The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Why women are not small men: sex-related differences in perioperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing

Why women are not small men: sex-related differences in perioperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing
Why women are not small men: sex-related differences in perioperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing
Background: the use of preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to evaluate the risk of adverse perioperative outcomes is increasingly prevalent. CPET-derived information enables personalised perioperative care and enhances shared decision-making. Sex-related differences in physical fitness are reported in non-perioperative literature. However, little attention has been paid to sex-related differences in the context of perioperative CPET.

Aim: we explored differences in the physical fitness variables reported in a recently published multi-centre study investigating CPET before colorectal surgery. We also report the inclusion rate of females in published perioperative CPET cohorts that are shaping guidelines and clinical practice.

Methods: we performed a post hoc analysis of the trial data of 703 patients who underwent CPET prior to major elective colorectal surgery. We also summarised the female inclusion rate in peer-reviewed published reports of perioperative CPET.

Results: fitness assessed using commonly used perioperative CPET variables—oxygen consumption at anaerobic threshold (AT) and peak exercise—was significantly higher in males than in females both before and after correction for body weight. In studies contributing to the development of perioperative CPET, 68.5% of the participants were male.

Conclusion: to our knowledge, this is the first study to describe differences between males and females in CPET variables used in a perioperative setting. Furthermore, there is a substantial difference between the inclusion rates of males and females in this field. These findings require validation in larger cohorts and may have significant implications for both sexes in the application of CPET in the perioperative setting.
2047-0525
18
West, Malcolm
98b67e58-9875-4133-b236-8a10a0a12c04
Jack, Sandy
a175e649-83e1-4a76-8f11-ab37ffd954ea
Levett, Denny
1743763a-2853-4baf-affe-6152fde8d05f
Grocott, Michael
1e87b741-513e-4a22-be13-0f7bb344e8c2
West, Malcolm
98b67e58-9875-4133-b236-8a10a0a12c04
Jack, Sandy
a175e649-83e1-4a76-8f11-ab37ffd954ea
Levett, Denny
1743763a-2853-4baf-affe-6152fde8d05f
Grocott, Michael
1e87b741-513e-4a22-be13-0f7bb344e8c2

West, Malcolm, Jack, Sandy, Levett, Denny and Grocott, Michael (2020) Why women are not small men: sex-related differences in perioperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Perioperative Medicine, 9, 18. (doi:10.1186/s13741-020-00148-2).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: the use of preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to evaluate the risk of adverse perioperative outcomes is increasingly prevalent. CPET-derived information enables personalised perioperative care and enhances shared decision-making. Sex-related differences in physical fitness are reported in non-perioperative literature. However, little attention has been paid to sex-related differences in the context of perioperative CPET.

Aim: we explored differences in the physical fitness variables reported in a recently published multi-centre study investigating CPET before colorectal surgery. We also report the inclusion rate of females in published perioperative CPET cohorts that are shaping guidelines and clinical practice.

Methods: we performed a post hoc analysis of the trial data of 703 patients who underwent CPET prior to major elective colorectal surgery. We also summarised the female inclusion rate in peer-reviewed published reports of perioperative CPET.

Results: fitness assessed using commonly used perioperative CPET variables—oxygen consumption at anaerobic threshold (AT) and peak exercise—was significantly higher in males than in females both before and after correction for body weight. In studies contributing to the development of perioperative CPET, 68.5% of the participants were male.

Conclusion: to our knowledge, this is the first study to describe differences between males and females in CPET variables used in a perioperative setting. Furthermore, there is a substantial difference between the inclusion rates of males and females in this field. These findings require validation in larger cohorts and may have significant implications for both sexes in the application of CPET in the perioperative setting.

Text
Sex differences in preoperative physical fitness - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (84kB)
Text
Why women are not small men - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (645kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 20 May 2020
Published date: 4 June 2020

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 441385
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/441385
ISSN: 2047-0525
PURE UUID: 4cc7de2e-629c-44d1-9882-4abebdc52305
ORCID for Malcolm West: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0345-5356
ORCID for Michael Grocott: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9484-7581

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Jun 2020 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:46

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Malcolm West ORCID iD
Author: Sandy Jack
Author: Denny Levett
Author: Michael Grocott ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×