-f149-4457-81a9-9c4e00a4bb42
Holland, Janet
e80f74b2-5288-46bc-b0e6-1e019c5a916a
Edwards, Rosalind and Holland, Janet
(2020)
Reviewing challenges and the future for qualitative interviewing.
International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 23 (5), .
(doi:10.1080/13645579.2020.1766767).
Abstract
In this article, we consider challenges for the existence and practice of qualitative research interviews. We review key features of qualitative interviewing, in particular the debate over the radical critique of interviewing and the nature of the data it generates, to set the scene for our arguments about the current standing and future prognosis for the method of generating data and the technologies that enable this. We look at qualitative interviewing in the context of the political project of neoliberalism and the regime of austerity associated with it, and the linked turn to what is known as ‘big data’, a feature of digital technological developments in garnering data. Qualitative researchers using interview methods have been creative in working with and resisting features of neoliberal austerity pragmatically and politically, and we provide some examples. We also consider an epistemological challenge and resistance from outside of the dominant framework–interviewing in indigenous methodologies. We argue that it is the relationship between the interview as a method of data generation for research and the ways of knowing about the world, that is the epistemology that the interview-based research proceeds from, that is crucial in considering the potentials for the method’s practice.
Text
2019 12 12 IJSRM interviews article v2rev
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 1 May 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 18 May 2020
Published date: 2 September 2020
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Keywords:
epistemology; neo-liberal context; qualitative interviews; radical critique; resistors
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 440721
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/440721
ISSN: 1364-5579
PURE UUID: f6d1a7fb-2f4c-42b0-8493-5777e471cb19
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 May 2020 16:31
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 04:11
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Janet Holland
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics