The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The ups and downs of social life: within-person variations in daily status and inclusion differentially predict self-regard and interpersonal behavior

The ups and downs of social life: within-person variations in daily status and inclusion differentially predict self-regard and interpersonal behavior
The ups and downs of social life: within-person variations in daily status and inclusion differentially predict self-regard and interpersonal behavior
Objective: grounded in sociometer theory and hierometer theory, the current research examined, for the first time, how within‐person fluctuations in people’s status and inclusion relate to their self‐regard and interpersonal behavior.

Method: we conducted a 10‐day diary study and analyzed the data using multilevel modeling. Participants (N =415) completed daily measures of their status, inclusion, self‐esteem, narcissism, assertiveness, and affiliativeness.

Results: on days when both their status and inclusion were higher, participants reported higher self‐esteem, but only on days when their status was higher did they report higher narcissism. Furthermore, on days when their self‐esteem was higher, participants behaved more assertively and more affiliatively, but only on days when their narcissism was higher, did they behave more assertively. These patterns persisted after controlling for baseline individual differences in all constructs. Self‐esteem, moreover, mediated the links between daily status and assertiveness, and between daily inclusion and affiliativeness; narcissism, in contrast, mediated the link between daily status and assertiveness only.

Conclusions: this research replicates at the within‐person level empirical links previously found at the between‐person level. The results suggest that narcissism operates chiefly as a hierometer (tracking status and regulating assertiveness), whereas self‐esteem additionally operates as a sociometer (also tracking inclusion and regulating affiliativeness).
inclusion, interpersonal behavior, narcissism, self-esteem, self-regard, status, within-person variability
0022-3506
1111-1128
Mahadevan, Nikhila
6fdfa44a-a12b-447a-b6d6-be818c4f2d69
Gregg, Aiden
1b03bb58-b3a5-4852-a177-29e4f633b063
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Mahadevan, Nikhila
6fdfa44a-a12b-447a-b6d6-be818c4f2d69
Gregg, Aiden
1b03bb58-b3a5-4852-a177-29e4f633b063
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2

Mahadevan, Nikhila, Gregg, Aiden and Sedikides, Constantine (2020) The ups and downs of social life: within-person variations in daily status and inclusion differentially predict self-regard and interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality, 88 (6), 1111-1128. (doi:10.1111/jopy.12559).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: grounded in sociometer theory and hierometer theory, the current research examined, for the first time, how within‐person fluctuations in people’s status and inclusion relate to their self‐regard and interpersonal behavior.

Method: we conducted a 10‐day diary study and analyzed the data using multilevel modeling. Participants (N =415) completed daily measures of their status, inclusion, self‐esteem, narcissism, assertiveness, and affiliativeness.

Results: on days when both their status and inclusion were higher, participants reported higher self‐esteem, but only on days when their status was higher did they report higher narcissism. Furthermore, on days when their self‐esteem was higher, participants behaved more assertively and more affiliatively, but only on days when their narcissism was higher, did they behave more assertively. These patterns persisted after controlling for baseline individual differences in all constructs. Self‐esteem, moreover, mediated the links between daily status and assertiveness, and between daily inclusion and affiliativeness; narcissism, in contrast, mediated the link between daily status and assertiveness only.

Conclusions: this research replicates at the within‐person level empirical links previously found at the between‐person level. The results suggest that narcissism operates chiefly as a hierometer (tracking status and regulating assertiveness), whereas self‐esteem additionally operates as a sociometer (also tracking inclusion and regulating affiliativeness).

Text
Mahadevan, Gregg, Sedikides_in press_JOPY
Download (134kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 24 May 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 30 May 2020
Published date: 1 December 2020
Additional Information: Funding Information: The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Personality published by Wiley Periodicals LLC
Keywords: inclusion, interpersonal behavior, narcissism, self-esteem, self-regard, status, within-person variability

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 441102
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/441102
ISSN: 0022-3506
PURE UUID: 931ab715-84d6-4fdc-8d90-8987de85020d
ORCID for Constantine Sedikides: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4036-889X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Jun 2020 16:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 05:35

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×