The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The impact of radiotherapy on patient-reported outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh

The impact of radiotherapy on patient-reported outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh
The impact of radiotherapy on patient-reported outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh

OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of PMRT on PROs of IBBR performed with and without mesh.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PMRT is increasingly given to improve breast cancer outcomes but can adversely impact complications after IBBR. Little; however, is known about the impact of PMRT on the PROs of IBBR, especially when mesh is used.

METHODS: The implant Breast Reconstruction evAluation prospective cohort study recruited consecutive women undergoing immediate IBBR from 81 UK breast and plastic surgical units. Demographic, operative, oncological, and 3-month complication data were collected, and patients consented to receive validated PRO questionnaires at 18-months. The association between IBBR, PMRT, and PROs were investigated using mixed-effects regression models adjusted for clinically-relevant confounders and including a random-effect to account for potential clustering by center RESULTS:: A total of 1163 women consented to receive 18-month questionnaires of whom 730 (63%) completed it. Patients undergoing PMRT (214 patients) reported worse PROs in 3 BREAST-Q domains: satisfaction with breasts [-6.27 points, P = 0.008, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-10.91, -1.63)], satisfaction with outcome [-7.53 points, P = 0.002, CI (-12.20, -2.85)] and physical well-being [-6.55 points, P < 0.001, CI (-9.43, -3.67)]. Overall satisfaction was worse in the PMRT group [OR 0.497, P = 0.002, CI (0.32, 0.77)]. These effects were not ameliorated by mesh use.

CONCLUSIONS: PMRT may adversely affect PROs after IBBR irrespective of whether mesh is used. These findings should be discussed with all patients considering IBBR and when indications for PMRT are borderline to enable informed decision-making regarding oncological and reconstructive treatment options.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN37664281.

0003-4932
Stewart, Emma
0828b3f6-68e6-42ac-813d-27f04622a55d
Turner, Nicholas
74b66b66-651c-45ba-8796-56fa53d67d3e
Conroy, Elizabeth
d7b32114-3df3-4edb-9751-107ca8087db6
Cutress, Ramsey
68ae4f86-e8cf-411f-a335-cdba51797406
Skillman, Joanna
c256c949-2985-4228-adf3-3a49e6b5f89f
Whisker, Lisa
027116b4-974a-45fa-bd29-5e92e610e155
Thrush, Steven
b2ac6055-b39f-4083-8db3-e0b7644a8c52
Barnes, Nicola
8d8289ce-48da-43bc-af15-0109c2e95e25
Holcombe, Chris
f9196a8b-3f04-49cf-aa7b-e0a3e02caa57
Potter, Shelley
77970724-8e7c-47cb-973c-d5a7c6bd783c
iBRA Steering Group and the Breast Reconstruction Research Collaborative
Stewart, Emma
0828b3f6-68e6-42ac-813d-27f04622a55d
Turner, Nicholas
74b66b66-651c-45ba-8796-56fa53d67d3e
Conroy, Elizabeth
d7b32114-3df3-4edb-9751-107ca8087db6
Cutress, Ramsey
68ae4f86-e8cf-411f-a335-cdba51797406
Skillman, Joanna
c256c949-2985-4228-adf3-3a49e6b5f89f
Whisker, Lisa
027116b4-974a-45fa-bd29-5e92e610e155
Thrush, Steven
b2ac6055-b39f-4083-8db3-e0b7644a8c52
Barnes, Nicola
8d8289ce-48da-43bc-af15-0109c2e95e25
Holcombe, Chris
f9196a8b-3f04-49cf-aa7b-e0a3e02caa57
Potter, Shelley
77970724-8e7c-47cb-973c-d5a7c6bd783c

Stewart, Emma, Turner, Nicholas, Conroy, Elizabeth, Cutress, Ramsey, Skillman, Joanna, Whisker, Lisa, Thrush, Steven, Barnes, Nicola, Holcombe, Chris and Potter, Shelley , iBRA Steering Group and the Breast Reconstruction Research Collaborative (2020) The impact of radiotherapy on patient-reported outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh. Annals of Surgery. (doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000004245).

Record type: Article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of PMRT on PROs of IBBR performed with and without mesh.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PMRT is increasingly given to improve breast cancer outcomes but can adversely impact complications after IBBR. Little; however, is known about the impact of PMRT on the PROs of IBBR, especially when mesh is used.

METHODS: The implant Breast Reconstruction evAluation prospective cohort study recruited consecutive women undergoing immediate IBBR from 81 UK breast and plastic surgical units. Demographic, operative, oncological, and 3-month complication data were collected, and patients consented to receive validated PRO questionnaires at 18-months. The association between IBBR, PMRT, and PROs were investigated using mixed-effects regression models adjusted for clinically-relevant confounders and including a random-effect to account for potential clustering by center RESULTS:: A total of 1163 women consented to receive 18-month questionnaires of whom 730 (63%) completed it. Patients undergoing PMRT (214 patients) reported worse PROs in 3 BREAST-Q domains: satisfaction with breasts [-6.27 points, P = 0.008, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-10.91, -1.63)], satisfaction with outcome [-7.53 points, P = 0.002, CI (-12.20, -2.85)] and physical well-being [-6.55 points, P < 0.001, CI (-9.43, -3.67)]. Overall satisfaction was worse in the PMRT group [OR 0.497, P = 0.002, CI (0.32, 0.77)]. These effects were not ameliorated by mesh use.

CONCLUSIONS: PMRT may adversely affect PROs after IBBR irrespective of whether mesh is used. These findings should be discussed with all patients considering IBBR and when indications for PMRT are borderline to enable informed decision-making regarding oncological and reconstructive treatment options.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN37664281.

Text
iBRA radiotherapy PROMs_R2_clean - Accepted Manuscript
Download (130kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 22 May 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 9 July 2020

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 441112
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/441112
ISSN: 0003-4932
PURE UUID: 20d383a6-096c-4d44-a25c-7b1fac13cd73

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Jun 2020 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 05:36

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Emma Stewart
Author: Nicholas Turner
Author: Elizabeth Conroy
Author: Ramsey Cutress
Author: Joanna Skillman
Author: Lisa Whisker
Author: Steven Thrush
Author: Nicola Barnes
Author: Chris Holcombe
Author: Shelley Potter
Corporate Author: iBRA Steering Group and the Breast Reconstruction Research Collaborative

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×