Assessing international relations in undergraduate education
Assessing international relations in undergraduate education
This paper advocates a holistic approach to assessing international relations in undergraduate education, which revolves around: (a) essays and (b) active learning-related tasks, such as simulation reflective statements/reports and performance. The paper argues that, on the one hand, academic essays are far from irrelevant and it is difficult to overestimate their practical significance. On the other hand, active learning-related tasks are best utilised as a supplementary assessment, expanding the students’ range of transferable skills. The assessment structure advocated in this paper results from a holistic approach to assessment design, which includes teacher’s own experience, familiarity with pedagogical scholarship and input from students. This last element is the least common even though it makes sense to understand how students see their own assessment. To that end, the paper shares the results of a pilot project run at one of the UK universities, which engaged students as partners in rethinking their assessment.
Assessment, Essays, International relations, Simulations
Zwolski, Kamil
eadd4b99-f0db-41b8-a3a1-f71918f09975
Zwolski, Kamil
eadd4b99-f0db-41b8-a3a1-f71918f09975
Abstract
This paper advocates a holistic approach to assessing international relations in undergraduate education, which revolves around: (a) essays and (b) active learning-related tasks, such as simulation reflective statements/reports and performance. The paper argues that, on the one hand, academic essays are far from irrelevant and it is difficult to overestimate their practical significance. On the other hand, active learning-related tasks are best utilised as a supplementary assessment, expanding the students’ range of transferable skills. The assessment structure advocated in this paper results from a holistic approach to assessment design, which includes teacher’s own experience, familiarity with pedagogical scholarship and input from students. This last element is the least common even though it makes sense to understand how students see their own assessment. To that end, the paper shares the results of a pilot project run at one of the UK universities, which engaged students as partners in rethinking their assessment.
Text
Zwolski_revised_paper
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 6 May 2020
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, European Consortium for Political Research.
Keywords:
Assessment, Essays, International relations, Simulations
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 440928
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/440928
ISSN: 1680-4333
PURE UUID: 339aff55-31a1-47ed-9b53-e38ff0ec5499
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 22 May 2020 16:40
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 05:33
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics