The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A randomised phase II trial of carboplatin and gemcitabine +/- vandetanib in first line treatment of advanced urothelial cell cancer patients not suitable to receive cisplatin

A randomised phase II trial of carboplatin and gemcitabine +/- vandetanib in first line treatment of advanced urothelial cell cancer patients not suitable to receive cisplatin
A randomised phase II trial of carboplatin and gemcitabine +/- vandetanib in first line treatment of advanced urothelial cell cancer patients not suitable to receive cisplatin

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of the dual epidermal growth factor receptor/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor, vandetanib, in combination with carboplatin and gemcitabine in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma urothelial cancer (UC) who were unsuitable for cisplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2011 to 2014, 82 patients were randomised from 16 hospitals across the UK into the TOUCAN double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised Phase II trial, receiving six 21-day cycles of intravenous carboplatin (target area under the concentration versus time curve 4.5, day 1) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 days 1 and 8) combined with either oral vandetanib 100 mg or placebo (once daily). Progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint), adverse events, tolerability and feasibility of use, objective response rate and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were used to analyse the primary endpoint.

RESULTS: The 82 patients were randomised 1:1 to vandetanib (n = 40) or placebo (n = 42), and 25 patients (30%) completed six cycles of all allocated treatment. Toxicity Grade ≥3 was experienced in 80% (n = 32) and 76% (n = 32) of patients in the vandetanib and placebo arms, respectively. The median PFS was 6.8 and 8.8 months for the vandetanib and placebo arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-1.76; P = 0.71); the median OS was 10.8 vs 13.8 months (HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.79-2.52; P = 0.88); and radiological response rates were 50% and 55%.

CONCLUSION: There is no evidence that vandetanib improves clinical outcome in this setting. Our present data do not support its adoption as the regimen of choice for first-line treatment in patients with UC who were unfit for cisplatin.

carboplatin, gemcitabine, randomised controlled trial, tyrosine kinase inhibitor, urothelial carcinoma, vandetanib
1464-4096
292-299
Jones, Robert
c8f8587e-d585-4177-bc9c-730c2e14a432
Crabb, Simon
bcd1b566-7677-4f81-8429-3ab0e85f8373
Chester, John
c055dcc5-6b69-42e7-a61f-d5043bd3e69b
Elliott, Tony
494b0d76-db11-4ef0-bbdb-bd023794726a
Huddart, Robert
9b98e268-407a-4dc5-85de-884cadb943a7
Birtle, Alison
1031c636-ab1a-4bc5-b053-5f1334c6c087
Evans, Linda
5a5a7a8e-8b7d-44e4-a56e-9d7e206289a7
Lester, Jason
3a715211-2b06-4c31-b02b-ceeb9e757a2a
Jagdev, Satinder
a5fcb618-852f-4a09-96b0-c7afb5582163
Casbard, Angela
b459a5a2-036d-4916-b3b7-d4a4e07221cc
Huang, Chao
50b2fa87-586b-40e2-9f5b-0b911f046371
Madden, Tracie-Ann
56464430-bf0b-437a-91ad-ba1663646f6d
Griffiths, Gareth
7fd300c0-d279-4ff6-842d-aa1f2b9b864d
Jones, Robert
c8f8587e-d585-4177-bc9c-730c2e14a432
Crabb, Simon
bcd1b566-7677-4f81-8429-3ab0e85f8373
Chester, John
c055dcc5-6b69-42e7-a61f-d5043bd3e69b
Elliott, Tony
494b0d76-db11-4ef0-bbdb-bd023794726a
Huddart, Robert
9b98e268-407a-4dc5-85de-884cadb943a7
Birtle, Alison
1031c636-ab1a-4bc5-b053-5f1334c6c087
Evans, Linda
5a5a7a8e-8b7d-44e4-a56e-9d7e206289a7
Lester, Jason
3a715211-2b06-4c31-b02b-ceeb9e757a2a
Jagdev, Satinder
a5fcb618-852f-4a09-96b0-c7afb5582163
Casbard, Angela
b459a5a2-036d-4916-b3b7-d4a4e07221cc
Huang, Chao
50b2fa87-586b-40e2-9f5b-0b911f046371
Madden, Tracie-Ann
56464430-bf0b-437a-91ad-ba1663646f6d
Griffiths, Gareth
7fd300c0-d279-4ff6-842d-aa1f2b9b864d

Jones, Robert, Crabb, Simon, Chester, John, Elliott, Tony, Huddart, Robert, Birtle, Alison, Evans, Linda, Lester, Jason, Jagdev, Satinder, Casbard, Angela, Huang, Chao, Madden, Tracie-Ann and Griffiths, Gareth (2020) A randomised phase II trial of carboplatin and gemcitabine +/- vandetanib in first line treatment of advanced urothelial cell cancer patients not suitable to receive cisplatin. BJU International, 126 (2), 292-299. (doi:10.1111/bju.15096).

Record type: Article

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of the dual epidermal growth factor receptor/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor, vandetanib, in combination with carboplatin and gemcitabine in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma urothelial cancer (UC) who were unsuitable for cisplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2011 to 2014, 82 patients were randomised from 16 hospitals across the UK into the TOUCAN double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised Phase II trial, receiving six 21-day cycles of intravenous carboplatin (target area under the concentration versus time curve 4.5, day 1) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 days 1 and 8) combined with either oral vandetanib 100 mg or placebo (once daily). Progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint), adverse events, tolerability and feasibility of use, objective response rate and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were used to analyse the primary endpoint.

RESULTS: The 82 patients were randomised 1:1 to vandetanib (n = 40) or placebo (n = 42), and 25 patients (30%) completed six cycles of all allocated treatment. Toxicity Grade ≥3 was experienced in 80% (n = 32) and 76% (n = 32) of patients in the vandetanib and placebo arms, respectively. The median PFS was 6.8 and 8.8 months for the vandetanib and placebo arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-1.76; P = 0.71); the median OS was 10.8 vs 13.8 months (HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.79-2.52; P = 0.88); and radiological response rates were 50% and 55%.

CONCLUSION: There is no evidence that vandetanib improves clinical outcome in this setting. Our present data do not support its adoption as the regimen of choice for first-line treatment in patients with UC who were unfit for cisplatin.

Text
TOUCAN trial BJUI 9_3_20 - Accepted Manuscript
Download (347kB)

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 25 April 2020
Published date: 1 August 2020
Keywords: carboplatin, gemcitabine, randomised controlled trial, tyrosine kinase inhibitor, urothelial carcinoma, vandetanib

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 441071
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/441071
ISSN: 1464-4096
PURE UUID: 01829768-909d-4b90-9c27-a2a8b672d98b
ORCID for Simon Crabb: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3521-9064
ORCID for Gareth Griffiths: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9579-8021

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 May 2020 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 05:35

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Robert Jones
Author: Simon Crabb ORCID iD
Author: John Chester
Author: Tony Elliott
Author: Robert Huddart
Author: Alison Birtle
Author: Linda Evans
Author: Jason Lester
Author: Satinder Jagdev
Author: Angela Casbard
Author: Chao Huang
Author: Tracie-Ann Madden

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×